Joao Eduardo Schiessl vs Denis Petak Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 28 May at 10:12 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Eduardo Schiessl vs D. Petak

BRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CZE
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Schiessl 1 - 0 Petak
They have played 2 sets in total, with Joao Eduardo Schiessl winning 2 and Denis Petak winning 0. The last match between Joao Eduardo Schiessl and Denis Petak was at the M15 Warmbad Villach, 28-05-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Joao Eduardo Schiessl getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Schiessl | 1 |
| Petak | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M15 Warmbad Villach(05-28-25)
J. E. Schiessl vs D. Petak H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 58.59% (133-94) | Career Total W/L | 39.13% (18-28) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 3 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. E. Schiessl vs D. Petak Match Preview:
- Recent second serve performance shows Petak slightly ahead, winning 43.98% of points, compared to Schiessl's 43.36%.
- Petak leads in return game stats, securing 51.76% of opponent's second serve points versus Schiessl's 42.11%. Is this an edge for Petak? Yes, especially in return games.
- When analyzing first serve returns, Schiessl has a slight advantage at 29.43% over Petak's 28.09%.
- Schiessl saves more breakpoints under pressure at 54.11%, compared to Petak's 44.44%. Could this impact match outcomes under pressure? It's quite possible.
- Schiessl has a superior overall performance, winning 56.67% of matches in the last year compared to Petak's 45.45%.
- Both players excel on clay, with Schiessl holding a 57% win rate and Petak at 55%.
- Schiessl plays against slightly lower-ranked opponents, with an average opponent rank of 422.63 versus Petak's 345.
- In deciding sets, Schiessl edges out with a 38% success rate compared to Petak's 33%. Does this indicate mental toughness? Yes, possibly in closely contested matches.
- Petak has a marginal lead in breakpoint conversion at 34.55%, while Schiessl converts 31.65%.
Editorial Prediction (May 28, 2025, UTC):
In the upcoming match, both players demonstrate strengths in different areas of their game. Petak has shown a slight edge in second serve performance and return game stats, which could prove advantageous in winning crucial points and games.
Schiessl, however, displays a robust breakpoint saving capability and performs better under pressure, which can be pivotal during tight match scenarios. Additionally, Schiessl's overall performance across matches and success in deciding sets suggests a slight edge in resilience and consistency.
Considering all factors, including performance patterns and recent trends, Schiessl appears more likely to win, leveraging their mental toughness and overall match-winning abilities.
Joao Eduardo Schiessl vs Denis Petak Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. E. Schiessl vs D. Petak H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 8 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:22:36 | Average Match Time | 1:22:36 |
| 66% (37/56) | 1st Serve % | 62% (31/50) |
| 59% (22/37) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (20/31) |
| 63% (12/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (8/19) |
| 38% (3/8) | Break Pts Won % | 17% (1/6) |
| 44% (22/50) | Return Points Win % | 39% (22/56) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. E. Schiessl Recent Matches Played
D. Petak Recent Matches Played

J. E. Schiessl vs D. Petak Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.59% (133/94) | YTD Win/Loss | 39.13% (18/28) |
| 58.13% (304/219) | Sets Win/Loss | 42.72% (44/59) |
| 52.96% (2610/2318) | Games Win/Loss | 47.99% (477/517) |
| 55.26% (21/17) | Hard Win/Loss | 41.18% (7/10) |
| 59.26% (112/77) | Clay Win/Loss | 42.31% (11/15) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
| 348 | Aces Total | 127 |
| 0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.37 |
| 365 | Total Double Faults | 179 |
| 1:29:53 | Average Match Time | 1:28:18 |
| 384.05 | Average Opponent Rank | 413.87 |
| 66% (8448/12818) | 1st Serve % | 63% (1807/2861) |
| 65% (5517/8448) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (1173/1807) |
| 49% (2147/4370) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (457/1054) |
| 46% (608/1325) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (105/253) |
| 41% (5276/12722) | Return Points Win % | 39% (1099/2790) |
| 40.74% (11/16) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 61.00% (122/78) | Futures W/L | 40.91% (18/26) |
| 59% (133/226) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 40% (17/43) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 57% (29/51) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 62% (8/13) |
| 46% (32/70) | Deciding Set Win % | 33% (4/12) |
| 89% (127/113) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 73% (22/16) |
| 11% (127/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 27% (22/6) |
| 20% (100/20) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (24/2) |