Jody Maginley vs Tyler Zink Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Maginley vs Zink analysis and find out who is favored!
Jody Maginley vs Tyler Zink Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Maginley has won 41.3% of points on his second serve, while Zink has won 44%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Maginley, in recent form, has won 43.75% of his opponent's second serve points, while Zink has won 50%. The same stats for first serve returns are 11.34% and 31.71% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Maginley has saved 60% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zink has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Maginley has won 40.63% of matches played (W/L 13/ 19), with Zink winning 28.57% (W/L 4/ 10) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Maginley has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 84/ 93), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 12/ 18). Zink has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 49% (W/L 24/ 25), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Maginley has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 41.94% of matches (W/L 13/ 18), where as Zink has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 25% of matches (W/L 3/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Maginley winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Maginley winning 0 and Zink winning 2. The last match between Maginley and Zink was at the M15 Naples, 21-02-2022, Q1 round, Clay with Tyler Zink getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Maginley and Zink have played a deciding set 0 times, with Maginley winning 0 times and Zink 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Maginley winning 0, and Zink 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Maginley has played against opponents with an average rank of 88.41 while Zink has played against players with an average rank of 269.57.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Maginley has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zink has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Maginley has converted 50% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zink has converted 16.67% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Maginley 0 - 1 Zink
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
28
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
874
Rank
781
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
46% (113-132)
Career Total W/L
44% (33-42)
60% (3-2)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Jody Maginley | Tyler Zink |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
Games Won | 8 | 13 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(4) 6-2 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Jody Maginley | Tyler Zink |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 60% (6/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 55% (46/37) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.17 | 0 |
Aces Total | 7 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.07 | 0 |
DFs Total | 3 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 56% (49/88) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 63% (31/49) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 41% (16/39) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 24% (12/50) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Jody Maginley Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF |
Andrew Fenty
Player
Jody Maginley
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
88)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
89%
(
31 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
79
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Keegan Smith
Player
Jody Maginley
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alexander Petrov
Player
Jody Maginley
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 7-6(5) 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF | 4-6 6-4 10-8 | H2H |
view more
Tyler Zink Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Learner Tien
Player
Tyler Zink
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
50%
(
25 of
50)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Keegan Smith
Player
Tyler Zink
66%
(
58 of
88)
1st Serve %
54%
(
57 of
106)
8
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
6
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
24%
(
21 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
106)
107
Total Points Won
87
|
6-7(2) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Tyler Zink
Player
Ramkumar Ramanathan
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
62%
(
55 of
89)
19
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
75
|
5-7 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
William Grant
Player
Tyler Zink
51%
(
39 of
77)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
3
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Tyler Zink
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
89)
10
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
6-0 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alfredo Perez
Player
Tyler Zink
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
47%
(
20 of
43)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Goncalo Oliveira
Player
Tyler Zink
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve %
46%
(
38 of
82)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tyler Zink
Player
Brandon Walkin
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve %
63%
(
25 of
40)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
9 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
38
Total Points Won
30
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tyler Zink
Player
Szymon Kielan
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H |
view more