Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Johan Nikles vs Fahad AL Janahi Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nikles vs Janahi analysis and find out who is favored!
Johan Nikles vs Fahad AL Janahi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nikles has won 44.11% of points on his second serve, while Janahi has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nikles, in recent form, has won 54.57% of his opponent's second serve points, while Janahi has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.49% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nikles has saved 56.57% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Janahi has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nikles has won 65.63% of matches played (W/L 21/ 11), with Janahi winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nikles has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 70/ 46), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 3/ 9). Janahi has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Nikles has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 71.43% of matches (W/L 20/ 8), where as Janahi has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nikles has played against opponents with an average rank of 81.03 while Janahi has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nikles has won 38% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Janahi has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nikles has converted 52.32% of breakpoint opportunities, and Janahi has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nikles 0 - 0 Janahi
N/A
Rank
High
27
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Johan Nikles | Fahad AL Janahi |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 66% (21/11) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 65% (46/25) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (357/268) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 69% (18/8) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0.02 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 5 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0.15 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 47 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1:5:22 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 81.03 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (959/1392) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 59% (569/959) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (191/433) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 52% (79/151) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (617/1349) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 25% (1/3) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 71% (20/8) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (20/31) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 38% (3/8) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 84% (25/21) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 16% (25/4) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (7/0) | 1st Match |
Johan Nikles Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Evan Furness
Player
Johan Nikles
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Johan Nikles
69%
(
72 of
104)
1st Serve %
73%
(
67 of
92)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
42%
(
44 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
92)
108
Total Points Won
88
|
6-7(6) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Seita Watanabe
86%
(
73 of
85)
1st Serve %
75%
(
71 of
95)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
38 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Matteo Fondriest
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matthew Dellavedova
Player
Johan Nikles
73%
(
55 of
75)
1st Serve %
73%
(
37 of
51)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Arthur Gea
Player
Johan Nikles
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
71%
(
47 of
66)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Matthew Dellavedova
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
18 of
28)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
79%
(
22 of
28)
52
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefan Popovic
Player
Johan Nikles
78%
(
62 of
80)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
95)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
95)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Johan Nikles
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Fahad AL Janahi Recent Matches Played
Before:
view more
Nikles Vs Janahi Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
