H. Hurkacz
To Win
J. Fonseca
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W L W L L LForm
W W W W W L L W W LThey have played 2 sets in total, with Fonseca winning 2 and Moller winning 0. The last match between Fonseca and Moller was at the Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid, 24-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Joao Fonseca getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Joao Fonseca | 1 |
Elmer Moller | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid(24-04-2025)
Fonseca | Stats | Moller |
---|---|---|
74% (23-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 58% (18-13) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
65 | Ranking | 108 |
59 | Highest Rank | 108 |
18 | Age | 21 |
- | Plays | - |
5 | Titles | 8 |
64% (76-42) | Career Total W/L | 67% (170-85) |
$428,435 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
3 | YTD Titles | 1 |
1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-3 |
![]() ![]()
Joao Fonseca
Player
Elmer Moller
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 5 |
5 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
1:13:14 | Average Match Time | 1:13:14 |
70% (37/53) | 1st Serve % | 65% (41/63) |
73% (27/37) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (23/41) |
50% (8/16) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (10/22) |
31% (4/13) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
48% (30/63) | Return Points Win % | 34% (18/53) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
In the sphere of second serve performance over the last six months, Moller has secured 42.76% of points, whereas Fonseca has a higher success rate at 48.09%. Interestingly, this particular statistic serves as a strong indicator for crafting accurate match predictions.
When assessing return game stats, Moller appears to have the edge, winning 49.73% of their opponent's second serve points, in contrast to Fonseca's 41.24%. Analyzing first serve returns, Moller again takes the lead with a 30.8% success rate compared to Fonseca's 25.89%. These figures are highly relevant when attempting to forecast the likely winner in this matchup.
Looking at how each player handles pressure, Fonseca demonstrates a stronger capability, having saved 58.79% of breakpoints against them versus Moller's 52.28%. Such stats can be instrumental in formulating in-game betting strategies.
Over the past year, Fonseca has shown a more impressive record, winning 71.88% of matches played (W/L 46/18), compared to Moller's win rate of 66.67% (W/L 60/30). This contributes to the overall head-to-head prediction in Fonseca's favor. However, the outcome could be swayed by surface preference; Moller excels on Clay with a winning percentage of 72%, while Fonseca achieves his best results on Hard courts with a win rate of 76%.
In terms of competition level, Moller has largely competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, securing a win rate of 64.79% (W/L 46/25). Fonseca, playing predominantly at the same tournament tier, boasts a superior win rate of 75% (W/L 24/8). Indeed, Fonseca has faced tougher opponents on average, with a mean rank of 114.3 compared to Moller's 255.4.
When it comes to deciding set performance, Fonseca leads by winning 57% of deciding sets in the past 12 months, whereas Moller stands at 40%. This is crucial for live predictions should the match reach a deciding set.
Both players demonstrate similar proficiency in break point conversion during recent matches. Moller has converted 34.72% of breakpoint opportunities, marginally bettering Fonseca, who converts at 32.72%. Such statistics can provide valuable insights during live matches when breakpoint opportunities arise.
In synthesizing these statistics, the prediction leans towards Fonseca as the likely victor, given their superior stats in match wins, pressure handling, opponent quality faced, and deciding set performance. This suggests Fonseca has the upper hand in the forthcoming match.
Fonseca vs Moller Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Joao Fonseca
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
18 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Jesper De Jong
Player
Joao Fonseca
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Tommy Paul
Player
Joao Fonseca
68%
(
69 of
102)
1st Serve %
72%
(
64 of
89)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
47 of
64)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
34%
(
35 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
89)
97
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(7) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Joao Fonseca
Player
Elmer Moller
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Alex De Minaur
Player
Joao Fonseca
55%
(
54 of
99)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
92)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
42 of
61)
62%
(
28 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
33%
(
33 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
92)
102
Total Points Won
89
|
5-7 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Joao Fonseca
Player
Ugo Humbert
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
96%
(
25 of
26)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
4 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Joao Fonseca
Player
Learner Tien
64%
(
63 of
99)
1st Serve %
62%
(
67 of
108)
10
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
47 of
67)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
31 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
39 of
108)
107
Total Points Won
100
|
6-7(1) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Joao Fonseca
Player
Alexander Bublik
66%
(
57 of
86)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
104)
8
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
10
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
39 of
60)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
104)
101
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(5) 7-6(0) | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Matteo Gigante
Player
Elmer Moller
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
Q2 |
![]() ![]()
Elmer Moller
Player
Kimmer Coppejans
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
84)
93
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Elmer Moller
Player
Facundo Bagnis
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Aslan Karatsev
Player
Elmer Moller
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Joao Fonseca
Player
Elmer Moller
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Elmer Moller
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
58%
(
57 of
99)
1st Serve %
60%
(
63 of
105)
5
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
0
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
49 of
63)
67%
(
28 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
30 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
36 of
105)
105
Total Points Won
99
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Elmer Moller
Player
Nishesh Basavareddy
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
48%
(
28 of
58)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
10
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Elmer Moller
Player
Francisco Comesana
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
64% (76/42) | Win/Loss | 67% (170/85) |
62% (178/111) | Sets Win/Loss | 65% (375/203) |
53% (1447/1271) | Games Win/Loss | 57% (3036/2336) |
76% (26/8) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (37/28) |
59% (35/24) | Clay Win/Loss | 71% (112/46) |
68% (13/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66% (21/11) |
33% (2/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
0.44 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
582 | Aces Total | 534 |
0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
252 | Total Double Faults | 875 |
1:42:7 | Average Match Time | 1:31:18 |
207.92 | Average Opponent Rank | 405.72 |
64% (5373/8432) | 1st Serve % | 63% (9859/15646) |
70% (3760/5373) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (6602/9859) |
53% (1632/3059) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (2743/5787) |
39% (354/897) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (963/2032) |
39% (3435/8772) | Return Points Win % | 46% (7392/16223) |
67% (6/3) | Slam W/L | 50% (2/2) |
50% (5/5) | Masters W/L | 67% (2/1) |
50% (2/2) | Cups W/L | 63% (5/3) |
67% (14/7) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
66% (38/20) | Challenger W/L | 64% (63/35) |
69% (11/5) | Futures W/L | 69% (98/44) |
63% (70/111) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (168/249) |
86% (6/7) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
60% (30/50) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (33/65) |
54% (22/41) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (37/74) |
89% (71/63) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (169/149) |
11% (71/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (169/19) |
28% (47/13) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (86/21) |