V. Vacherot
To Win
C. Taberner
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W L W L W W LForm
W W W W L W W W W LThey have played 5 sets in total, with Jong winning 2 and Vacherot winning 3. The last match between Jong and Vacherot was at the Murcia Challenger, 20-03-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Clay, with Jesper De Jong getting the victory 6-3 3-6 7-5.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Jesper De Jong | 1 |
Valentin Vacherot | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Murcia Challenger(20-03-2025)
Jong | Stats | Vacherot |
---|---|---|
53% (17-15) | YTD Win/Loss | 65% (22-12) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
87 | Ranking | 234 |
87 | Highest Rank | 110 |
24 | Age | 26 |
R | Plays | - |
7 | Titles | 11 |
63% (270-162) | Career Total W/L | 65% (256-137) |
$601,955 | Career Prize Money | $282,695 |
1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
20 May 2025 / Q1 round
French Open - Paris atp
19 May 2025 / Q1 round
Internationaux de Strasbourg - Strasbourg wta
19 May 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 3-6 7-5 |
![]() ![]()
Jesper De Jong
Player
Valentin Vacherot
57%
(
52 of
92)
1st Serve %
69%
(
72 of
104)
5
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
72)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
40 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
48 of
104)
100
Total Points Won
96
|
||||
6-2 6-3 |
![]() ![]()
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Jesper De Jong
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
41
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
2 | Sets Won | 3 |
21 | Games Won | 26 |
9 | Aces (Total) | 13 |
7 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
1:50:52 | Average Match Time | 1:50:52 |
59% (83/140) | 1st Serve % | 67% (102/153) |
66% (55/83) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (68/102) |
40% (23/57) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (22/51) |
50% (7/14) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 56% (9/16) |
41% (63/153) | Return Points Win % | 44% (62/140) |
50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
As the stage is set for another enthralling encounter, one can't help but dissect the numbers that might predict the fate of this upcoming battle. In what aspect does Jong shine brighter than Vacherot, and where might Vacherot hold an edge? Second serve performance could very well be a determining factor here. In the past six months, Jong has clinched 46.26% of points on his second serve, presenting a narrow advantage over Vacherot's 44.33%. How significant is this edge? Historical stats emphasize the high correlation between this metric and match outcomes.
When we switch gears to return game stats, Jong maintains his slight upper hand, winning 45.06% of his opponent's second serve points, compared to Vacherot's 44.84%. The first serve return game tells a different tale, with Vacherot edging out slightly by claiming 26.42% of points over Jong’s 25.5%. This figure might tilt the scales when determining the favorite in this head-to-head duel.
No tennis match is complete without the pressure points— those crucial breakpoints. Jong has excelled in this department, saving 56.4% in recent matches, a decent cushion over Vacherot, who has rescued 53.51% of these pressure situations. With Jong winning 63.89% of his matches over the last year compared to Vacherot’s 61.36%, does this contribute to painting a clearer picture of the favorite?
The surface preferences of each player further add nuance to predictions. Both Jong and Vacherot boast their highest win percentages on hard courts. Jong achieves 67%, while Vacherot excels with 72%. However, their performances on grass are less impressive, with Jong at 36% and Vacherot facing a complete absence of victories.
Then there’s the player's level and experience. Jong’s recent participation largely revolves around Challenger and ITF tournaments, winning 64.58% of those matches. In contrast, Vacherot in the same circuit has an impressive 66.67% win rate, but these should be weighed against the level of competition.
It's also revealing to consider past direct encounters. Vacherot emerged triumphant in their only previous clash at the San Marino Challenger in 2022. Can Jong bridge the gap in their latest meeting after learning from past setbacks? Consider also the match dynamics if they reach a deciding set, with Jong having won 52% of these scenarios over the last year, overshadowed by Vacherot's highly confident 60%.
Perhaps the most telling matchup is in break-point conversion. Jong, converting 32.59% of chances, again shows a slender lead over Vacherot's 30.26%. As both look to seize every opportunity, who will emerge victorious? Considering the balance of statistics, even though slight, Jong’s sharper edge in key statistical areas suggests he's poised to tip the scales and claim victory. The court awaits to see if the numbers hold true or if Vacherot's fighting spirit will write a different script.
Jong vs Vacherot Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Jannik Sinner
Player
Jesper De Jong
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
48%
(
28 of
58)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Jesper De Jong
Player
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Jesper De Jong
Player
Alexander Shevchenko
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
49%
(
32 of
65)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Jesper De Jong
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Jesper De Jong
Player
Harold Mayot
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Jesper De Jong
74%
(
59 of
80)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
34 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Jesper De Jong
Player
Joao Fonseca
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Tristan Boyer
Player
Jesper De Jong
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
92)
7
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
82%
(
49 of
60)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
47 of
62)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
30%
(
28 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
26 of
92)
92
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
F |
![]() ![]()
Francesco Maestrelli
Player
Valentin Vacherot
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Mark Lajal
73%
(
55 of
75)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
88)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
84
Total Points Won
79
|
1-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Elias Ymer
57%
(
48 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
57 of
97)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
44 of
97)
98
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Alexey Vatutin
51%
(
31 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
47 of
76)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Clement Chidekh
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve %
57%
(
21 of
37)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
59
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Borna Gojo
Player
Valentin Vacherot
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Jaume Antoni Munar Clar
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
83)
86
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Arthur Gea
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
49%
(
37 of
75)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
63% (270/162) | Win/Loss | 65% (256/137) |
60% (595/391) | Sets Win/Loss | 62% (560/349) |
55% (5105/4252) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (4726/3924) |
67% (87/43) | Hard Win/Loss | 72% (116/46) |
64% (158/88) | Clay Win/Loss | 64% (134/76) |
47% (21/24) | Indoor Hard W/L | 30% (6/14) |
36% (4/7) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
0.38 | Aces Per Game | 0.33 |
1734 | Aces Total | 1411 |
0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
1093 | Total Double Faults | 664 |
1:39:21 | Average Match Time | 1:29:57 |
377.18 | Average Opponent Rank | 394.73 |
60% (17488/29060) | 1st Serve % | 66% (15374/23198) |
70% (12259/17488) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (10620/15374) |
51% (5892/11572) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (4168/7824) |
43% (1340/3128) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1025/2396) |
41% (12169/29336) | Return Points Win % | 40% (9442/23440) |
61% (20/13) | Slam W/L | 63% (5/3) |
50% (4/4) | Masters W/L | 30% (3/7) |
0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 57% (4/3) |
48% (15/16) | Main Tour W/L | 45% (5/6) |
61% (126/82) | Challenger W/L | 65% (80/43) |
69% (105/47) | Futures W/L | 68% (159/75) |
62% (258/413) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 65% (252/387) |
57% (4/7) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
50% (74/147) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (64/118) |
52% (65/125) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (74/124) |
89% (265/235) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (248/222) |
11% (265/30) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (248/26) |
20% (167/33) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (145/34) |