John Hallquist Lithen vs Patrik Niklas-Salminen Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lithen vs Niklas-Salminen analysis and find out who is favored!
John Hallquist Lithen vs Patrik Niklas-Salminen Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lithen has won 52.94% of points on his second serve, while Niklas-Salminen has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lithen, in recent form, has won 54.35% of his opponent's second serve points, while Niklas-Salminen has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 21.28% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lithen has saved 63.64% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Niklas-Salminen has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lithen has won 64.29% of matches played (W/L 9/ 5), with Niklas-Salminen winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lithen has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2). Niklas-Salminen has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 48/ 38), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 52% (W/L 43/ 40).
- Player level: In the last year, Lithen has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 8/ 4), where as Niklas-Salminen has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lithen winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Lithen winning 0 and Niklas-Salminen winning 2. The last match between Lithen and Niklas-Salminen was at the M15 Karlskrona, 09-05-2019, Second, Clay with Patrik Niklas-Salminen getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:41:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lithen and Niklas-Salminen have played a deciding set 0 times, with Lithen winning 0 times and Niklas-Salminen 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Lithen winning 0, and Niklas-Salminen 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lithen has played against opponents with an average rank of 130.64 while Niklas-Salminen has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lithen has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Niklas-Salminen has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lithen has converted 42.86% of breakpoint opportunities, and Niklas-Salminen has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lithen 0 - 1 Niklas-Salminen
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
881
Rank
418
High
27
Age
L
Plays
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
Form
56% (14-11)
Career Total W/L
53% (164-147)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Lithen VS Niklas-Salminen H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | John Hallquist Lithen | Patrik Niklas-Salminen |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
Games Won | 0 | 12 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 6 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:41:0 | 0:41:0 |
1st Serve % | 63% (26/41) | 63% (20/32) |
1st Serve Win% | 31% (8/26) | 85% (17/20) |
2nd Serve Win% | 20% (3/15) | 58% (7/12) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 75% (6/8) |
Return Points W% | 25% (8/32) | 73% (30/41) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Lithen VS Niklas-Salminen H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-0 6-0 |
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
Player
John Hallquist Lithen
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
8 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
19
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | John Hallquist Lithen | Patrik Niklas-Salminen |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
John Hallquist Lithen Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Joshua Sheehy
Player
John Hallquist Lithen
51%
(
47 of
93)
1st Serve %
68%
(
71 of
105)
11
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
2
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
44 of
71)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
35 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
105)
101
Total Points Won
97
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
QF | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Eero Vasa
Player
John Hallquist Lithen
48%
(
26 of
54)
1st Serve %
79%
(
67 of
85)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
38 of
67)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
85)
80
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
John Hallquist Lithen
Player
Sebastian Gima
74%
(
64 of
87)
1st Serve %
50%
(
42 of
84)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
44%
(
38 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
42 of
84)
91
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Philip Florig
Player
John Hallquist Lithen
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve %
73%
(
35 of
48)
2
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Gilles Arnaud Bailly
Player
John Hallquist Lithen
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
10 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
John Hallquist Lithen
Player
Diego Dedura-Palomero
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
46%
(
34 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Patrik Niklas-Salminen Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Valentin Royer
Player
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
73%
(
69 of
95)
1st Serve %
75%
(
78 of
104)
10
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
55 of
69)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
65 of
78)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
22 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
29 of
104)
102
Total Points Won
97
|
5-7 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Karol Drzewiecki
Player
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
65%
(
26 of
40)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
21 of
26)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
52
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Lorenzo Giustino
Player
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
38%
(
19 of
50)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
10
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
15 of
19)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Paul Woerner
Player
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
60%
(
56 of
93)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
8
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
7
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
41%
(
38 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
83
Total Points Won
78
|
2-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Aleksi Lofman
Player
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
Player
Peetu Pohjola
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
Player
Oskari Eerola
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alastair Gray
Player
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Billy Blaydes
Player
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more