Jessica Bouzas Maneiro vs Julia Grabher Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan

Form
W L W L W W L W W L
Form
L W W W W L L W W LHead To Head: Maneiro 3 - 1 Grabher
They have played 9 sets in total, with Maneiro winning 6 and Grabher winning 3. The last match between Maneiro and Grabher was at the Grand Prix De SAR La Princesse Lalla Meryem - Rabat, 19-05-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Jessica Bouzas Maneiro getting the victory 6-3 1-6 6-4.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro | 3 |
Julia Grabher | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Grand Prix De SAR La Princesse Lalla Meryem - Rabat(19-05-2025)
Maneiro | Stats | Grabher |
---|---|---|
52% (15-14) | YTD Win/Loss | 67% (32-16) |
3 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
60 | Ranking | 142 |
52 | Highest Rank | 54 |
22 | Age | 28 |
- | Plays | - |
12 | Titles | 17 |
66% (239-125) | Career Total W/L | 60% (396-261) |
$877,490 | Career Prize Money | $402,254 |
0 | YTD Titles | 3 |
3 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Alcaraz VS Clar PREDICTION Grass
cinch Championships - London atp
19 Jun 2025 / Second
Shapovalov VS Cobolli PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
18 Jun 2025 / Second
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 1-6 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Julia Grabher
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
59%
(
52 of
88)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
45%
(
41 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
88
|
||||
6-4 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Julia Grabher
Player
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
48%
(
33 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
6-3 2-1 ret. |
![]() ![]()
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Julia Grabher
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
27%
(
3 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
45%
(
18 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
48
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
6-3 6-3 |
![]() ![]()
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Julia Grabher
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
41
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
3 | H2H Matches | 1 |
6 | Sets Won | 3 |
41 | Games Won | 35 |
1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
9 | Total Double Faults | 16 |
1:30:5 | Average Match Time | 1:30:5 |
66% (159/241) | 1st Serve % | 61% (154/251) |
65% (103/159) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (90/154) |
35% (29/82) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (39/97) |
47% (18/38) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (15/32) |
49% (122/251) | Return Points Win % | 45% (109/241) |
75% (3/4) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 25% (1/4) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
0% (3/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (3/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Maneiro vs Grabher Match Preview :
- Recent performance on second serve: In the past six months, Maneiro has secured 42.7% of points on their second serve compared to Grabher's 38.47%. Could this small edge be crucial in predicting the match outcome?
- Return game efficiency: Maneiro has captured 50.16% of opponent's second serve points, while Grabher has managed 45.11%. On first serve returns, the stats are 38.05% for Maneiro and 29.53% for Grabher. Does this suggest Maneiro has a stronger return game?
- Breakpoint resilience: Under pressure, Grabher slightly outperforms by saving 45.51% of breakpoints against Maneiro's 43.85%. Could this be a key advantage during critical moments?
- Overall performance: Over the last year, Grabher has a superior win rate at 64.38%, whereas Maneiro's is at 52.73%. Does this reflect consistency over a broader range of matches?
- Surface strengths: Maneiro has a 67% win rate on Indoor Hard, while Grabher excels on Clay with 65%. How does surface preference impact head-to-head outcomes on different courts?
- Professional level play: Maneiro features mainly on the Main tour with a 47.62% win rate, whereas Grabher competes predominantly in Challengers/ITF circuits, winning 75.86%. Could the level of competition faced influence their preparation?
- Direct encounters: In three head-to-heads, Maneiro leads 2-1. Their most recent match ended in favor of Grabher on Clay. Does current form or past victories play a bigger role?
- Competitive consistency: Both players have yet to battle through deciding sets or tiebreaks against each other. Does this history suggest potential parity in high-pressure situations?
- Opponent quality: In the past year, Maneiro's opponents had an average rank of 127.55, while Grabher’s opponents averaged 296.15. Does this indicate Maneiro faces tougher competition regularly?
- If the match extends to a deciding set, Maneiro's 56% success rate surpasses Grabher's 50%. Could this hint at Maneiro's ability to handle extended contests better?
- Breakpoint conversion: Maneiro converts 39.27% of break opportunities, slightly higher than Grabher's 36.71%. Is this enough of an advantage during critical match junctures?
Editorial Prediction (May 19, 2025, UTC):
As Maneiro and Grabher face off once more, several factors could determine the outcome. Maneiro’s slightly higher efficiency on second serve and return games suggests a potential edge in foundational play. Additionally, facing tougher competitors on average might have better prepared Maneiro for high-pressure scenarios.
On the other hand, Grabher's recent victory on their favorable surface, coupled with a slightly better breakpoint saving capability, highlights their ability to capitalize on critical moments. With better overall win rates in the past year, Grabher’s consistency cannot be overlooked.
The history of matchups between the two brings parity as neither has played extended matches with many tiebreaks or deciding sets. However, if the match does stretch long, Maneiro’s performance in deciding sets could prove decisive.
Taking all factors into account, while both players have their distinct strengths, the slight technical and competitive experiences suggest Maneiro has a small advantage to clinch the match.
Maneiro vs Grabher Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Hailey Baptiste
Player
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Robin Montgomery
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
98)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
38 of
67)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
43%
(
40 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
48 of
98)
102
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Emma Navarro
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
13 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Ajla Tomljanovic
Player
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
55%
(
18 of
33)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
48%
(
25 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Sada Nahimana
64%
(
58 of
91)
1st Serve %
63%
(
53 of
84)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Julia Grabher
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
59%
(
52 of
88)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
45%
(
41 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Elina Svitolina
Player
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
63%
(
59 of
93)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
8
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
43 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
84
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Ann Li
72%
(
71 of
99)
1st Serve %
61%
(
61 of
100)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
47%
(
47 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
49 of
100)
101
Total Points Won
98
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(3) | H2H |
view more
Julia Grabher Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Barbora Palicova
Player
Julia Grabher
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Julia Grabher
Player
Federica Urgesi
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
42%
(
20 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
47
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Julia Grabher
Player
Despina Papamichail
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Ena Shibahara
Player
Julia Grabher
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Kaja Juvan
Player
Julia Grabher
59%
(
48 of
82)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(1) 7-5 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Julia Grabher
Player
Caty McNally
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
79%
(
33 of
42)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
50
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Julia Grabher
Player
Kyoka Okamura
81%
(
55 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Julia Grabher
Player
Anouk Koevermans
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
47
Total Points Won
42
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H |
view more

