Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ji Sung Nam vs Taisei Ichikawa Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nam vs Ichikawa analysis and find out who is favored!
Ji Sung Nam vs Taisei Ichikawa Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nam has won 47.39% of points on his second serve, while Ichikawa has won 51.25%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nam, in recent form, has won 51.78% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ichikawa has won 48.02%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.55% and 35.15% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nam has saved 58.65% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ichikawa has saved 58.59% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nam has won 43.33% of matches played (W/L 13/ 17), with Ichikawa winning 58% (W/L 29/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nam has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 229/ 168), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Ichikawa has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 21/ 17), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Nam has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 12/ 15), where as Ichikawa has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 59.09% of matches (W/L 26/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Nam winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Nam winning 2 and Ichikawa winning 2. The last match between Nam and Ichikawa was at the Yokohama Challenger, 29-10-2022, Q1 round, Hard with Taisei Ichikawa getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:38:9.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nam and Ichikawa have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nam winning 0 times and Ichikawa 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Nam winning 0, and Ichikawa 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nam has played against opponents with an average rank of 316.33 while Ichikawa has played against players with an average rank of 132.16.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nam has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ichikawa has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nam has converted 36.36% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ichikawa has converted 40.44% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nam 1 - 1 Ichikawa
674
Rank
236
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
703
Rank
686
High
23
Age
L
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
56% (276-213)
Career Total W/L
51% (95-93)
33% (2-4)
YTD W/L
56% (5-4)
$1,445
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Ji Sung Nam | Taisei Ichikawa |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 24 | 21 |
| Aces (Total) | 9 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 12 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:38:9 | 1:38:9 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (102/157) | 64% (109/169) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (69/102) | 67% (73/109) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (26/55) | 40% (24/60) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 35% (7/20) | 33% (5/15) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (72/169) | 39% (62/157) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(8) 7-5 |
Stats 
Taisei Ichikawa
Player
Ji Sung Nam
66%
(
62 of
94)
1st Serve %
70%
(
68 of
97)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
40 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
97)
100
Total Points Won
91
|
||||
| 7-5 6-2 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Taisei Ichikawa
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ji Sung Nam | Taisei Ichikawa |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 33% (2/4) | 56% (5/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 31% (4/9) | 52% (11/10) |
| Games Win/Loss | 43% (55/72) | 51% (108/105) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 56% (5/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.13 | 0.32 |
| Aces Total | 8 | 33 |
| DFs per game | 0.41 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 25 | 25 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:45 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 175.17 | 103 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (233/390) | 63% (431/684) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (155/233) | 70% (302/431) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (70/157) | 53% (134/253) |
| BPs Won% Total | 33% (15/46) | 37% (22/60) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (171/441) | 37% (255/682) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (1/2) | 60% (3/2) |
| Futures W/L | 33% (1/2) | 50% (2/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (2/6) | 56% (5/9) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 60% (3/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 67% (2/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 100% (4/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (4/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (4/0) | 20% (5/1) |
Ji Sung Nam Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Ji Sung Nam
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Otto Virtanen
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Ji Sung Nam
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Ji Sung Nam
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Takuya Kumasaka
56%
(
57 of
102)
1st Serve %
65%
(
79 of
122)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
51 of
79)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
53 of
122)
112
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(6) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Bolt
Player
Ji Sung Nam
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
80)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kaichi Uchida
Player
Ji Sung Nam
57%
(
76 of
134)
1st Serve %
57%
(
59 of
104)
1
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
50%
(
29 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
43%
(
57 of
134)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
104)
121
Total Points Won
117
|
7-6(6) 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Calum Puttergill
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
8
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
86)
93
Total Points Won
63
|
4-6 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Fajing Sun
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rinky Hijikata
Player
Ji Sung Nam
65%
(
87 of
134)
1st Serve %
66%
(
92 of
139)
5
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
58 of
87)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
62 of
92)
45%
(
21 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
16 of
47)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
41%
(
55 of
134)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
61 of
139)
140
Total Points Won
133
|
6-7(5) 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Taisei Ichikawa Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Orel Kimhi
Player
Taisei Ichikawa
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
94)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
71%
(
22 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
28 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
94)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 6-7(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taisei Ichikawa
Player
Siwanat Auytayakul
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
73%
(
38 of
52)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yan Bai
Player
Taisei Ichikawa
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taisei Ichikawa
Player
Tao Mu
77%
(
79 of
103)
1st Serve %
63%
(
76 of
121)
10
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
7
78%
(
62 of
79)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
51 of
76)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
30 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
45 of
121)
118
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(2) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Taisei Ichikawa
67%
(
60 of
89)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
9
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
12%
(
2 of
17)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
31%
(
28 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Taisei Ichikawa
Player
Thomas Braithwaite
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
20 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Taisei Ichikawa
Player
Scott Jones
68%
(
61 of
90)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
96)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
33%
(
30 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Scott Jones
Player
Taisei Ichikawa
49%
(
34 of
69)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Taisei Ichikawa
Player
Corban Crowther
53%
(
31 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jay Dylan Hara Friend
Player
Taisei Ichikawa
46%
(
21 of
46)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Nam Vs Ichikawa Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
