Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jonathan Binding vs Altug Celikbilek Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Binding vs Celikbilek analysis and find out who is favored!
Jonathan Binding vs Altug Celikbilek Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Binding has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Celikbilek has won 45.63%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Binding, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Celikbilek has won 51.68%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 32.34% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Binding has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Celikbilek has saved 62.15% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Binding has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Celikbilek winning 44.44% (W/L 24/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Binding has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 52/ 41), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 46% (W/L 19/ 22). Celikbilek has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 249/ 175), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 30/ 40).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Binding winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Binding winning 2 and Celikbilek winning 0. The last match between Binding and Celikbilek was at the Germany F15 (Bad Salzdetfurth), 11-10-2018, Second, Carpet with Jonathan Binding getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:53:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Binding and Celikbilek have played a deciding set 0 times, with Binding winning 0 times and Celikbilek 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Binding winning 1, and Celikbilek 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Binding has played against opponents with an average rank of while Celikbilek has played against players with an average rank of 308.3.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Binding has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Celikbilek has won 41% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Binding has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Celikbilek has converted 43.68% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Binding 1 - 0 Celikbilek
N/A
Rank
High
31
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
402
Rank
154
High
27
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
53% (85-75)
Career Total W/L
56% (346-272)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
55% (12-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$231,155
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Binding VS Celikbilek H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Jonathan Binding | Altug Celikbilek |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 10 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:0 | 1:53:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (62/94) | 54% (41/76) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (42/62) | 68% (28/41) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (16/32) | 51% (18/35) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 20% (2/10) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (30/76) | 38% (36/94) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Binding VS Celikbilek H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-6(7) |
Stats 
Jonathan Binding
Player
Altug Celikbilek
66%
(
62 of
94)
1st Serve %
54%
(
41 of
76)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
36 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
76)
88
Total Points Won
82
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jonathan Binding | Altug Celikbilek |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 55% (12/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 57% (31/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (277/230) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (6/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (6/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.47 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 116 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 56 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:36:19 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 299.82 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 61% (958/1577) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 71% (678/958) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 46% (287/619) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 45% (67/149) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (599/1502) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (9/9) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 55% (12/22) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 30% (3/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 71% (14/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 29% (14/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 25% (8/2) |
Jonathan Binding Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Finn Murgett
Player
Jonathan Binding
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jonathan Binding
Player
Nicholas Jovanovski
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
6
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Leonardo Catani
Player
Jonathan Binding
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
3
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
10
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marco Brugnerotto
Player
Jonathan Binding
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
40%
(
29 of
73)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
10
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jonathan Binding
Player
Suraj R Prabodh
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
85)
5
Aces
3
11
Double Faults
3
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jonathan Binding
Player
Anvit Bendre
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
3
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
0
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 4-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Dalwinder Singh
Player
Jonathan Binding
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
12
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
66
Total Points Won
62
|
2-6 6-4 10-7 | H2H | ||
view more
Altug Celikbilek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Fajing Sun
Player
Altug Celikbilek
65%
(
72 of
110)
1st Serve %
51%
(
47 of
92)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
40 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
92)
107
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Jie Cui
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
75
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Altug Celikbilek
62%
(
59 of
95)
1st Serve %
59%
(
66 of
112)
1
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
8
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
25%
(
5 of
20)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
50 of
112)
109
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Sanhui Shin
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Kenny de Schepper
Player
Altug Celikbilek
68%
(
73 of
107)
1st Serve %
69%
(
72 of
105)
8
Aces
13
4
Double Faults
2
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
52 of
72)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
40 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
36 of
105)
103
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(4) 2-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Max Wiskandt
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Altug Celikbilek
55%
(
49 of
89)
1st Serve %
53%
(
65 of
123)
3
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
8
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
36%
(
32 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
54 of
123)
111
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Jiri Vesely
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
16
Aces
20
3
Double Faults
3
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
17 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
79)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Altug Celikbilek
59%
(
62 of
105)
1st Serve %
63%
(
67 of
107)
4
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
3
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
47 of
67)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
38%
(
40 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
44 of
107)
109
Total Points Won
103
|
3-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Binding Vs Celikbilek Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
