J. V. G. Ceolin
To Win
I. A. Valiente
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W W L L W L WForm
L W W W W W L W L LThey have played 2 sets in total, with Ceolin winning 2 and Pagani winning 0. The last match between Ceolin and Pagani was at the M15 Villa Maria, 20-03-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Clay, with Joao Vitor Goncalves Ceolin getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Joao Vitor Goncalves Ceolin | 1 |
Dante Pagani | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M15 Villa Maria(20-03-2025)
- / Second
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome wta
15 May 2025 / Semifinals
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome atp
14 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-2 |
![]() ![]()
Joao Vitor Goncalves Ceolin
Player
Dante Pagani
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 6 |
0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
1:45:26 | Average Match Time | 1:45:26 |
75% (40/53) | 1st Serve % | 70% (49/70) |
68% (27/40) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (26/49) |
62% (8/13) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (10/21) |
36% (4/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
49% (34/70) | Return Points Win % | 34% (18/53) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Analyzing the second serve performance over the past six months, Pagani and Ceolin exhibit closely matched abilities. Pagani has secured 38.67% of points on their second serve, whereas Ceolin slightly outperforms with 39.75%. Return game statistics further emphasize this close competition; Pagani has won 51.11% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ceolin has managed to win 50.65%. On the first serve return front, Pagani records a success rate of 31.82%, closely followed by Ceolin’s 31.38%.
In assessing their ability to handle pressure, Pagani has demonstrated greater resilience by saving 64.63% of breakpoints, whereas Ceolin's breakpoint saving rate stands at 51.61%. This particular metric is critical for in-game betting insights. Additionally, there’s a stark contrast in their yearly win performance: Pagani has a win rate of 85.71% from seven matches, compared to Ceolin’s 54.84% from 31 matches.
On clay surfaces, Pagani has a notable win rate of 75%, contrasting with Ceolin’s 52% on the same surface. Ceolin does better on hard courts, extracting 39% wins from past encounters. Both players, throughout the year, predominantly competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, with Pagani achieving a higher overall success rate of 85.71% over Ceolin's 56.67%.
It should be noted that opponent quality could affect outcomes, with Pagani's average opponent rank considerably lower than Ceolin's average rank of 372.94. In deciding set scenarios, the potential swings favor Pagani, holding a flawless 100% win rate, while Ceolin maintains a respectable 63%. A significant differential is observed in breakpoint conversion rates, with Pagani capitalizing on 35% of opportunities compared to Ceolin’s 28.26%.
In light of these comprehensive statistics, with particular emphasis on the consistent pattern of higher performance metrics in several key areas, Pagani appears to have the upper hand and is more likely to emerge victorious in the impending contest against Ceolin.
Ceolin vs Pagani Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Joao Vitor Goncalves Ceolin
Player
Drew Van Orderlain
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Juan Carlos Manuel Aguilar
Player
Joao Vitor Goncalves Ceolin
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(3) 3-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
Player
Joao Vitor Goncalves Ceolin
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | 4-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | |||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Joao Vitor Goncalves Ceolin
Player
Dante Pagani
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Dante Pagani
Player
Valentin Garay
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
20 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Gustavo Ribeiro De Almeida
Player
Dante Pagani
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
74%
(
35 of
47)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Dante Pagani
Player
Ignacio Novo
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
45 of
82)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Dante Pagani
Player
Leonardo Monferrer
66%
(
75 of
114)
1st Serve %
77%
(
106 of
137)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
58 of
106)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
27%
(
6 of
22)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
44%
(
50 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
65 of
137)
129
Total Points Won
122
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Dante Pagani
Player
Tadeo David Ramirez
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
52%
(
37 of
71)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
41 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
![]() ![]()
Dante Pagani
Player
Nahuel Fernandez
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
74%
(
46 of
62)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
50% (49/49) | Win/Loss | 60% (6/4) |
50% (110/110) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (14/9) |
50% (1008/1024) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (118/109) |
39% (7/11) | Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
53% (41/37) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (6/4) |
50% (1/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
90 | Aces Total | 4 |
0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
162 | Total Double Faults | 12 |
1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:27:25 |
226.11 | Average Opponent Rank | 0 |
64% (1795/2787) | 1st Serve % | 69% (320/467) |
62% (1119/1795) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (200/320) |
44% (434/992) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (68/147) |
38% (120/317) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 32% (26/82) |
40% (1129/2840) | Return Points Win % | 46% (245/529) |
0% (0/3) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
52% (49/46) | Futures W/L | 60% (6/4) |
49% (47/96) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (6/10) |
100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
50% (5/10) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 75% (3/4) |
45% (10/22) | Deciding Set Win % | 33% (1/3) |
88% (49/43) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (6/5) |
12% (49/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (6/1) |
12% (49/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (4/1) |