Jing-Jing Lu vs Angela Haynes Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L L L W L W L
Form
L L W W L L L L L LHead To Head: Lu 1 - 0 Haynes
They have played 2 sets in total, with Lu winning 2 and Haynes winning 0. The last match between Lu and Haynes was at the Clearwater, 08-03-2010, First, Hard with Jing-Jing Lu getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jing-Jing Lu | 1 |
| Angela Haynes | 0 |
Clearwater(08-03-2010)
6
4
6
2
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Eala VS Gibert PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
25 Mar 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Svitolina VS Swiatek PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
24 Mar 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 | |||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
12
Games Won
6
0
Aces (Total)
0
0
Total Double Faults
0
0:0:0
Average Match Time
0:0:0
0% (0/0)
1st Serve %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Serve Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
2nd Serve Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Break Points Won % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Return Points Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jing-Jing Lu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Fang Ying Xun
Player
Jing-Jing Lu
62%
(
64 of
104)
1st Serve %
79%
(
66 of
84)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
43 of
66)
38%
(
15 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
47%
(
49 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
92
Total Points Won
96
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jing-Jing Lu
Player
Tiphanie Lemaitre
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Erika Sema
Player
Jing-Jing Lu
69%
(
72 of
105)
1st Serve %
78%
(
69 of
88)
1
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
2
53%
(
38 of
72)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
51%
(
54 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
44 of
88)
95
Total Points Won
98
|
2-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jing-Jing Lu
Player
Zixuan Zeng
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yidi Yang
Player
Jing-Jing Lu
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
78%
(
63 of
81)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
43 of
81)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ho Ching Wu
Player
Jing-Jing Lu
64%
(
66 of
103)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
5
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
35%
(
13 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
46%
(
47 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
96
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marie Mettraux
Player
Jing-Jing Lu
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
8
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
49%
(
33 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jing-Jing Lu
Player
Gaia Maduzzi
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
49%
(
30 of
61)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
74
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elina Nepliy
Player
Jing-Jing Lu
70%
(
55 of
79)
1st Serve %
71%
(
64 of
90)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
8
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
49%
(
39 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
45 of
90)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jing-Jing Lu
Player
Joelle Steur
84%
(
52 of
62)
1st Serve %
78%
(
49 of
63)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
18 of
49)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
48%
(
30 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Angela Haynes Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Catalina Castano
Player
Angela Haynes
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sophie Ferguson
Player
Angela Haynes
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Angela Haynes
Player
Lilia Osterloh
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
72%
(
44 of
61)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
55% (297/246)
Win/Loss
50% (180/181)
53% (664/578)
Sets Win/Loss
50% (412/413)
52% (5897/5527)
Games Win/Loss
50% (3859/3793)
56% (236/187)
Hard Win/Loss
53% (119/107)
51% (39/38)
Clay Win/Loss
44% (35/44)
48% (14/15)
Indoor Hard W/L
51% (25/24)
57% (8/6)
Grass Win/Loss
14% (1/6)
0.06
Aces Per Game
0.04
347
Aces Total
141
0.22
Double Faults Per Game
0.05
1221
Total Double Faults
169
1st Match
Average Match Time
1st Match
570.96
Average Opponent Rank
508.91
64% (12308/19248)
1st Serve %
67% (3087/4590)
59% (7312/12308)
1st Serve Win %
62% (1902/3087)
42% (2898/6940)
2nd Serve Win %
46% (697/1502)
49% (1279/2587)
Break Points Won % (Total)
44% (227/511)
48% (9181/19182)
Return Points Win %
43% (1928/4526)
20% (3/12)
Slam W/L
41% (11/16)
38% (3/5)
Masters W/L
43% (12/16)
33% (1/2)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
45% (24/29)
Main Tour W/L
51% (54/51)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
58% (247/182)
Challenger W/L
50% (98/98)
54% (19/16)
Futures W/L
100% (5/0)
55% (289/528)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
49% (177/358)
100% (1/1)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
44% (47/107)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
48% (44/91)
55% (93/170)
Deciding Set Win %
48% (51/107)
88% (279/246)
1st Set Won, Won Match
83% (175/146)
12% (279/33)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
17% (175/29)
19% (263/51)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
18% (185/33)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
