Jody Maginley vs Ethan Schiffman Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Maginley vs Schiffman analysis and find out who is favored!
Jody Maginley vs Ethan Schiffman Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Maginley has won 41.3% of points on his second serve, while Schiffman has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Maginley, in recent form, has won 43.75% of his opponent's second serve points, while Schiffman has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 11.34% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Maginley has saved 60% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Schiffman has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Maginley has won 34.62% of matches played (W/L 9/ 17), with Schiffman winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Maginley has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 84/ 93), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 12/ 18). Schiffman has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 6), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Maginley has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 36% of matches (W/L 9/ 16), where as Schiffman has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Maginley winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Maginley winning 4 and Schiffman winning 0. The last match between Maginley and Schiffman was at the M15 San Diego, 12-06-2023, Q1 round, Hard with Jody Maginley getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Maginley and Schiffman have played a deciding set 0 times, with Maginley winning 0 times and Schiffman 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Maginley winning 0, and Schiffman 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Maginley has played against opponents with an average rank of 108.81 while Schiffman has played against players with an average rank of 301.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Maginley has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Schiffman has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Maginley has converted 50% of breakpoint opportunities, and Schiffman has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Maginley 2 - 0 Schiffman
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
28
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
46% (113-132)
Career Total W/L
0% (0-6)
60% (3-2)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Jody Maginley | Ethan Schiffman |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
Games Won | 25 | 13 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-3 | |||||
7-5 6-4 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Jody Maginley | Ethan Schiffman |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 60% (6/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 55% (46/37) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.17 | 0 |
Aces Total | 7 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.07 | 0 |
DFs Total | 3 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 56% (49/88) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 63% (31/49) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 41% (16/39) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 24% (12/50) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Jody Maginley Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF |
Andrew Fenty
Player
Jody Maginley
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
88)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
89%
(
31 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
79
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Keegan Smith
Player
Jody Maginley
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alexander Petrov
Player
Jody Maginley
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 7-6(5) 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF | 4-6 6-4 10-8 | H2H |
view more
Ethan Schiffman Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Gage Brymer
Player
Ethan Schiffman
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
49%
(
22 of
45)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Colin Sinclair
Player
Ethan Schiffman
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
24%
(
10 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
20 of
52)
51
Total Points Won
42
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H |
view more