Jiaqi Wang vs Ikumi Yamazaki Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W L W W W L
Form
W L L L L W W W W WHead-To-Head: Wang 1 - 0 Yamazaki
They have played 3 sets in total, with Wang winning 2 and Yamazaki winning 1. The last match between Wang and Yamazaki was at the W50 Taizhou, 17-06-2025, Round: First, Surface: Hard, with Jiaqi Wang getting the victory 6-2 1-6 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jiaqi Wang | 1 |
| Ikumi Yamazaki | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W50 Taizhou(17-06-2025)
Jiaqi Wang
Ikumi Yamazaki
6
2
1
6
6
0
| Wang | Stats | Yamazaki |
|---|---|---|
| 54% (19-16) | YTD Win/Loss | 58% (21-15) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 596 | Ranking | 402 |
| 490 | Highest Rank | 402 |
| 23 | Age | 23 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 2 |
| 61% (132-84) | Career Total W/L | 61% (124-78) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Carle VS Cirstea PREDICTION Clay
UniCredit Iasi Open - Iasi wta
18 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Passaro VS Kym PREDICTION Clay
EFG Swiss Open - Gstaad atp
17 Jul 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 1-6 6-0 |
Stats 
Jiaqi Wang
Player
Ikumi Yamazaki
50%
(
34 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
53%
(
18 of
34)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
49%
(
33 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:43:34 | Average Match Time | 1:43:34 |
| 50% (34/68) | 1st Serve % | 67% (46/69) |
| 53% (18/34) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (24/46) |
| 50% (17/34) | 2nd Serve Win % | 26% (6/23) |
| 70% (7/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 56% (5/9) |
| 57% (39/69) | Return Points Win % | 49% (33/68) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Wang vs Yamazaki Match Preview :
- Wang's second serve effectiveness is slightly better, winning 39.54% of points, compared to Yamazaki's 37.62%. Could this be a factor in Wang's favor?
- In return games, Yamazaki outperforms Wang on both first and second serves, with 53.19% and 37.73% points won respectively, indicating a stronger return game strategy.
- Under pressure, Wang has saved more breakpoints (46.51%) compared to Yamazaki (42.68%), suggesting Wang might handle critical moments better.
- Yamazaki's recent performance shows greater match success with a 56.67% win rate over the last year, while Wang's is 46.67%.
- Surface preference could play a role; Wang excels on Clay (64% win rate), yet struggles slightly on Indoor hard courts where both perform below their best.
- Yamazaki often competes at a higher-level circuit, with a 56.67% win rate in more competitive tournaments compared to Wang's 50% at lower-tier events.
- In direct encounters, Wang holds the edge with a past victory over Yamazaki and a better head-to-head set win record.
- Yamazaki tends to perform better in deciding sets across the tour, winning 60% of such instances recently, compared to Wang's 25%.
- Historically, Wang plays against slightly tougher opponents, with an average rank of 368.24 for opponents, compared to Yamazaki's 432.53.
- When converting breakpoints, Wang again has a slight advantage, converting 45.45% of chances compared to Yamazaki's 40.74%.
Editorial Prediction (June 17, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Wang and Yamazaki presents an intriguing contest. Wang has shown superior skills in serving and dealing with high-pressure scenarios, potentially giving her an edge.
Yamazaki, however, boasts a stronger overall performance on return games and plays at a higher competitive level, indicating a robust tournament experience likely to benefit her in crucial moments.
Head-to-head statistics favor Wang, but Yamazaki's recent success and superior performance in deciding sets suggest she might have the momentum to secure the victory.
Taking into account all factors, including recent trends and head-to-head records, Yamazaki appears to have a slight advantage and may be the likelier victor in this upcoming encounter.
Wang vs Yamazaki Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Jiaqi Wang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Yidi Yang
Player
Jiaqi Wang
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
53%
(
47 of
88)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
8%
(
1 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
49%
(
29 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
66
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jiaqi Wang
Player
Yidi Yang
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
53%
(
47 of
88)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
8%
(
1 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
49%
(
29 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
66
Total Points Won
81
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jiaqi Wang
Player
Ni Xi
49%
(
21 of
43)
1st Serve %
51%
(
29 of
57)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
42%
(
18 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jiaqi Wang
Player
Meng Yi Chen
43%
(
43 of
101)
1st Serve %
75%
(
72 of
96)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
53%
(
31 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
42%
(
42 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
96)
104
Total Points Won
93
|
6-7(1) 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Polina Kuharenko
Player
Jiaqi Wang
48%
(
42 of
87)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
5
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
0
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
39%
(
34 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jiaqi Wang
Player
Xiao Tang
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Unknown Player
Player
Jiaqi Wang
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
96)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
44%
(
35 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
52 of
96)
96
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(0) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jiaqi Wang
Player
Zhuoma Ni Ma
49%
(
19 of
39)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
13 of
19)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Ikumi Yamazaki Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Ikumi Yamazaki
Player
Fangran Tian
69%
(
61 of
89)
1st Serve %
70%
(
59 of
84)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
48%
(
43 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
42 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ikumi Yamazaki
Player
Ying Zhang
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ikumi Yamazaki
Player
Mayuka Aikawa
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
81%
(
64 of
79)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
79
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(1) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ikumi Yamazaki
Player
Naomi Xu
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
68%
(
23 of
34)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
26 of
34)
55
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ikumi Yamazaki
Player
Ramu Ueda
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alisa Kummel
Player
Ikumi Yamazaki
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
75%
(
49 of
65)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jiaqi Wang
Player
Ikumi Yamazaki
50%
(
34 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
53%
(
18 of
34)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
49%
(
33 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 1-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yufei Ren
Player
Ikumi Yamazaki
51%
(
32 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (132/84) | Win/Loss | 61% (124/78) |
| 59% (285/202) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (270/188) |
| 55% (2361/1938) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (2219/1929) |
| 61% (109/70) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (56/43) |
| 64% (9/5) | Clay Win/Loss | 68% (46/22) |
| 61% (14/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54% (15/13) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 100% (7/0) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 207 | Aces Total | 136 |
| 0.11 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 226 | Total Double Faults | 537 |
| 1:23:56 | Average Match Time | 1:27:25 |
| 382.83 | Average Opponent Rank | 417.81 |
| 66% (7556/11426) | 1st Serve % | 69% (7540/10944) |
| 59% (4438/7556) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (4348/7540) |
| 46% (1777/3870) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (1486/3404) |
| 50% (765/1542) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (755/1529) |
| 48% (5552/11583) | Return Points Win % | 48% (5370/11173) |
| 0% (0/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (38/33) | Challenger W/L | 60% (91/61) |
| 66% (94/49) | Futures W/L | 66% (33/17) |
| 60% (127/210) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (121/198) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 57% (16/28) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 62% (18/29) |
| 58% (33/57) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (32/55) |
| 88% (131/115) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (112/103) |
| 12% (131/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (112/9) |
| 20% (85/17) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (89/21) |
Wang vs. Yamazaki Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
