Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Matchstat.com expert prediction for the Haerteis Alimli H2H. Here is our in-depth stats analysis and accurate prediction of the Haerteis Alimli head to head.
Full Stats Used To Calculate Our Haerteis Vs Alimli Prediction Are Further Down This Page. Here Is A Brief Snapshot
The best career year for Haerteis was 2018 when he won 64% of matches played on all surfaces (49/27). Alimli was in the best form in 2022 when he had victories of 53% of his matches (18/16). In their last event played, Alimli made the Q3 round at M15 Monastir, whereas Haerteis played M15 Forbach and made the First round.
840
Rank
300
High
27
Age
L
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
Form
51% (226-218)
Career Total W/L
43% (46-61)
43% (16-21)
YTD W/L
50% (15-15)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Johannes Haerteis | Mikail Alimli |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 1 |
| Games Won | 1 | 2 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:13:0 | 0:13:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (7/12) | 63% (5/8) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (5/7) | 80% (4/5) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 20% (1/5) | 33% (1/3) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (3/8) | 50% (6/12) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Form Is Very Important In Predicting An Upcoming H2H. Recent Matches With Stats…
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-1 ret. |
Stats 
Mikail Alimli
Player
Johannes Haerteis
63%
(
5 of
8)
1st Serve %
58%
(
7 of
12)
1
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
80%
(
4 of
5)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
33%
(
1 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
11
Total Points Won
9
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Johannes Haerteis | Mikail Alimli |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 43% (16/21) | 50% (15/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 46% (39/45) | 52% (34/32) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (394/411) | 49% (314/322) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) | 50% (8/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (7/7) | 44% (4/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 27% (3/8) | 60% (3/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.27 | 0.15 |
| Aces Total | 105 | 47 |
| DFs per game | 0.25 | 0.18 |
| DFs Total | 97 | 57 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:56 | N/A |
| Avg Opp Rank | 354.24 | 148.67 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (1647/2545) | 55% (660/1200) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (1089/1647) | 64% (421/660) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (446/898) | 44% (237/539) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (98/217) | 47% (45/95) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (950/2507) | 37% (413/1103) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 44% (4/5) | 50% (1/1) |
| Futures W/L | 43% (12/16) | 50% (14/14) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 44% (16/36) | 48% (14/29) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 36% (4/11) | 57% (4/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 36% (4/11) | 29% (2/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 74% (19/14) | 81% (16/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 26% (19/5) | 19% (16/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 11% (18/2) | 14% (14/2) |
Johannes Haerteis Matches Played
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mikail Alimli
Player
Johannes Haerteis
63%
(
5 of
8)
1st Serve %
58%
(
7 of
12)
1
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
80%
(
4 of
5)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
33%
(
1 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
11
Total Points Won
9
|
2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Merida Aguilar
Player
Johannes Haerteis
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Johannes Haerteis
Player
Jody Maginley
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
48 of
71)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
21 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Johannes Haerteis
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
14
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicola Kuhn
Player
Johannes Haerteis
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
81)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Johannes Haerteis
Player
Luca Hesselmann
73%
(
56 of
77)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
2-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Johannes Haerteis
72%
(
78 of
108)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
95)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
43 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
95)
106
Total Points Won
97
|
6-2 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lucas Gerch
Player
Johannes Haerteis
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
49%
(
31 of
63)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Johannes Haerteis
Player
Kai Lemstra
68%
(
68 of
100)
1st Serve %
59%
(
56 of
95)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
44%
(
44 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
47 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
92
|
5-7 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Johannes Haerteis
Player
Mats Rosenkranz
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
75%
(
43 of
57)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
51
|
7-6(2) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Mikail Alimli Matches Played
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
Player
Mikail Alimli
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
43%
(
21 of
49)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Mikail Alimli
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
100%
(
23 of
23)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
47
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Antoine Vincent
Player
Mikail Alimli
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
43%
(
23 of
54)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Mikail Alimli
61%
(
60 of
99)
1st Serve %
58%
(
74 of
127)
9
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
8
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
48 of
74)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
33%
(
33 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
53 of
127)
119
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(3) 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mikail Alimli
Player
Johannes Haerteis
63%
(
5 of
8)
1st Serve %
58%
(
7 of
12)
1
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
80%
(
4 of
5)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
33%
(
1 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
11
Total Points Won
9
|
2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mikail Alimli
Player
Marc Antoine Gaillard
45%
(
36 of
80)
1st Serve %
67%
(
48 of
72)
2
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
35 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
80
|
2-6 7-5 15-13 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikail Alimli
Player
Alexis Berquier
47%
(
30 of
64)
1st Serve %
74%
(
39 of
53)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Haerteis Vs Alimli Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
