Jessica Pegula vs Bernarda Pera Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W L W L W L
Form
L L W W L W L W L LHead-2-Head: Pegula 3 - 0 Pera
They have played 7 sets in total, with Pegula winning 6 and Pera winning 1. The last match between Pegula and Pera was at the Miami Open - Miami, 21-03-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Hard, with Jessica Pegula getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jessica Pegula | 3 |
| Bernarda Pera | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Miami Open - Miami(21-03-2025)
Jessica Pegula
Bernarda Pera
6
4
6
4
| Pegula | Stats | Pera |
|---|---|---|
| 76% (28-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 44% (11-14) |
| 3 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 4 | Ranking | 77 |
| 3 | Highest Rank | 27 |
| 31 | Age | 30 |
| R | Plays | L |
| 9 | Titles | 11 |
| 64% (461-254) | Career Total W/L | 61% (436-276) |
| $12,693,079 | Career Prize Money | $2,611,083 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 3 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sinner VS Paul PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome atp
16 May 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Alcaraz VS Musetti PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome atp
16 May 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Jessica Pegula
Player
Bernarda Pera
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
| 4-6 6-2 6-3 |
Stats
Jessica Pegula
Player
Bernarda Pera
61%
(
68 of
112)
1st Serve %
67%
(
68 of
101)
7
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
29%
(
6 of
21)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
43%
(
48 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
101)
111
Total Points Won
102
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Jessica Pegula
Player
Bernarda Pera
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 40 | Games Won | 27 |
| 10 | Aces (Total) | 14 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 11 |
| 1:36:45 | Average Match Time | 1:36:45 |
| 61% (150/245) | 1st Serve % | 66% (147/224) |
| 65% (98/150) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (88/147) |
| 57% (54/95) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (38/77) |
| 39% (12/31) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 21% (5/24) |
| 44% (98/224) | Return Points Win % | 38% (93/245) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Pegula vs Pera Match Preview :
In examining recent performances, Jessica Pegula and Bernarda Pera demonstrate closely matched skills, yet Pegula slightly leads in several key statistics that could influence the outcome of their upcoming encounter. Over the past six months, Pegula has shown a marginal advantage over Pera when it comes to second serve points, securing 42.1% compared to Pera's 41.6%, a statistic with notable predictive value in match outcomes. The same trend is seen in breakpoint conversion, where Pegula converts 39.09% of opportunities, while Pera manages 34.11%. These metrics suggest Pegula's ability to capitalize on critical moments during a match.
When considering their ability to return serve, Pera outperforms Pegula by winning 48.75% of points on her opponents' second serves compared to Pegula's 46.43%. However, Pegula compensates for this with a better return on first serves at 29.65%, as opposed to Pera's 28.19%. The blend of serve and return capabilities makes Pegula slightly more robust in these all-important exchanges. Equally crucial is their capacity to withstand pressure, with Pera being slightly more adept, saving 52.4% of breakpoints faced, compared to Pegula's 46.38%.
On a broader level, Pegula holds a considerable edge regarding match victories, notching up a win rate of 73.85% over the past year, overshadowing Pera's 59.62%. Such a stark contrast in match success suggests Pegula's superior consistency and ability to prevail in matches across various tournaments. This dominance is further reflected in their head-to-head record, as Pegula has triumphed in both of their previous encounters, winning four out of the five sets played. Their most recent clash, held on hard courts, saw Pegula emerge victorious, reinforcing her proficiency on such surfaces.
Surface preferences offer another dimension to the prediction. Pera shines on clay with a 71% career win rate but struggles significantly on grass, while Pegula's hard-court success is dominant, winning 67% of matches on that surface. These preferences align with the playing conditions of many major tournaments and Pegula's strategic advantages on hard courts contribute further to her favored status in their matchup.
