Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jill Craybas vs Ryoko Fuda Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Craybas vs Fuda analysis and find out who is favored!
Jill Craybas vs Ryoko Fuda Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Craybas has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Fuda has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Craybas, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Fuda has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Craybas has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fuda has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Craybas has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Fuda winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Craybas has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 51/ 44), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 37% (W/L 22/ 37). Fuda has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 147/ 108), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Craybas winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Craybas winning 2 and Fuda winning 0. The last match between Craybas and Fuda was at the Toray Pan Pacific Open - Tokyo, 24-09-2011, Q3, Hard with Jill Craybas getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Craybas and Fuda have played a deciding set 0 times, with Craybas winning 0 times and Fuda 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Craybas winning 0, and Fuda 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Craybas has played against opponents with an average rank of while Fuda has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Craybas has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fuda has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Craybas has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fuda has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Craybas 1 - 0 Fuda
Ret.
Rank
39
High
49
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
143
High
37
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
46% (341-403)
Career Total W/L
56% (178-138)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$665,086
Career Prize Money
$43,640
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jill Craybas | Ryoko Fuda |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 7-5 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jill Craybas | Ryoko Fuda |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Jill Craybas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Julia Boserup
Player
Jill Craybas
61%
(
58 of
95)
1st Serve %
59%
(
61 of
104)
3
Aces
0
11
Double Faults
7
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
43%
(
9 of
21)
Break Points Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
55%
(
52 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
56 of
104)
99
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kristyna Pliskova
Player
Jill Craybas
80%
(
75 of
94)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
6-7(3) 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Marina Melnikova
Player
Jill Craybas
73%
(
82 of
113)
1st Serve %
74%
(
80 of
108)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
45 of
80)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
43%
(
49 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
52 of
108)
116
Total Points Won
105
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jill Craybas
Player
Magda Linette
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
50%
(
36 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
43 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Oksana Kalashnikova
Player
Jill Craybas
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 2-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Ryoko Fuda Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Rika Fujiwara
Player
Ryoko Fuda
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
71%
(
53 of
75)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
29%
(
7 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
2-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Nicole Rottmann
Player
Ryoko Fuda
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Ryoko Fuda
Player
Natalie Grandin
62%
(
59 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
93)
1
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
3
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
36%
(
13 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
95
Total Points Won
93
|
0-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryoko Fuda
Player
Shuko Aoyama
67%
(
55 of
82)
1st Serve %
54%
(
53 of
98)
0
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
10
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
98)
89
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jana Cepelova
Player
Ryoko Fuda
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryoko Fuda
Player
Alisa Ogorodova
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
49%
(
18 of
37)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
54
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Craybas Vs Fuda Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
