Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jodie Anna Burrage vs Dejana Radanovic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Burrage vs Radanovic analysis and find out who is favored!
Jodie Anna Burrage vs Dejana Radanovic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Burrage has won 43.58% of points on his second serve, while Radanovic has won 43.63%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Burrage, in recent form, has won 58.33% of his opponent's second serve points, while Radanovic has won 58.43%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.24% and 40.48% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Burrage has saved 55.7% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Radanovic has saved 57.95% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Burrage has won 48.98% of matches played (W/L 24/ 25), with Radanovic winning 69.57% (W/L 48/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Burrage has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 54/ 33), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 35% (W/L 6/ 11). Radanovic has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 65% (W/L 34/ 18), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Burrage has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 56% of matches (W/L 14/ 11), where as Radanovic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 69.57% of matches (W/L 48/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Burrage has played against opponents with an average rank of 209.41 while Radanovic has played against players with an average rank of 303.65.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Burrage has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Radanovic has won 63% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Burrage has converted 45.45% of breakpoint opportunities, and Radanovic has converted 50.23% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Burrage 0 - 0 Radanovic
98
Rank
85
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
225
Rank
187
High
27
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
59% (231-162)
Career Total W/L
61% (330-209)
50% (5-5)
YTD W/L
53% (9-8)
$330,361
Career Prize Money
$12,023
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| w/o | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jodie Anna Burrage | Dejana Radanovic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (5/5) | 53% (9/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (12/11) | 54% (20/17) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (105/102) | 53% (184/163) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) | 33% (2/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 80% (4/1) | 80% (4/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.45 | 0.21 |
| Aces Total | 45 | 36 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 24 | 48 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:33:16 | 1:49:16 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 121.4 | 345.24 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (389/623) | 62% (738/1183) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (267/389) | 64% (470/738) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (101/234) | 42% (186/445) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (33/75) | 52% (74/143) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (288/684) | 46% (518/1120) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) | 53% (9/8) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (5/10) | 60% (9/15) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (2/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (1/3) | 60% (3/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (5/4) | 100% (8/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (5/1) | 0% (8/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (5/1) | 11% (9/1) |
Jodie Anna Burrage Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Marina Melnikova
Player
Jodie Anna Burrage
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
28%
(
7 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Jodie Anna Burrage
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
43%
(
20 of
46)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jodie Anna Burrage
Player
Jaqueline Cristian
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
33 of
43)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jodie Anna Burrage
Player
Varvara Gracheva
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jodie Anna Burrage
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
71%
(
66 of
93)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jodie Anna Burrage
Player
Emiliana Arango
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
78%
(
45 of
58)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamara Korpatsch
Player
Jodie Anna Burrage
59%
(
48 of
82)
1st Serve %
76%
(
51 of
67)
0
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
71
|
2-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
Player
Jodie Anna Burrage
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Jodie Anna Burrage
56%
(
61 of
109)
1st Serve %
70%
(
51 of
73)
9
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
38%
(
18 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
39%
(
43 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
25 of
73)
91
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jodie Anna Burrage
Player
Astra Sharma
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Dejana Radanovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Pia Lovric
Player
Dejana Radanovic
76%
(
53 of
70)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
93)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dejana Radanovic
Player
Tatiana Pieri
76%
(
61 of
80)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
44%
(
35 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lois Boisson
Player
Dejana Radanovic
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dejana Radanovic
Player
Dalila Jakupovic
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve %
74%
(
51 of
69)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
25 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
42 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
52
|
6-0 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dejana Radanovic
Player
Alina Granwehr
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ipek Oz
Player
Dejana Radanovic
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
80)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Malene Helgo
Player
Dejana Radanovic
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Dejana Radanovic
Player
Lea Boskovic
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dejana Radanovic
Player
Robin Anderson
61%
(
51 of
84)
1st Serve %
64%
(
62 of
97)
4
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
27%
(
9 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
46%
(
39 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
49 of
97)
94
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dejana Radanovic
Player
Julia Middendorf
70%
(
57 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
29 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
94
Total Points Won
76
|
6-2 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Burrage Vs Radanovic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
