Jimmy Yang vs Lambert Ruland Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Yang vs Ruland analysis and find out who is favored!
Jimmy Yang vs Lambert Ruland Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Yang has won 45.68% of points on his second serve, while Ruland has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Yang, in recent form, has won 43.24% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ruland has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.79% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Yang has saved 51.39% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ruland has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Yang has won 45.1% of matches played (W/L 23/ 28), with Ruland winning 75% (W/L 9/ 3) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Yang has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 10/ 10), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 42% (W/L 10/ 14). Ruland has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 17/ 12), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Yang has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 46.81% of matches (W/L 22/ 25), where as Ruland has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 9/ 3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Yang winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Yang winning 2 and Ruland winning 1. The last match between Yang and Ruland was at the M25 Ricany, 30-08-2021, Q2 round, Clay with Jimmy Yang getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Yang and Ruland have played a deciding set 1 times, with Yang winning 1 times and Ruland 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Yang winning 1, and Ruland 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Yang has played against opponents with an average rank of 115.04 while Ruland has played against players with an average rank of 161.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Yang has won 36% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ruland has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Yang has converted 42% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ruland has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Yang 1 - 0 Ruland
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
724
Rank
709
High
26
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
48% (73-80)
Career Total W/L
57% (17-13)
33% (4-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Jimmy Yang | Lambert Ruland |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 24 | 22 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-7(4) 7-6(5) 11-9 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Jimmy Yang | Lambert Ruland |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 33% (4/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 35% (9/17) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 46% (119/138) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 29% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.38 | 0 |
Aces Total | 48 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.3 | 0 |
DFs Total | 38 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:18:55 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 51.08 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 56% (311/558) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 70% (219/311) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 45% (112/247) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 46% (18/39) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 35% (201/572) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 33% (4/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (4/12) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 80% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 20% (5/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (7/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Jimmy Yang Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Keisuke Saitoh
Player
Jimmy Yang
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
51
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Takuya Kumasaka
Player
Jimmy Yang
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
20 of
26)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Yan Bai
Player
Jimmy Yang
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Jimmy Yang
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Alexandre Aubriot
Player
Jimmy Yang
54%
(
37 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
6
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
17 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
23 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jimmy Yang
Player
Charlie Camus
54%
(
55 of
102)
1st Serve %
61%
(
67 of
109)
17
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
6
82%
(
45 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
46 of
67)
55%
(
26 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
31 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
109)
113
Total Points Won
98
|
6-2 6-7(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jimmy Yang
Player
Leo Raquillet
50%
(
27 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
1
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
3
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H |
view more
Lambert Ruland Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Damien Wenger
Player
Lambert Ruland
55%
(
54 of
99)
1st Serve %
65%
(
58 of
89)
5
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
3
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
58%
(
26 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
37 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
89)
104
Total Points Won
84
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Lambert Ruland
Player
Peter Buldorini
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Lambert Ruland
Player
Nico Jaeger
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Mathys Erhard
Player
Lambert Ruland
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Lambert Ruland
Player
Toby Alex Kodat
82%
(
50 of
61)
1st Serve %
76%
(
62 of
82)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Lambert Ruland
Player
Francesco Ferrari
56%
(
64 of
114)
1st Serve %
78%
(
66 of
85)
8
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
40 of
66)
46%
(
23 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
39%
(
45 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
85)
105
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Lambert Ruland
Player
Siim Troost
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
2
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Hynek Barton
Player
Lambert Ruland
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H |
view more