Jil Teichmann vs Maryna Zanevska Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W W W L W L L
Form
W L L L L W L L L LHead-To-Head: Teichmann 1 - 1 Zanevska
They have played 6 sets in total, with Teichmann winning 3 and Zanevska winning 3. The last match between Teichmann and Zanevska was at the Internationaux de Strasbourg - Strasbourg, 21-05-2023, First, Clay with Jil Teichmann getting the victory 4-6 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jil Teichmann | 1 |
| Maryna Zanevska | 1 |
Internationaux de Strasbourg - Strasbourg(21-05-2023)
4
6
6
3
6
4
| Teichmann | Stats | Zanevska |
|---|---|---|
| 67% (12-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 96 | Ranking | 769 |
| 21 | Highest Rank | 62 |
| 27 | Age | 31 |
| L | Plays | R |
| 11 | Titles | 21 |
| 58% (336-244) | Career Total W/L | 61% (436-273) |
| $1,860,063 | Career Prize Money | $707,986 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Djokovic VS Dimitrov PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
28 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Mensik VS Fritz PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
29 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Jil Teichmann
Player
Maryna Zanevska
60%
(
61 of
102)
1st Serve %
59%
(
58 of
98)
2
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
8
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
101
Total Points Won
99
|
||||
| 6-3 2-6 6-2 |
Stats
Maryna Zanevska
Player
Jil Teichmann
54%
(
49 of
90)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
99)
4
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
7
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
41 of
67)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
99)
100
Total Points Won
89
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 27 | Games Won | 27 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 12 |
| 10 | Total Double Faults | 15 |
| 2:21:50 | Average Match Time | 2:21:50 |
| 64% (128/201) | 1st Serve % | 57% (107/188) |
| 66% (85/128) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (75/107) |
| 38% (28/73) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (36/81) |
| 31% (8/26) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (9/24) |
| 41% (77/188) | Return Points Win % | 44% (88/201) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jil Teichmann Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Jil Teichmann
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
Player
Jil Teichmann
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Julia Riera
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
61%
(
52 of
85)
1
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
85
Total Points Won
78
|
6-2 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daria Saville
Player
Jil Teichmann
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
48%
(
38 of
79)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
42 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
79)
92
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Mananchaya Sawangkaew
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Maaya Rajeshwaran Revathi
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
38%
(
20 of
52)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Shrivalli Rashmikaa Bhamidipaty
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
44%
(
28 of
63)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Arianne Hartono
60%
(
64 of
106)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
96)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
62%
(
26 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
37%
(
39 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
96)
107
Total Points Won
95
|
6-7(4) 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Emina Bektas
73%
(
11 of
15)
1st Serve %
68%
(
21 of
31)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
82%
(
9 of
11)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
30
Total Points Won
16
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Xinyu Wang
Player
Jil Teichmann
68%
(
94 of
138)
1st Serve %
69%
(
87 of
126)
8
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
69 of
94)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
61 of
87)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
34%
(
47 of
138)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
45 of
126)
136
Total Points Won
128
|
6-7(5) 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Maryna Zanevska Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Maryna Zanevska
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
9
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
6
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
13%
(
2 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamara Korpatsch
Player
Maryna Zanevska
51%
(
22 of
43)
1st Serve %
43%
(
22 of
51)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Barbora Strycova
Player
Maryna Zanevska
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
70
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Errani
Player
Maryna Zanevska
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maryna Zanevska
Player
Lena Papadakis
55%
(
49 of
89)
1st Serve %
65%
(
65 of
100)
8
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
5
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
43 of
65)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
35%
(
31 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
100)
97
Total Points Won
92
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yulia Putintseva
Player
Maryna Zanevska
73%
(
63 of
86)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
97)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
38 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
97)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Maryna Zanevska
60%
(
61 of
102)
1st Serve %
59%
(
58 of
98)
2
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
8
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
101
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Barbora Strycova
Player
Maryna Zanevska
74%
(
60 of
81)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
64)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
89%
(
8 of
9)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
49%
(
40 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Katie Volynets
Player
Maryna Zanevska
73%
(
63 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
60 of
94)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
45%
(
39 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
90
Total Points Won
90
|
2-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maryna Zanevska
Player
Laura Pigossi
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (336/244) | Win/Loss | 61% (436/273) |
| 57% (750/573) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (980/662) |
| 53% (6392/5668) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (8214/7007) |
| 52% (102/96) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (80/69) |
| 66% (199/101) | Clay Win/Loss | 63% (211/124) |
| 47% (31/35) | Indoor Hard W/L | 69% (135/61) |
| 25% (4/12) | Grass Win/Loss | 34% (10/19) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 977 | Aces Total | 842 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 1527 | Total Double Faults | 2470 |
| 1:24:22 | Average Match Time | 1:6:35 |
| 401.51 | Average Opponent Rank | 527.2 |
| 61% (20412/33358) | 1st Serve % | 61% (19982/32950) |
| 63% (12852/20412) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (12716/19982) |
| 47% (6121/12946) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (5524/12967) |
| 48% (1962/4101) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (2161/4298) |
| 45% (15315/33805) | Return Points Win % | 47% (15420/32605) |
| 38% (18/30) | Slam W/L | 47% (33/37) |
| 49% (30/31) | Masters W/L | 31% (5/11) |
| 83% (5/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 54% (87/75) | Main Tour W/L | 52% (70/65) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 63% (160/95) | Challenger W/L | 65% (273/147) |
| 75% (36/12) | Futures W/L | 83% (55/11) |
| 58% (331/570) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (428/681) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 52% (67/129) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (97/175) |
| 53% (89/169) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (134/246) |
| 86% (336/290) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (411/355) |
| 13% (336/45) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (411/55) |
| 19% (244/46) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 28% (298/82) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
