John-Patrick Smith vs Maverick Banes Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L L L L L W L
Form
L W L L L W L L W WHead-2-Head: Smith 0 - 0 Banes
| Smith | Stats | Banes |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 864 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 108 | Highest Rank | 216 |
| 36 | Age | 33 |
| L | Plays | R |
| 5 | Titles | 8 |
| 54% (294-251) | Career Total W/L | 57% (295-220) |
| $377,555 | Career Prize Money | $720 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fritz VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
11 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Cobolli VS Djokovic PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
09 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
John-Patrick Smith Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Kyle Seelig
Player
John-Patrick Smith
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
John-Patrick Smith
Player
Kiranpal Pannu
66%
(
54 of
82)
1st Serve %
51%
(
52 of
102)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
98
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yosuke Watanuki
Player
John-Patrick Smith
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
12
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
17%
(
6 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Billy Harris
Player
John-Patrick Smith
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
9
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thomas Fabbiano
Player
John-Patrick Smith
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roberto Carballes Baena
Player
John-Patrick Smith
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Radu Albot
Player
John-Patrick Smith
66%
(
65 of
99)
1st Serve %
70%
(
68 of
97)
8
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
32 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
97)
103
Total Points Won
93
|
6-7(6) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
John-Patrick Smith
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
66%
(
53 of
80)
9
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Maverick Banes Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 4-6 6-4 10-7 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 5-7 10-9 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54% (294/251) | Win/Loss | 57% (295/220) |
| 53% (686/602) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (660/524) |
| 52% (6601/6073) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (5804/5198) |
| 55% (174/143) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (154/114) |
| 49% (18/19) | Clay Win/Loss | 58% (138/101) |
| 53% (57/51) | Indoor Hard W/L | 25% (1/3) |
| 54% (45/38) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) |
| 0.43 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 2666 | Aces Total | 823 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
| 878 | Total Double Faults | 614 |
| 1:20:33 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 628.17 | Average Opponent Rank | 561.68 |
| 66% (22580/34328) | 1st Serve % | 62% (12410/19863) |
| 71% (16047/22580) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (8464/12410) |
| 51% (5964/11748) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (3913/7453) |
| 39% (1203/3081) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (873/1875) |
| 37% (12847/34501) | Return Points Win % | 40% (7930/19787) |
| 48% (25/27) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/6) |
| 40% (4/6) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 46% (41/49) | Main Tour W/L | 17% (1/5) |
| 54% (179/154) | Challenger W/L | 48% (70/77) |
| 75% (45/15) | Futures W/L | 63% (224/132) |
| 54% (290/533) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (291/507) |
| 30% (3/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 44% (98/225) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (77/150) |
| 50% (93/186) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (86/160) |
| 82% (297/243) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (288/250) |
| 18% (297/54) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (288/37) |
| 20% (248/50) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (227/43) |
Smith vs. Banes Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
