Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
John Peers vs Marcus Daniell Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Peers vs Daniell analysis and find out who is favored!
John Peers vs Marcus Daniell Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Peers has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Daniell has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Peers, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Daniell has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Peers has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Daniell has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Peers has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Daniell winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Peers has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 45/ 25), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Daniell has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 58% (W/L 26/ 19), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 34% (W/L 12/ 23).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Peers winning 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Peers winning 4 and Daniell winning 1. The last match between Peers and Daniell was at the Australia F1, 13-02-2012, First, Hard with John Peers getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Peers and Daniell have played a deciding set 1 times, with Peers winning 1 times and Daniell 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Peers winning 0, and Daniell 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Peers has played against opponents with an average rank of while Daniell has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Peers has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Daniell has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Peers has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Daniell has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Peers 2 - 0 Daniell
Ret.
Rank
456
High
35
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
500
High
34
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
Form
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
58% (55-40)
Career Total W/L
48% (144-158)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,425
Career Prize Money
$4,155
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | John Peers | Marcus Daniell |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 28 | 20 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-3 6-4 | |||||
| 6-2 7-5 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | John Peers | Marcus Daniell |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
John Peers Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 4-6 7-6(4) 10-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats 
N. Vijay Sundar Prashanth
Player
John Peers
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
91)
4
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
26%
(
22 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(4) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Stephane Robert
Player
John Peers
51%
(
57 of
111)
1st Serve %
52%
(
46 of
89)
0
Aces
5
12
Double Faults
2
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
42%
(
47 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
89)
105
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
John Peers
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
5
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
6
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Robin Haase
Player
John Peers
69%
(
54 of
78)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
John Peers
Player
Artur Completo
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve %
72%
(
60 of
83)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Luka Gregorc
Player
John Peers
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
John Peers
Player
Michael Yani
52%
(
44 of
85)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
12
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
6
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
81
|
5-7 7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Florent Serra
Player
John Peers
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
1
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Marcus Daniell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Romain Jouan
Player
Marcus Daniell
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
2
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marcus Daniell
Player
Alexis Musialek
72%
(
77 of
107)
1st Serve %
57%
(
57 of
100)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
47%
(
50 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
105
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 |
Stats
Somdev Devvarman
Player
Marcus Daniell
59%
(
54 of
92)
1st Serve %
67%
(
66 of
98)
2
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
5
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
68%
(
26 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
30 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
101
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yannik Reuter
Player
Marcus Daniell
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
Player
Marcus Daniell
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
49%
(
30 of
61)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marcus Daniell
Player
Mikhail Ledovskikh
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
46%
(
32 of
69)
9
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
8
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Rogerio Dutra Da Silva
Player
Marcus Daniell
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
88)
9
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
5
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
48 of
61)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
0%
(
0 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
25%
(
17 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
88)
80
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 7-6(9) ret. | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Karen Khachanov
Player
Marcus Daniell
69%
(
54 of
78)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
7
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
24 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marcus Daniell
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Marcus Daniell
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
2
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
30 of
39)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Peers Vs Daniell Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
