Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Joanna Garland vs Caijsa Wilda Hennemann Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Garland vs Hennemann analysis and find out who is favored!
Joanna Garland vs Caijsa Wilda Hennemann Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Garland has won 52.87% of points on his second serve, while Hennemann has won 45.1%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Garland, in recent form, has won 55.02% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hennemann has won 55.78%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.35% and 45.52% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Garland has saved 56.25% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hennemann has saved 50.58% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Garland has won 61.54% of matches played (W/L 32/ 20), with Hennemann winning 63.49% (W/L 40/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Garland has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 70% (W/L 126/ 53), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 19/ 21). Hennemann has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 14/ 8), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 26/ 17).
- Player level: In the last year, Garland has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.44% of matches (W/L 29/ 16), where as Hennemann has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.29% of matches (W/L 19/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Garland winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Garland winning 2 and Hennemann winning 0. The last match between Garland and Hennemann was at the W25 Loughborough, 25-01-2022, First, I.hard with Joanna Garland getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:41:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Garland and Hennemann have played a deciding set 0 times, with Garland winning 0 times and Hennemann 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Garland winning 0, and Hennemann 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Garland has played against opponents with an average rank of 212.27 while Hennemann has played against players with an average rank of 270.32.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Garland has won 27% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hennemann has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Garland has converted 55.79% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hennemann has converted 48.52% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Garland 1 - 0 Hennemann
308
Rank
221
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
444
Rank
283
High
23
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
Form
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
65% (188-101)
Career Total W/L
62% (154-96)
50% (2-2)
YTD W/L
74% (20-7)
$2,400
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Joanna Garland | Caijsa Wilda Hennemann |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:0 | 1:41:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (45/65) | 63% (37/59) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 62% (28/45) | 57% (21/37) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (11/20) | 32% (7/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 40% (2/5) |
| Return Points W% | 53% (31/59) | 40% (26/65) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Joanna Garland
Player
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Joanna Garland | Caijsa Wilda Hennemann |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (2/2) | 74% (20/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 73% (43/16) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (45/34) | 57% (318/237) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) | 89% (8/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 73% (8/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 57% (4/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.1 | 0.12 |
| Aces Total | 4 | 31 |
| DFs per game | 0.13 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 5 | 50 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:41:31 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 25.5 | 282.48 |
| 1st Serve % | 51% (33/65) | 69% (1096/1588) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (24/33) | 62% (681/1096) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (15/32) | 45% (219/492) |
| BPs Won% Total | 100% (1/1) | 50% (124/250) |
| Return Pts W% | 24% (14/58) | 51% (786/1553) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 67% (2/1) | 67% (2/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 60% (6/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 86% (12/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (2/4) | 74% (20/27) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 75% (3/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 91% (22/20) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 9% (22/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (5/0) |
Joanna Garland Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 1 | 7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Joanna Garland
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
51%
(
33 of
65)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sayaka Ishii
Player
Joanna Garland
54%
(
50 of
93)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
94)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
36 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
94)
92
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 2-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Darya Astakhova
Player
Joanna Garland
67%
(
70 of
104)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
42 of
54)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
41%
(
43 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
98
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Joanna Garland
Player
Priscilla Hon
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Joanna Garland
Player
Mio Mushika
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joanna Garland
Player
Olivia Gadecki
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
32 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ena Koike
Player
Joanna Garland
68%
(
64 of
94)
1st Serve %
67%
(
59 of
88)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
34 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
88)
95
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(10) 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 2 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Despina Papamichail
Player
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
70%
(
67 of
96)
1st Serve %
70%
(
56 of
80)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
4
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
46%
(
44 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
91
Total Points Won
85
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Louisa Chirico
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
20%
(
4 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Mina Hodzic
76%
(
52 of
68)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Kaitlin Quevedo
Player
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Iva Primorac
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
10
50%
(
22 of
44)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
28 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
43 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Anastasia Iamachkine
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
87%
(
34 of
39)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Mina Hodzic
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
72%
(
42 of
58)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Garland Vs Hennemann Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
