John Sperle vs Osman Torski Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sperle vs Torski analysis and find out who is favored!
John Sperle vs Osman Torski Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sperle has won 49.56% of points on his second serve, while Torski has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sperle, in recent form, has won 54.05% of his opponent's second serve points, while Torski has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.69% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sperle has saved 55.41% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Torski has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sperle has won 60.87% of matches played (W/L 42/ 27), with Torski winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sperle has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 75/ 50), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3). Torski has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 19/ 16), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 3/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Sperle has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.08% of matches (W/L 41/ 24), where as Torski has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sperle winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Sperle winning 0 and Torski winning 2. The last match between Sperle and Torski was at the M25 Wetzlar, 03-08-2021, Q3, Clay with Osman Torski getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:18:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sperle and Torski have played a deciding set 0 times, with Sperle winning 0 times and Torski 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Sperle winning 0, and Torski 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sperle has played against opponents with an average rank of 134.39 while Torski has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sperle has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Torski has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sperle has converted 42.51% of breakpoint opportunities, and Torski has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Sperle 0 - 1 Torski
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
881
Rank
881
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
57% (97-72)
Career Total W/L
48% (23-25)
57% (8-6)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | John Sperle | Osman Torski |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
Games Won | 6 | 12 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 6 | 4 |
Avg Match Time | 1:18:0 | 1:18:0 |
1st Serve % | 63% (27/43) | 70% (38/54) |
1st Serve Win% | 48% (13/27) | 66% (25/38) |
2nd Serve Win% | 31% (5/16) | 38% (6/16) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 100% (6/6) |
Return Points W% | 43% (23/54) | 58% (25/43) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-3 |
Osman Torski
Player
John Sperle
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
27 of
43)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
6
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
41
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | John Sperle | Osman Torski |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 57% (8/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 57% (17/13) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 53% (152/133) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 56% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.25 | 0 |
Aces Total | 34 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.17 | 0 |
DFs Total | 23 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:28:17 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 40.5 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 60% (457/760) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 65% (299/457) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 47% (143/303) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 43% (39/90) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 44% (340/779) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 57% (8/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (8/14) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (8/8) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (8/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (6/0) | 0% (0/0) |
John Sperle Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Marcel Zielinski
Player
John Sperle
59%
(
52 of
88)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
36 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
John Sperle
Player
Manuel Mouilleron Salvo
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve %
74%
(
63 of
85)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
Q2 |
John Sperle
Player
Justin Engel
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
95)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
8
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
46%
(
31 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
49 of
95)
86
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Filip Cristian Jianu
Player
John Sperle
85%
(
55 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
John Sperle
Player
Lucio Carnevalle
50%
(
23 of
46)
1st Serve %
74%
(
28 of
38)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Lorenzo Carboni
Player
John Sperle
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
87%
(
13 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
John Sperle
Player
Marc Ros Mesas
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve %
49%
(
18 of
37)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
51
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Matej Dodig
Player
John Sperle
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
52 of
78)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
John Sperle
Player
Samuel Puskar
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ulises Blanch
Player
John Sperle
52%
(
59 of
113)
1st Serve %
56%
(
58 of
103)
7
Aces
10
8
Double Faults
4
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
48%
(
26 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
44 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
103)
108
Total Points Won
108
|
6-4 6-7(4) 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Osman Torski Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Alexander Weis
Player
Osman Torski
57%
(
51 of
89)
1st Serve %
50%
(
38 of
76)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
43%
(
38 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
89
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 5-7 11-9 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 7-5 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 3-1 ret. | H2H | |||
R1 |
Lenny Hampel
Player
Osman Torski
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Osman Torski
Player
John Sperle
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
27 of
43)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
6
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Osman Torski
Player
Kai Lemstra
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
46%
(
21 of
46)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
58%
(
35 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
55
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 0-6 10-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Miljan Zekic
Player
Osman Torski
56%
(
50 of
90)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
9
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
63%
(
25 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
39 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
86)
96
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H |
view more