Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ji Sung Nam vs Dennis Novak Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nam vs Novak analysis and find out who is favored!
Ji Sung Nam vs Dennis Novak Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nam has won 46.28% of points on his second serve, while Novak has won 47.25%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nam, in recent form, has won 53.52% of his opponent's second serve points, while Novak has won 51.43%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.92% and 33.02% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nam has saved 57.02% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Novak has saved 61.71% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nam has won 45.16% of matches played (W/L 14/ 17), with Novak winning 56.25% (W/L 36/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nam has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 229/ 168), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Novak has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 69% (W/L 115/ 51), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 77/ 63).
- Player level: In the last year, Nam has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.43% of matches (W/L 13/ 15), where as Novak has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.77% of matches (W/L 29/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nam winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nam winning 0 and Novak winning 2. The last match between Nam and Novak was at the Davis Cup, Qualifiers, 1R, KOR-AUT 3-1, 04-03-2022, Rubber 1, I.hard with Dennis Novak getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:56:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nam and Novak have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nam winning 0 times and Novak 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nam winning 0, and Novak 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nam has played against opponents with an average rank of 315.42 while Novak has played against players with an average rank of 316.41.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nam has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Novak has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nam has converted 37.72% of breakpoint opportunities, and Novak has converted 41.51% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nam 0 - 1 Novak
708
Rank
236
High
30
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
217
Rank
85
High
30
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
56% (276-213)
Career Total W/L
63% (484-288)
33% (2-4)
YTD W/L
50% (9-9)
$1,445
Career Prize Money
$797,895
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Ji Sung Nam | Dennis Novak |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 5 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:56:0 | 0:56:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (26/43) | 66% (29/44) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (18/26) | 86% (25/29) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 41% (7/17) | 80% (12/15) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 50% (3/6) |
| Return Points W% | 16% (7/44) | 42% (18/43) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats 
Dennis Novak
Player
Ji Sung Nam
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
16%
(
7 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ji Sung Nam | Dennis Novak |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 33% (2/4) | 50% (9/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 31% (4/9) | 51% (20/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 43% (55/72) | 51% (181/173) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 50% (5/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.13 | 0.28 |
| Aces Total | 8 | 49 |
| DFs per game | 0.41 | 0.27 |
| DFs Total | 25 | 46 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:45 | 1:24:10 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 175.17 | 358.39 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (233/390) | 68% (753/1100) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (155/233) | 67% (508/753) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (70/157) | 49% (170/347) |
| BPs Won% Total | 33% (15/46) | 41% (50/122) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (171/441) | 40% (439/1108) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (1/2) | 50% (9/9) |
| Futures W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (2/6) | 53% (9/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (2/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 50% (2/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 88% (8/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 13% (8/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (4/0) | 20% (10/2) |
Ji Sung Nam Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Ji Sung Nam
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Otto Virtanen
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Ji Sung Nam
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Ji Sung Nam
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Takuya Kumasaka
56%
(
57 of
102)
1st Serve %
65%
(
79 of
122)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
51 of
79)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
53 of
122)
112
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(6) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Bolt
Player
Ji Sung Nam
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
80)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kaichi Uchida
Player
Ji Sung Nam
57%
(
76 of
134)
1st Serve %
57%
(
59 of
104)
1
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
50%
(
29 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
43%
(
57 of
134)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
104)
121
Total Points Won
117
|
7-6(6) 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Calum Puttergill
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
8
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
86)
93
Total Points Won
63
|
4-6 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Fajing Sun
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rinky Hijikata
Player
Ji Sung Nam
65%
(
87 of
134)
1st Serve %
66%
(
92 of
139)
5
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
58 of
87)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
62 of
92)
45%
(
21 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
16 of
47)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
41%
(
55 of
134)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
61 of
139)
140
Total Points Won
133
|
6-7(5) 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Dennis Novak Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Franco Agamenone
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Giustino
Player
Dennis Novak
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve %
62%
(
24 of
39)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
13 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
48
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Dennis Novak
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
69%
(
60 of
87)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
87)
78
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
78%
(
69 of
89)
1st Serve %
69%
(
64 of
93)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
93)
99
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Noah Regas Luis
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve %
45%
(
19 of
42)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
13 of
19)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
51
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Timofey Skatov
Player
Dennis Novak
78%
(
83 of
106)
1st Serve %
71%
(
75 of
105)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
59 of
83)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
51 of
75)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
32 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
38 of
105)
112
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(5) 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Dennis Novak
47%
(
27 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jules Marie
Player
Dennis Novak
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Alexis Galarneau
79%
(
71 of
90)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
94)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
26%
(
5 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
43%
(
39 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
94)
92
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Nam Vs Novak Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Dennis Novak
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
