Jia Qi Kang vs Naho Sato Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L W W W W L
Form
L W L W L W W L L LHead-to-head: Kang 1 - 0 Sato
They have played 2 sets in total, with Kang winning 2 and Sato winning 0. The last match between Kang and Sato was at the W60 Kyoto, 19-02-2020, First, I.hard with Jia Qi Kang getting the victory 6-3 7-5.
W60 Kyoto(19-02-2020)
6
3
7
5
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Draper VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
15 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Andreeva PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells wta
15 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-5 |
Stats 
Jia Qi Kang
Player
Naho Sato
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
13
Games Won
8
7
Aces (Total)
0
2
Total Double Faults
2
1:15:0
Average Match Time
1:15:0
69% (38/55)
1st Serve %
65% (40/62)
76% (29/38)
1st Serve Win %
60% (24/40)
41% (7/17)
2nd Serve Win %
41% (9/22)
71% (5/7)
Break Points Won % (Total)
67% (2/3)
47% (29/62)
Return Points Win %
35% (19/55)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jia Qi Kang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Indy De Vroome
Player
Jia Qi Kang
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
11
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
47
|
7-6(7) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jia Qi Kang
Player
Tara Moore
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
57)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
13
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jia Qi Kang
Player
Naho Sato
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jia Qi Kang
Player
Ayaka Okuno
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
52%
(
36 of
69)
6
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
5-7 6-2 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jia Qi Kang
Player
Ikumi Yamazaki
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
8
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
6
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bibiane Schoofs
Player
Jia Qi Kang
66%
(
79 of
120)
1st Serve %
64%
(
74 of
115)
9
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
44 of
74)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
42%
(
50 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
47 of
115)
117
Total Points Won
118
|
3-6 7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jia Qi Kang
Player
Moyuka Uchijima
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
71%
(
53 of
75)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
39 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jia Qi Kang
Player
Zeel Desai
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jia Qi Kang
Player
Miyabi Inoue
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
53%
(
18 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 2-6 10-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jia Qi Kang
Player
Robu Kajitani
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Naho Sato Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Thasaporn Naklo
Player
Naho Sato
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aleksandra Krunic
Player
Naho Sato
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
75%
(
43 of
57)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-7(4) 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Naho Sato
Player
Ekaterina Yashina
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
38%
(
19 of
50)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
7
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Naho Sato
Player
Pranjala Yadlapalli
50%
(
27 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
0
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
44%
(
24 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Iryna Shymanovich
Player
Naho Sato
48%
(
44 of
92)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
96)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
6
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
46%
(
22 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
46 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
96)
92
Total Points Won
96
|
1-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Naho Sato
Player
Ariana Geerlings
68%
(
76 of
111)
1st Serve %
56%
(
58 of
104)
0
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
12
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
48%
(
53 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
54 of
104)
112
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anastasia Tikhonova
Player
Naho Sato
53%
(
61 of
116)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
44%
(
24 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
47%
(
55 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
99)
109
Total Points Won
106
|
7-6(6) 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naho Sato
Player
Alice Robbe
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
51%
(
27 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariia Tkacheva
Player
Naho Sato
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
75%
(
38 of
51)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
54% (158/137)
Win/Loss
59% (171/117)
53% (363/319)
Sets Win/Loss
57% (370/274)
52% (3213/2934)
Games Win/Loss
54% (3094/2661)
52% (129/120)
Hard Win/Loss
58% (125/89)
66% (21/11)
Clay Win/Loss
69% (35/16)
57% (8/6)
Indoor Hard W/L
50% (11/11)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/1)
0.16
Aces Per Game
0.04
485
Aces Total
106
0.18
Double Faults Per Game
0.28
547
Total Double Faults
798
1:2:27
Average Match Time
1:30:35
568.07
Average Opponent Rank
480.45
61% (7726/12604)
1st Serve %
66% (11154/16810)
62% (4804/7726)
1st Serve Win %
59% (6623/11154)
45% (2208/4878)
2nd Serve Win %
46% (2598/5656)
46% (699/1528)
Break Points Won % (Total)
52% (1171/2232)
45% (5490/12333)
Return Points Win %
48% (8178/16938)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
23% (3/10)
Main Tour W/L
50% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
49% (92/97)
Challenger W/L
52% (112/102)
68% (63/30)
Futures W/L
81% (58/14)
53% (153/286)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
59% (167/284)
50% (1/2)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
36% (23/64)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
60% (26/43)
48% (47/97)
Deciding Set Win %
56% (40/72)
79% (167/132)
1st Set Won, Won Match
90% (163/147)
20% (167/34)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
10% (163/16)
20% (128/25)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
19% (125/24)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
