Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jiri Vesely vs Thiemo De Bakker Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Vesely vs Bakker analysis and find out who is favored!
Jiri Vesely vs Thiemo De Bakker Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Vesely has won 48.41% of points on his second serve, while Bakker has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Vesely, in recent form, has won 41% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bakker has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.49% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Vesely has saved 57.69% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bakker has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Vesely has won 30.56% of matches played (W/L 11/ 25), with Bakker winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Vesely has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 206/ 135), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 40/ 44). Bakker has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Vesely has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 30.77% of matches (W/L 8/ 18), where as Bakker has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Vesely has played against opponents with an average rank of 188.83 while Bakker has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Vesely has won 38% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bakker has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Vesely has converted 31.43% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bakker has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Vesely 0 - 0 Bakker
N/A
Rank
High
30
Age
L
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
35
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jiri Vesely | Thiemo De Bakker |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 9% (1/10) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 25% (7/21) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 44% (124/160) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/4) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/3) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0.67 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 92 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 38 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1:54:10 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 154.55 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (551/850) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (385/551) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (146/299) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 33% (17/51) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 31% (266/863) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 11% (1/8) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 10% (1/10) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 20% (1/5) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/4) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 25% (4/1) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 75% (4/3) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (7/0) | 1st Match |
Jiri Vesely Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Jiri Vesely
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
74%
(
34 of
46)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
26 of
34)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
15 of
46)
63
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Bonzi
Player
Jiri Vesely
73%
(
78 of
107)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
101)
6
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
7
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
36%
(
38 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
101)
112
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mathias Bourgue
Player
Jiri Vesely
67%
(
69 of
103)
1st Serve %
60%
(
54 of
90)
6
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
38 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
101
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jiri Vesely
Player
Gianluca Cadenasso
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Jiri Vesely
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
16
Aces
20
3
Double Faults
3
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
17 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
79)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Jorda Sanchis
Player
Jiri Vesely
65%
(
61 of
94)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
99)
13
Aces
14
0
Double Faults
2
89%
(
54 of
61)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
49 of
64)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
20 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
31 of
99)
105
Total Points Won
88
|
6-7(4) 7-6(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henry Searle
Player
Jiri Vesely
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
32 of
38)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
18 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
24%
(
14 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hamish Stewart
Player
Jiri Vesely
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
70%
(
50 of
71)
19
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Fils
Player
Jiri Vesely
66%
(
65 of
99)
1st Serve %
68%
(
88 of
129)
18
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
8
85%
(
55 of
65)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
59 of
88)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
21%
(
21 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
51 of
129)
129
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jaume Antoni Munar Clar
Player
Jiri Vesely
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
11
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
16 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Thiemo De Bakker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Etienne Donnet
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
50%
(
44 of
88)
8
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(7) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Florian Broska
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve %
47%
(
40 of
86)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
29 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
22 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Niklas Waldner
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
32 of
38)
87%
(
20 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
9 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Gea
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
4
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oleg Prihodko
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
8
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
43 of
58)
63%
(
24 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
29 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
32 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
51%
(
32 of
63)
1st Serve %
39%
(
23 of
59)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Toby Martin
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
49%
(
19 of
39)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
5%
(
1 of
20)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
15 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve %
56%
(
61 of
108)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
82%
(
45 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
21%
(
16 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
108)
103
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Vesely Vs Bakker Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
