Jessica Hinojosa Gomez vs Caitlin Whoriskey Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gomez vs Whoriskey analysis and find out who is favored!
Jessica Hinojosa Gomez vs Caitlin Whoriskey Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gomez has won 41.76% of points on his second serve, while Whoriskey has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gomez, in recent form, has won 57.85% of his opponent's second serve points, while Whoriskey has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.48% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gomez has saved 50.36% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Whoriskey has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gomez has won 50% of matches played (W/L 19/ 19), with Whoriskey winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gomez has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 14/ 8), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 42% (W/L 45/ 61). Whoriskey has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 113/ 68), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Gomez has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 19/ 19), where as Whoriskey has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gomez winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Gomez winning 0 and Whoriskey winning 2. The last match between Gomez and Whoriskey was at the Waco, 07-11-2016, Q2 round, Hard with Caitlin Whoriskey getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gomez and Whoriskey have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gomez winning 0 times and Whoriskey 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gomez winning 0, and Whoriskey 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gomez has played against opponents with an average rank of 183.58 while Whoriskey has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gomez has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Whoriskey has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gomez has converted 40.97% of breakpoint opportunities, and Whoriskey has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gomez 0 - 1 Whoriskey
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
775
Rank
679
High
26
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
268
High
36
Age
Plays
2
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
Form
46% (59-69)
Career Total W/L
57% (203-152)
29% (2-5)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$14,356
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Jessica Hinojosa Gomez | Caitlin Whoriskey |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
Games Won | 5 | 12 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-3 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Jessica Hinojosa Gomez | Caitlin Whoriskey |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 29% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 39% (7/11) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 43% (72/94) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.01 | 0 |
Aces Total | 1 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.28 | 0 |
DFs Total | 23 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:26:45 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 263.86 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 60% (229/381) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 55% (127/229) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 39% (59/152) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 38% (20/53) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 43% (170/393) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 29% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (2/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 33% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 67% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 25% (4/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Jessica Hinojosa Gomez Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Suzan Lamens
Player
Jessica Hinojosa Gomez
53%
(
37 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
6%
(
1 of
16)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
51%
(
36 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jessica Hinojosa Gomez
Player
Carol Zhao
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
0
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
11
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
7%
(
1 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Maria Kononova
Player
Jessica Hinojosa Gomez
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
45%
(
26 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 1-6 10-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 3-6 6-3 10-4 | H2H | |||
QF |
Iryna Shymanovich
Player
Jessica Hinojosa Gomez
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
86)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
46 of
86)
86
Total Points Won
68
|
5-7 6-2 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Alana Smith
Player
Jessica Hinojosa Gomez
48%
(
28 of
58)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
7
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Jessica Hinojosa Gomez
68%
(
59 of
87)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
36%
(
31 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
89
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Amy Zhu
Player
Jessica Hinojosa Gomez
63%
(
56 of
89)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
39%
(
35 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(1) 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jessica Hinojosa Gomez
Player
Natalia Castaneda Guerrero
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
47%
(
21 of
45)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Fanny Ostlund
Player
Jessica Hinojosa Gomez
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve %
75%
(
36 of
48)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Caitlin Whoriskey Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Usue Maitane Arconada
Player
Caitlin Whoriskey
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Shelby Talcott
Player
Caitlin Whoriskey
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
50%
(
36 of
72)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
8
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
6-1 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Genevieve Lorbergs
Player
Caitlin Whoriskey
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
33 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
87)
84
Total Points Won
78
|
1-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Salma Ewing
Player
Caitlin Whoriskey
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
3
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
2
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
48%
(
22 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
45%
(
46 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
92
Total Points Won
89
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Caitlin Whoriskey
Player
Francesca Fusinato
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
28 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
84
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-7(3) 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(2) 1-6 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Katherine Sebov
Player
Caitlin Whoriskey
65%
(
70 of
108)
1st Serve %
75%
(
85 of
113)
7
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
57 of
85)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
37%
(
40 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
45 of
113)
113
Total Points Won
108
|
4-6 7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
QF |
Anhelina Kalinina
Player
Caitlin Whoriskey
66%
(
59 of
89)
1st Serve %
65%
(
75 of
115)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
41 of
75)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
58 of
115)
113
Total Points Won
91
|
6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Caitlin Whoriskey
Player
Usue Maitane Arconada
62%
(
58 of
93)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
7
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
34%
(
12 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
47%
(
44 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
91
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more