P. B. Biryukov
To Win
S. Purtseladze
To Win
Ji Sung Nam vs Petr Bar Biryukov Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L L L W W W L
Form
L L W L W L W W L LHead-To-Head: Nam 0 - 1 Biryukov
They have played 2 sets in total, with Nam winning 1 and Biryukov winning 1. The last match between Nam and Biryukov was at the Gwangju Challenger, 20-04-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Hard, with Petr Bar Biryukov getting the victory 6-7(2) 5-1 ret..
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ji Sung Nam | 0 |
| Petr Bar Biryukov | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Gwangju Challenger(20-04-2025)
Petr Bar Biryukov
Ji Sung Nam
6
7
5
1
| Nam | Stats | Biryukov |
|---|---|---|
| 56% (9-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 62% (21-13) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 809 | Ranking | 346 |
| 236 | Highest Rank | 339 |
| 31 | Age | 23 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 5 | Titles | 4 |
| 56% (297-232) | Career Total W/L | 60% (137-91) |
| $1,445 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Volynets VS Garland PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kostyuk VS Bejlek PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(2) 5-1 ret. |
Stats 
Petr Bar Biryukov
Player
Ji Sung Nam
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
14
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
66)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 8 | Games Won | 11 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 14 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:2:53 | Average Match Time | 1:2:53 |
| 62% (41/66) | 1st Serve % | 57% (28/49) |
| 63% (26/41) | 1st Serve Win % | 93% (26/28) |
| 60% (15/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 57% (12/21) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 29% (2/7) |
| 22% (11/49) | Return Points Win % | 38% (25/66) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nam vs Biryukov Match Preview :
In a comprehensive analysis of the upcoming tennis match, recent performance metrics offer significant insights. Nam, over the last year, has a match win rate of 51.43% (18 wins and 17 losses), whereas Biryukov boasts a more impressive 70.89% (56 wins and 23 losses). When examining career surface performance, both players demonstrate their prowess primarily on hard courts, with Nam achieving a 58% win percentage (245 wins, 180 losses), while Biryukov has secured a 65% win record (104 wins, 55 losses). This suggests that both individuals will deliver competitive play.
Second serve effectiveness is another critical factor in this head-to-head matchup. Nam has conquered only 33.44% of points on their second serve in recent months, contrasting with Biryukov's 49.59% success rate. Return game performance further separates the two, with Nam winning 49.7% of opponent's second serve points and Biryukov securing 45.49% in similar circumstances. Nam's first serve return stands at 32.35%, while Biryukov's 22.69% implies a weaker component in his game.
Under pressure, Biryukov outperforms Nam with a breakpoint save percentage of 56.6%, compared to Nam's 41.54%. Additionally, when matches extend to a deciding set over the past year, Nam emerges victorious 55% of the time, while Biryukov outdoes this with a 64% success rate. In terms of breakpoint conversion, Nam is ahead, having exploited 45.57% of opportunities, while Biryukov falls behind with 25.73%.
Considering match level and opposition quality, Nam predominantly competes in Challengers and ITF events > $10K, achieving a 50% win rate (12 wins, 12 losses). In contrast, Biryukov plays mostly in Futures and Satellites events at $10K level, enjoying a commanding 78.72% win rate (37 wins, 10 losses). Opponent rankings provide additional context, with Nam facing players averaging a rank of 393.14 compared to Biryukov's lower tier opponents average rank of 427.91.
Taking into account these statistical comparisons, particularly Biryukov's superior win rates, second serve reliability, and performance under pressure, predictions lean toward Biryukov as the favorite to claim victory in this encounter.
Nam vs Biryukov Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Ji Sung Nam Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Sanhui Shin
Player
Ji Sung Nam
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
19 of
51)
54
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 4-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Sung Woo Cho
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
45%
(
38 of
85)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
6
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Hoyoung Roh
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
51%
(
41 of
81)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
40)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
81)
90
Total Points Won
66
|
6-1 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Ku Keon Kang
51%
(
48 of
94)
1st Serve %
78%
(
74 of
95)
3
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
1
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
41 of
74)
43%
(
20 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
41 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Petr Bar Biryukov
Player
Ji Sung Nam
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
14
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
66)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-7(2) 5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
.jpg)
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
Player
Ji Sung Nam
51%
(
37 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
48 of
76)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
83
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryo Tabata
Player
Ji Sung Nam
62%
(
53 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
39 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Takuya Kumasaka
Player
Ji Sung Nam
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
91)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
41 of
53)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
11 of
38)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
6-1 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Petr Bar Biryukov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Petr Bar Biryukov
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
2
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
96%
(
25 of
26)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
8 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ryan Peniston
Player
Petr Bar Biryukov
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
5
Aces
11
0
Double Faults
6
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
16 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Petr Bar Biryukov
Player
Philip Henning
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
91%
(
31 of
34)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
11 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
16 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petr Bar Biryukov
Player
Aleksandre Shvangiradze
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
16
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Uisung Park
Player
Petr Bar Biryukov
54%
(
52 of
97)
1st Serve %
59%
(
65 of
111)
7
Aces
17
4
Double Faults
10
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
53 of
65)
60%
(
27 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
32 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
40 of
111)
105
Total Points Won
103
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Petr Bar Biryukov
Player
Ji Sung Nam
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
14
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
66)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-7(2) 5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Petr Bar Biryukov
53%
(
39 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
52 of
91)
6
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
9
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
22 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
69
|
6-7(5) 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Petr Bar Biryukov
Player
Kasidit Samrej
57%
(
70 of
122)
1st Serve %
68%
(
86 of
127)
17
Aces
5
10
Double Faults
7
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
62 of
86)
58%
(
30 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
43 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
48 of
127)
127
Total Points Won
122
|
6-4 6-7(10) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (297/232) | Win/Loss | 60% (137/91) |
| 56% (667/532) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (305/217) |
| 52% (5807/5300) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (2683/2409) |
| 58% (248/182) | Hard Win/Loss | 65% (107/58) |
| 51% (28/27) | Clay Win/Loss | 36% (12/21) |
| 49% (20/21) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (18/12) |
| 33% (1/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.68 |
| 983 | Aces Total | 1692 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.37 |
| 930 | Total Double Faults | 918 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:18:45 |
| 570.06 | Average Opponent Rank | 363.14 |
| 65% (13717/21078) | 1st Serve % | 61% (8112/13320) |
| 68% (9262/13717) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (5952/8112) |
| 49% (3584/7361) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (2611/5208) |
| 44% (1099/2481) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (462/1134) |
| 43% (9419/22076) | Return Points Win % | 37% (4835/13184) |
| 0% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (3/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 20% (1/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (105/105) | Challenger W/L | 54% (20/17) |
| 61% (188/119) | Futures W/L | 61% (117/74) |
| 56% (289/515) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (135/222) |
| 100% (4/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 53% (72/136) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 63% (53/84) |
| 48% (71/148) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (37/68) |
| 86% (294/253) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (142/121) |
| 14% (294/40) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (142/21) |
| 19% (234/44) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (86/15) |
Nam vs. Biryukov Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
