Joelle Steur vs Maria Garcia Cid Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 08 Nov at 11:21 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Steur vs M. Garcia Cid

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ESP
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Steur 1 - 0 Cid
They have played 2 sets in total, with Joelle Steur winning 2 and Maria Garcia Cid winning 0. The last match between Joelle Steur and Maria Garcia Cid was at the W15 Castellon, 09-11-2025, Round: F, Surface: Clay, with Joelle Steur getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Steur | 1 |
| Cid | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(F) W15 Castellon(11-09-25)
J. Steur vs M. G. Cid H2H Profile
J. Steur vs M. G. Cid Match Preview:
- Second serve success rates over the past six months show Joelle Steur at a slight advantage, winning 38.89% of points compared to Maria Garcia Cid's 37.11%. Could this small edge influence the outcome?
- Maria Garcia Cid excels in return games recently, capturing 50.66% of opponents' second serve points, marginally better than Joelle Steur's 50.11%. Is this a sign of stronger defensive play?
- Regarding first serve returns, both players are almost evenly matched, with Maria achieving 36.24% and Joelle 35.34%. Will this balance turn the tide in critical moments?
- Joelle Steur shows superior breakpoint resilience, saving 49.83% compared to Maria's 43.41%. Could this tenacity under pressure be pivotal?
- Examining win rates from the past year, Maria Garcia Cid boasts an 80.00% success rate, while Joelle Steur follows closely at 74.63%. Does this hint at Maria's current form being slightly stronger?
- Both players perform best on clay, with a 67% career win rate. Notably, Joelle has shown greater struggles on indoor hard courts, with a 0% win record. Could this surface preference play a key role?
- Both compete primarily in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, with Maria winning 83.33% compared to Joelle's 82.05%. Does this close statistic suggest comparable skill levels in similar competitive environments?
- Maria Garcia Cid has faced tougher opponents, with an average rank of 300.7 compared to Joelle Steur's 436.33. Could this experience give Maria the upper hand?
- In deciding sets, Maria demonstrates dominance, winning 80% in the past year versus Joelle's 63%. Might this suggest Maria's superior ability to handle high-pressure endings?
Editorial Prediction (November 8, 2025, UTC):
Maria Garcia Cid and Joelle Steur's upcoming match promises to be a closely fought contest, with both players showcasing strengths in different areas of their game.
While Joelle Steur holds a slight edge in second serve points, Maria Garcia Cid's stronger return game could neutralize this advantage. Maria's higher breakpoint saving rate might also prove crucial.
Given Maria's superior recent performance against higher-ranked opponents and her ability to thrive in deciding sets, she exhibits a potential edge under pressure.
Considering these factors, Maria Garcia Cid is slightly favored to come out ahead in this matchup on November 8, 2025.
Joelle Steur vs Maria Garcia Cid Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Steur vs M. G. Cid H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:38:41 | Average Match Time | 1:38:41 |
| 83% (43/52) | 1st Serve % | 71% (41/58) |
| 63% (27/43) | 1st Serve Win % | 44% (18/41) |
| 56% (5/9) | 2nd Serve Win % | 29% (5/17) |
| 55% (6/11) | Break Pts Won % | 60% (3/5) |
| 60% (35/58) | Return Points Win % | 38% (20/52) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Steur Recent Matches Played
M. G. Cid Recent Matches Played

J. Steur vs M. G. Cid Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.93% (131/84) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.07% (38/31) |
| 59.22% (289/199) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.64% (81/70) |
| 54.15% (2351/1991) | Games Win/Loss | 52.02% (709/654) |
| 54.55% (12/10) | Hard Win/Loss | 40.00% (10/15) |
| 62.63% (119/71) | Clay Win/Loss | 65.12% (28/15) |
| 0.00% (0/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 81 | Aces Total | 21 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 352 | Total Double Faults | 136 |
| 1:31:17 | Average Match Time | 1:10:3 |
| 465.73 | Average Opponent Rank | 407.19 |
| 73% (8510/11586) | 1st Serve % | 70% (2081/2993) |
| 57% (4835/8510) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (1142/2081) |
| 45% (1385/3076) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (393/912) |
| 51% (822/1619) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 52% (202/385) |
| 49% (5787/11887) | Return Points Win % | 47% (1410/2979) |
| 52.10% (62/57) | Challenger W/L | 47.22% (17/19) |
| 71.88% (69/27) | Futures W/L | 63.64% (21/12) |
| 62% (129/209) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (38/68) |
| 58% (19/33) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (5/9) |
| 55% (35/64) | Deciding Set Win % | 64% (9/14) |
| 86% (131/113) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 97% (33/32) |
| 13% (131/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 3% (33/1) |
| 21% (84/18) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (36/6) |