Joe Leather vs Benjamin Gusic Wan Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Leather vs Wan analysis and find out who is favored!
Joe Leather vs Benjamin Gusic Wan Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Leather 0 - 1 Wan
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Leather has won 38.46% of points on their second serve, while Wan has won 48.49%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Leather, in recent form, has won 46.15% of their opponent's second serve points, while Wan has won 46.41%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.76% and 30.55% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Leather has saved 51.61% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wan has saved 60.71% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Leather has won 61.9% of matches played (W/L 13/ 8), with Wan winning 38.46% (W/L 5/ 8) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Leather has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 14/ 8), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Wan has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Leather has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 61.9% of matches (W/L 13/ 8), where as Wan has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 41.67% of matches (W/L 5/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Leather winning 0 times and Wan being victorious 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Leather winning 0 and Wan winning 2. The last match between Leather and Wan was at the M25 Aldershot, 12-08-2024, Q3, Hard with Benjamin Gusic Wan getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:37:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Leather and Wan have played a deciding set 0 times, with Leather winning 0 times and Wan 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Leather winning 0, and Wan 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Leather has played against opponents with an average rank of 66.52 while Wan has played against players with an average rank of 269.46.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Leather has won 25% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wan has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Leather has converted 33.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wan has converted 44.64% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
16
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
60% (15-10)
Career Total W/L
38% (5-8)
58% (7-5)
YTD W/L
38% (5-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Joe Leather vs Benjamin Gusic Wan For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Leather VS Wan
stats | Joe Leather | Benjamin Gusic Wan |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
Games Won | 6 | 12 |
Aces (Total) | 5 | 2 |
DFs Total | 3 | 5 |
Avg Match Time | 1:37:0 | 1:37:0 |
1st Serve % | 62% (44/71) | 55% (34/62) |
1st Serve Win% | 70% (31/44) | 76% (26/34) |
2nd Serve Win% | 33% (9/27) | 57% (16/28) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 38% (3/8) |
Return Points W% | 32% (20/62) | 44% (31/71) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-4 |
Benjamin Gusic Wan
Player
Joe Leather
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
2
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Joe Leather | Benjamin Gusic Wan |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 58% (7/5) | 38% (5/8) |
Sets Win/Loss | 59% (16/11) | 39% (11/17) |
Games Win/Loss | 54% (140/118) | 46% (125/146) |
Hard Win/Loss | 58% (7/5) | 45% (5/6) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Aces Total | 13 | 13 |
DFs per game | 0.1 | 0.36 |
DFs Total | 13 | 48 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:29:54 |
Avg Opp Rank | 116.42 | 269.46 |
1st Serve % | 67% (186/277) | 55% (437/797) |
1st Serve W% | 63% (118/186) | 65% (284/437) |
2nd Serve W% | 38% (35/91) | 48% (173/360) |
BPs Won% Total | 33% (5/15) | 44% (26/59) |
Return Pts W% | 35% (86/244) | 36% (258/715) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Futures W/L | 58% (7/5) | 42% (5/7) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (7/12) | 38% (5/13) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 33% (1/3) | 50% (1/2) |
1st set W, W | 88% (8/7) | 80% (5/4) |
1st set W, L | 13% (8/1) | 20% (5/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (4/0) | 13% (8/1) |
Joe Leather Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Hamish Stewart
Player
Joe Leather
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-4 4-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF |
Benjamin Gusic Wan
Player
Joe Leather
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
2
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Joe Leather
Player
George Houghton
66%
(
54 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
39 of
67)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
38 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 4-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Elijah Strode
Player
Joe Leather
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve %
72%
(
53 of
74)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
24%
(
18 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
26 of
74)
82
Total Points Won
66
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Benjamin Gusic Wan Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Johannus Monday
Player
Benjamin Gusic Wan
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Benjamin Gusic Wan
Player
Joe Leather
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
2
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Benjamin Gusic Wan
Player
Luca Bluett
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
James McCabe
Player
Benjamin Gusic Wan
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
49%
(
25 of
51)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
15%
(
7 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
34
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Benjamin Gusic Wan
Player
Max Benaim
48%
(
32 of
67)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
2
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
0
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Alexander Maggs
Player
Benjamin Gusic Wan
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
22%
(
5 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
59%
(
34 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
60
Total Points Won
71
|
0-6 7-5 12-10 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Benjamin Gusic Wan
Player
Fabio Nestola
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
2
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
3
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
69
|
3-6 6-3 10-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Toby Martin
Player
Benjamin Gusic Wan
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
77)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Benjamin Gusic Wan
Player
Max Benaim
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
43%
(
22 of
51)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Free Tennis Predictions For Today's Matches
A few tennis predictions for upcoming lower level events head to head tennis matches are below. If you want to get access to the best matches that will win you the most, subscribe to our tennis predictions plan for a low monthly fee and get full access to all our expert picks with full odds analysis and value bets.
Leather Vs Wan Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Leather are available here and Wan photos here.