Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Matchstat.com expert prediction for the Sperle Cizek H2H. Here is our in-depth stats analysis and accurate prediction of the Sperle Cizek head to head.
Full Stats Used To Calculate Our Sperle Vs Cizek Prediction Are Further Down This Page. Here Is A Brief Snapshot
The best career year for Sperle was 2023 when he won 62% of matches played on all surfaces (42/26). Cizek was in the best form in 2023 when he had victories of 46% of his matches (11/13). In their last event played, Cizek made the Q2 round at M15 Vigo, whereas Sperle played M15 Monastir and made the Second round.
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
2
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
18
Age
Plays
Form
57% (89-67)
Career Total W/L
45% (13-16)
62% (42-26)
YTD W/L
46% (11-13)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | John Sperle | Jiri Cizek |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 24 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Recent Form Is Very Important In Predicting An Upcoming H2H. Recent Matches With Stats…
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-0 | |||||
| 6-3 6-0 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | John Sperle | Jiri Cizek |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 62% (42/26) | 46% (11/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (92/61) | 44% (22/28) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (751/627) | 47% (244/275) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 59% (10/7) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 64% (32/18) | 48% (11/12) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.11 | 0.06 |
| Aces Total | 72 | 15 |
| DFs per game | 0.14 | 0.11 |
| DFs Total | 94 | 27 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:14:43 | N/A |
| Avg Opp Rank | 132.93 | 58.58 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (2075/3246) | 54% (229/423) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (1279/2075) | 63% (144/229) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (598/1171) | 43% (83/194) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (183/368) | 55% (16/29) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (1446/3362) | 39% (137/352) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 65% (41/22) | 46% (11/13) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 61% (41/67) | 45% (10/22) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (6/9) | 50% (2/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (9/18) | 75% (3/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (42/39) | 100% (8/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 7% (42/3) | 0% (8/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 12% (26/3) | 19% (16/3) |
John Sperle Matches Played
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Florian Broska
Player
John Sperle
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
57 of
85)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Kalman L. Boyd
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve %
71%
(
59 of
83)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alberto Barroso Campos
Player
John Sperle
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
77)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
86
Total Points Won
65
|
3-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Alexis Gautier
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Alberto Bronzetti
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Laelson Rodrigues
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oscar Weightman
Player
John Sperle
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Olaf Pieczkowski
Player
John Sperle
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
61
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Jan Kupcic
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
73)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Nicolas Tepmahc
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
75%
(
47 of
63)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jiri Cizek Matches Played
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 7-5 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Timo Stodder
Player
Jiri Cizek
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
68)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
4
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jiri Cizek
Player
Noel Larwig
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-4 10-6 | H2H | |||
view more
Sperle Vs Cizek Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
