J. Garland
To Win
A. Friedsam
To Win
Joanna Garland vs Camilla Zanolini Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W W W L W W
Form
L W L L W L W L W LHead To Head: Garland 2 - 0 Zanolini
They have played 4 sets in total, with Garland winning 4 and Zanolini winning 0. The last match between Garland and Zanolini was at the W35 Solarino, 12-03-2025, Round: First, Surface: Carpet, with Joanna Garland getting the victory 6-2 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Joanna Garland | 2 |
| Camilla Zanolini | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W35 Solarino(12-03-2025)
Joanna Garland
Camilla Zanolini
6
2
6
0
| Garland | Stats | Zanolini |
|---|---|---|
| 76% (29-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 62% (18-11) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 177 | Ranking | 494 |
| 177 | Highest Rank | 494 |
| 23 | Age | 22 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 16 | Titles | 3 |
| 69% (258-117) | Career Total W/L | 63% (114-66) |
| $2,400 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 3 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 2 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
23 May 2025 / Q3
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Zeppieri VS Gomez PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris atp
23 May 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Gadecki VS Gauff PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-0 |
Stats 
Joanna Garland
Player
Camilla Zanolini
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve %
67%
(
26 of
39)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
65%
(
15 of
23)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
16 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
28
|
||||
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats
Joanna Garland
Player
Camilla Zanolini
48%
(
13 of
27)
1st Serve %
50%
(
13 of
26)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
92%
(
12 of
13)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
6 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
36
Total Points Won
17
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 24 | Games Won | 4 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 0:53:4 | Average Match Time | 0:53:4 |
| 53% (36/68) | 1st Serve % | 60% (39/65) |
| 75% (27/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 41% (16/39) |
| 59% (19/32) | 2nd Serve Win % | 27% (7/26) |
| 60% (9/15) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (2/5) |
| 65% (42/65) | Return Points Win % | 32% (22/68) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Garland vs Zanolini Match Preview :
In the realm of second serve performance over the past six months, Zanolini outshines their rival, Garland, by winning 37.97% of the points, with Garland at 36.03%. This metric often aligns closely with the predicted match outcomes. Turning to return game statistics, both players demonstrate competitive capabilities. Zanolini has captured 46.29% of their opponent’s second serve points, whereas Garland has a slight edge with 47.42% in their favor. Considering first serve returns, Zanolini leads with 36.19% compared to Garland's 32.08%, indicators that further inform predictions in head-to-head matchups.
Looking at player performance under pressure, Zanolini has managed to save 48.34% of breakpoints in recent outings, while Garland shows a marginally superior figure of 48.39%. When evaluating overall performance during the past year, Garland emerges as the more successful player, achieving an 81.43% win rate (57 wins, 13 losses), compared to Zanolini's 70.83% (51 wins, 21 losses). Such figures offer a comprehensive head-to-head prediction overview.
Surface preferences could play a pivotal role in this match outcome. Both players excel on hard courts, with Garland boasting a 72% win rate and Zanolini close behind at 66%. Conversely, both players share a lower success rate on indoor hard courts, 47% for Garland and 50% for Zanolini. The hierarchy of competition levels further distinguishes them, with Zanolini competing primarily in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, winning 72.22% of those encounters, while Garland's matches mostly occur at the Challengers/ITF level, where they hold an 81.82% success rate.
Their head-to-head history favors Garland, who has secured victory in their sole previous encounter. In their matchup at the W 35 Solarino, Garland triumphed with a commanding 6-1 6-1 scoreline. The relatively brief match duration averaged at 0:41:49. Notably, the players have never faced each other in a deciding set or tied in a tiebreak, adding a layer of uncertainty if the match were to extend to those conditions.
Exploring opponent quality, Zanolini has squared off against individuals averaging a rank of 371.13 over the last 12 months, slightly superior to Garland's opposition average rank of 407.83. If today's match was to stretch into a deciding set, Garland would hold a significant advantage with an 81% winning record, compared to Zanolini's 52%. Moreover, Zanolini excels in breakpoint conversions with a 37.91% success rate, edging out Garland's 34.47%, indicating tactical awareness during critical game phases.
In conclusion, while both players bring formidable strengths to the court, Garland’s superior win record, head-to-head advantage, and higher success in deciding sets position them as the favorite to win this encounter based on the statistics.
Garland vs Zanolini Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Joanna Garland Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Joanna Garland
Player
Petra Marcinko
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
77)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
40 of
77)
87
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Joanna Garland
Player
Celine Naef
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Carol Young Suh Lee
Player
Joanna Garland
49%
(
38 of
77)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
67%
(
26 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
79)
81
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Joanna Garland
Player
Tiphanie Lemaitre
52%
(
34 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
69
|
0-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Joanna Garland
Player
Defne Cirpanli
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joanna Garland
Player
Kira Pavlova
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ekaterine Gorgodze
Player
Joanna Garland
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
44%
(
20 of
45)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Joanna Garland
Player
Evialina Laskevich
56%
(
44 of
78)
1st Serve %
80%
(
74 of
93)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
40 of
74)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
93)
92
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Camilla Zanolini Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Francesca Pace
Player
Camilla Zanolini
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
63%
(
56 of
89)
3
Aces
2
12
Double Faults
4
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
29%
(
10 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
45%
(
40 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
89)
90
Total Points Won
87
|
7-5 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilla Zanolini
Player
Mariana Soares
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
43%
(
20 of
46)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
13
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
12 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luca Udvardy
Player
Camilla Zanolini
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
71%
(
49 of
69)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
82
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Camilla Zanolini
Player
Lucie Pawlak
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lina Glushko
Player
Camilla Zanolini
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
0
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
93
Total Points Won
71
|
5-7 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilla Zanolini
Player
Lea Tholey
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
43 of
78)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
78)
74
Total Points Won
71
|
6-1 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hikaru Sato
Player
Camilla Zanolini
62%
(
67 of
108)
1st Serve %
79%
(
73 of
92)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
40 of
73)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
49 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
92)
106
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federica Di Sarra
Player
Camilla Zanolini
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve %
50%
(
8 of
16)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
50%
(
9 of
18)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
50%
(
13 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
21
Total Points Won
21
|
7-6(2) 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 69% (258/117) | Win/Loss | 63% (114/66) |
| 66% (551/279) | Sets Win/Loss | 62% (253/157) |
| 58% (4306/3117) | Games Win/Loss | 56% (2081/1648) |
| 71% (160/65) | Hard Win/Loss | 66% (58/30) |
| 66% (35/18) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (48/31) |
| 65% (53/29) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62% (8/5) |
| 67% (10/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 801 | Aces Total | 86 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 1064 | Total Double Faults | 411 |
| 1:36:33 | Average Match Time | 1:11:39 |
| 273.41 | Average Opponent Rank | 125.2 |
| 62% (13534/21955) | 1st Serve % | 70% (6085/8648) |
| 66% (8870/13534) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (3555/6085) |
| 49% (4115/8421) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (1123/2563) |
| 48% (1500/3126) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (656/1279) |
| 48% (10816/22516) | Return Points Win % | 50% (4499/8995) |
| 67% (2/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (4/4) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 25% (1/3) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 69% (173/79) | Challenger W/L | 55% (23/19) |
| 72% (78/30) | Futures W/L | 66% (91/47) |
| 69% (254/370) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (112/177) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (33/62) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (16/30) |
| 53% (44/83) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (26/53) |
| 93% (243/227) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (111/98) |
| 7% (243/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (111/13) |
| 23% (132/30) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (69/16) |
Garland vs. Zanolini Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
