Prediction of Jodie Anna Burrage vs Chloe Paquet Head-to-Head, Best Odds & Picks At Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
59% (254-174)
Career Total W/L
51% (410-390)
43% (3-4)
YTD W/L
0% (0-4)
$536,661
Career Prize Money
$442,085
0
YTD Titles
0
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jodie Anna Burrage vs Chloe Paquet Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Burrage 0 - 0 Paquet
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Burrage has won 49% of points on their second serve, while Paquet has won 41.69%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Burrage, in recent form, has won 57.16% of their opponent's second serve points, while Paquet has won 53.71%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.39% and 34.49% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Burrage has saved 62.98% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Paquet has saved 56.09% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Burrage has won 65.85% of matches played (W/L 27/ 14), with Paquet winning 46.27% (W/L 31/ 36) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Burrage has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 65/ 38), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 35% (W/L 6/ 11). Paquet has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 235/ 207), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 6/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Burrage has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 73.08% of matches (W/L 19/ 7), where as Paquet has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 47.5% of matches (W/L 19/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Burrage has played against opponents with an average rank of 272.73 while Paquet has played against players with an average rank of 217.81.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Burrage has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Paquet has won 48% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Burrage has converted 38.87% of breakpoint opportunities, and Paquet has converted 43.08% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Jodie Anna Burrage Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Cori Gauff
Player
Jodie Anna Burrage
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
3
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
6
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jodie Anna Burrage
Player
Leolia Jeanjean
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
58
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Leylah Annie Fernandez
Player
Jodie Anna Burrage
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
4
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
2
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
29%
(
22 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hailey Baptiste
Player
Jodie Anna Burrage
63%
(
87 of
138)
1st Serve %
60%
(
75 of
126)
10
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
6
69%
(
60 of
87)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
51 of
75)
45%
(
23 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
40%
(
55 of
138)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
50 of
126)
133
Total Points Won
131
|
5-7 7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jodie Anna Burrage
Player
Vivian Yang
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
7
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
Player
Jodie Anna Burrage
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve %
59%
(
23 of
39)
2
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
2
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jodie Anna Burrage
Player
Mariam Bolkvadze
57%
(
53 of
93)
1st Serve %
69%
(
75 of
108)
8
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
13
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
50 of
75)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
35 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
44 of
108)
102
Total Points Won
99
|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jodie Anna Burrage
Player
Polina Kudermetova
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jodie Anna Burrage
Player
Sofia Costoulas
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
11
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
5
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jodie Anna Burrage
Player
Amandine Hesse
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
8
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Chloe Paquet Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Cristina Bucsa
Player
Chloe Paquet
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Chloe Paquet
65%
(
60 of
93)
1st Serve %
63%
(
51 of
81)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
35 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
94
Total Points Won
80
|
2-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Robin |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Chloe Paquet
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Robin |
Stats
Belinda Bencic
Player
Chloe Paquet
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Chloe Paquet
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
10
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anca Alexia Todoni
Player
Chloe Paquet
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Valeriya Strakhova
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
76%
(
38 of
50)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Fernanda Labrana
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Heather Watson
Player
Chloe Paquet
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
74%
(
48 of
65)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
64%
(
62 of
97)
1st Serve %
65%
(
58 of
89)
6
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
39%
(
38 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
89)
100
Total Points Won
86
|
5-7 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Burrage vs Paquet?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Burrage Vs Paquet is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jodie Anna Burrage | Chloe Paquet |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 43% (3/4) | 0% (0/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 44% (7/9) | 11% (1/8) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (77/84) | 30% (21/50) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 43% (3/4) | 0% (0/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.47 | 0.49 |
| Aces Total | 37 | 17 |
| DFs per game | 0.42 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 33 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:51 | 1:28:13 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 211.43 | 123 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (290/503) | 60% (142/238) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (202/290) | 58% (83/142) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (103/213) | 33% (32/96) |
| BPs Won% Total | 28% (17/61) | 22% (4/18) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (222/569) | 36% (89/247) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (3/2) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (3/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (4/1) | 0% (3/0) |
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
