Prediction of Johan Nikles vs Matic Dimic Head-to-Head, Best Odds & Picks At Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
58% (286-205)
Career Total W/L
52% (86-79)
64% (44-25)
YTD W/L
61% (20-13)
$11,650
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Recent Form Stats
Johan Nikles vs Matic Dimic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nikles 1 - 0 Dimic
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nikles has won 49.77% of points on their second serve, while Dimic has won 46.89%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nikles, in recent form, has won 56.52% of their opponent's second serve points, while Dimic has won 48.76%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.68% and 35.48% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nikles has saved 57.87% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Dimic has saved 53.64% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nikles has won 63.77% of matches played (W/L 44/ 25), with Dimic winning 60.61% (W/L 20/ 13) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nikles has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 78/ 49), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 3/ 9). Dimic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 65/ 56), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Nikles has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.42% of matches (W/L 39/ 18), where as Dimic has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60.61% of matches (W/L 20/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nikles winning 1 times and Dimic being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nikles winning 2 and Dimic winning 0. The last match between Nikles and Dimic was at the M15 Heraklion, 16-10-2024, First, Hard with Johan Nikles getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:9:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nikles and Dimic have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nikles winning 0 times and Dimic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nikles winning 0, and Dimic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nikles has played against opponents with an average rank of 321.84 while Dimic has played against players with an average rank of 321.03.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nikles has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Dimic has won 86% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nikles has converted 46.49% of breakpoint opportunities, and Dimic has converted 35.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Johan Nikles vs Matic Dimic For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
stats | Johan Nikles | Matic Dimic |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 3 |
Aces (Total) | 1 | 3 |
DFs Total | 5 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:9:0 | 1:9:0 |
1st Serve % | 62% (32/52) | 67% (30/45) |
1st Serve Win% | 69% (22/32) | 50% (15/30) |
2nd Serve Win% | 60% (12/20) | 27% (4/15) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 83% (5/6) | 17% (1/6) |
Return Points W% | 58% (26/45) | 35% (18/52) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-1 |
Johan Nikles
Player
Matic Dimic
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
0
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Johan Nikles | Matic Dimic |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 64% (44/25) | 61% (20/13) |
Sets Win/Loss | 63% (95/57) | 56% (41/32) |
Games Win/Loss | 55% (771/627) | 52% (380/356) |
Hard Win/Loss | 69% (11/5) | 40% (2/3) |
Clay Win/Loss | 63% (33/19) | 64% (18/10) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.05 | 0.13 |
Aces Total | 31 | 47 |
DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.11 |
DFs Total | 145 | 40 |
Avg Match Time | 1:22:43 | 1:1:50 |
Avg Opp Rank | 321.84 | 321.03 |
1st Serve % | 66% (2481/3766) | 59% (747/1261) |
1st Serve W% | 61% (1517/2481) | 62% (461/747) |
2nd Serve W% | 48% (615/1285) | 47% (241/514) |
BPs Won% Total | 49% (205/422) | 35% (53/150) |
Return Pts W% | 45% (1665/3722) | 40% (538/1336) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 42% (5/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 68% (39/18) | 61% (20/13) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (43/68) | 61% (20/33) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 45% (5/11) | 40% (4/10) |
Deciding Set W% | 47% (7/15) | 86% (6/7) |
1st set W, W | 87% (46/40) | 100% (15/15) |
1st set W, L | 13% (46/6) | 0% (15/0) |
1st set L, W | 17% (23/4) | 28% (18/5) |
Johan Nikles Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Johan Nikles
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve %
64%
(
28 of
44)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Johan Nikles
Player
Deney Wassermann
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
69%
(
51 of
74)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Johan Nikles
Player
Markus Malaszszak
47%
(
26 of
55)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
5
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-1 2-1 ret. | H2H | |||
SF |
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Johan Nikles
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
8
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Johan Nikles
Player
Jack Loge
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Johan Nikles
Player
Pavlos Tsitsipas
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
87)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
87)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Johan Nikles
Player
Matic Dimic
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
0
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Hazem Naow
Player
Johan Nikles
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Johan Nikles
Player
Peetu Pohjola
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Matic Dimic Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Niels Visker
Player
Matic Dimic
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
50%
(
31 of
62)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Matic Dimic
Player
Petros Tsitsipas
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
35%
(
23 of
66)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
15
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Amit Vales
Player
Matic Dimic
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
57)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 2-6 7-6(4) 10-6 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Johan Nikles
Player
Matic Dimic
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
0
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Paty
Player
Matic Dimic
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
22 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF | 7-5 3-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Gabriele Piraino
Player
Matic Dimic
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Free Tennis Predictions For Today's Matches
A few tennis predictions for upcoming lower level events head to head tennis matches are below. If you want to get access to the best matches that will win you the most, subscribe to our tennis predictions plan for a low monthly fee and get full access to all our expert picks with full odds analysis and value bets.