Despite similarities in Masters series participation over the past year, with Pegula securing a slight edge in win rate, the level of competition they have faced differs significantly. Pegula's opponents have an average rank of 57.91, compared to Pera's 124.19, indicating Pegula's experience against more formidable foes. In deciding set showdowns, Pera boasts a higher win percentage at 67%, yet Pegula’s overall tour experience reinforces her as the likely victor in high-stakes scenarios.
Though head-to-head encounters and granular statistics tell a story of closely matched competitors, Jessica Pegula's broader match success, surface adaptability, and historical prowess against Bernarda Pera position her as the probable winner in their imminent clash. While Pera’s resilience under pressure and clay court record are admirable, Pegula's consistent performance at a higher competitive level and past victories suggest she will likely emerge triumphant once again.
Pegula vs Pera Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Jessica Pegula Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Jessica Pegula
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jessica Pegula
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
48%
(
30 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Jessica Pegula
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jessica Pegula
Player
Eva Lys
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ekaterina Alexandrova
Player
Jessica Pegula
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
50%
(
37 of
74)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
51
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jessica Pegula
Player
Magdalena Frech
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve %
44%
(
19 of
43)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
17%
(
6 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jessica Pegula
Player
Sofia Kenin
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
27 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
44 of
78)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jessica Pegula
Player
Ekaterina Alexandrova
67%
(
66 of
99)
1st Serve %
56%
(
60 of
107)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
7
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
47%
(
47 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
54 of
107)
106
Total Points Won
100
|
6-2 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Bernarda Pera Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Xiyu Wang
Player
Bernarda Pera
69%
(
61 of
89)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
39 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
90
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Beatriz Haddad Maia
Player
Bernarda Pera
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
90)
4
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
6
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
90)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
2-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernarda Pera
Player
Jana Fett
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
62%
(
47 of
76)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maria Lourdes Carle
Player
Bernarda Pera
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bernarda Pera
Player
Ruth Roura Llaverias
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
11
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Bernarda Pera
65%
(
76 of
117)
1st Serve %
70%
(
66 of
94)
9
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
7
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
47 of
66)
34%
(
14 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
49 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
94)
105
Total Points Won
106
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Bernarda Pera
Player
Rebecca Sramkova
117%
(
70 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
5
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
1
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Bernarda Pera
Player
Johanne Svendsen
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve %
116%
(
57 of
49)
9
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (461/254) | Win/Loss | 61% (436/276) |
| 62% (1013/628) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (991/668) |
| 55% (8290/6902) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (8311/6975) |
| 67% (271/131) | Hard Win/Loss | 50% (118/118) |
| 62% (125/77) | Clay Win/Loss | 70% (253/109) |
| 59% (36/25) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61% (51/33) |
| 58% (29/21) | Grass Win/Loss | 47% (14/16) |
| 0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.21 |
| 1326 | Aces Total | 1541 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
| 1499 | Total Double Faults | 2206 |
| 1:11:17 | Average Match Time | 1:5:17 |
| 381.58 | Average Opponent Rank | 421.19 |
| 59% (22842/38684) | 1st Serve % | 61% (20446/33644) |
| 65% (14787/22842) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (13363/20423) |
| 49% (7696/15841) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (6076/13236) |
| 47% (2310/4905) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (1845/3973) |
| 46% (17687/38589) | Return Points Win % | 44% (14812/33560) |
| 65% (66/36) | Slam W/L | 44% (25/32) |
| 66% (100/52) | Masters W/L | 53% (58/52) |
| 83% (5/1) | Cups W/L | 100% (2/0) |
| 66% (116/60) | Main Tour W/L | 51% (87/83) |
| 62% (161/99) | Challenger W/L | 66% (158/81) |
| 68% (13/6) | Futures W/L | 79% (106/28) |
| 64% (453/706) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (431/704) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 58% (100/171) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (82/157) |
| 55% (120/219) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (118/244) |
| 87% (457/398) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (435/372) |
| 13% (457/59) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (435/63) |
| 24% (257/62) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (277/62) |
Pegula vs. Pera Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