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
66% (239/125) | Win/Loss | 60% (396/261) |
63% (516/300) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (875/613) |
56% (4129/3297) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (7262/6187) |
63% (71/41) | Hard Win/Loss | 45% (30/36) |
67% (149/73) | Clay Win/Loss | 65% (346/185) |
64% (14/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 35% (19/36) |
63% (5/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) |
0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
249 | Aces Total | 689 |
0.4 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.38 |
1452 | Total Double Faults | 2458 |
1:30:36 | Average Match Time | 1:21:51 |
379.52 | Average Opponent Rank | 473.7 |
66% (15078/22857) | 1st Serve % | 65% (23813/36828) |
59% (8948/15051) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (14817/23813) |
44% (3466/7813) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (5801/13013) |
50% (1707/3405) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (2383/4864) |
50% (11582/23146) | Return Points Win % | 47% (17571/37441) |
55% (12/10) | Slam W/L | 37% (10/17) |
35% (7/13) | Masters W/L | 47% (8/9) |
100% (2/0) | Cups W/L | 32% (7/15) |
46% (13/15) | Main Tour W/L | 34% (20/38) |
67% (142/70) | Challenger W/L | 63% (255/149) |
79% (63/17) | Futures W/L | 74% (96/33) |
66% (237/358) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (389/644) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
57% (36/63) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (64/130) |
57% (54/95) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (96/181) |
89% (232/207) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (386/345) |
10% (232/24) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (386/40) |
24% (131/31) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (271/53) |
Maneiro vs. Grabher Prediction Form Trend:

Other Predictions
- Loading news...