search

Jesper De Jong vs Nerman Fatic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Jong vs Fatic analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Jesper De Jong vs Nerman Fatic Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Jong 1 - 0 Fatic

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jong has won 49.47% of points on their second serve, while Fatic has won 48.76%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jong, in recent form, has won 50.57% of their opponent's second serve points, while Fatic has won 44.77%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.89% and 31.99% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Jong has saved 60.78% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fatic has saved 60.51% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Jong has won 59.65% of matches played (W/L 34/ 23), with Fatic winning 50.77% (W/L 33/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Jong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 80/ 37), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 3/ 6). Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 283/ 195), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
  • Player level: In the last year, Jong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 21/ 14), where as Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 47.62% of matches (W/L 20/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jong winning 1 times and Fatic being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Jong winning 2 and Fatic winning 1. The last match between Jong and Fatic was at the Rome Challenger, 22-04-2024, First, Clay with Jesper De Jong getting the victory 3-6 7-6(6) 4-1 ret..
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:26:56.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Jong and Fatic have played a deciding set 0 times, with Jong winning 0 times and Fatic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Jong winning 1, and Fatic 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jong has played against opponents with an average rank of 324.04 while Fatic has played against players with an average rank of 274.25.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jong has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fatic has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Jong has converted 47.18% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fatic has converted 38.64% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
bet365
Jesper De Jong

6

Total

0

Mast

2

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

4

Minor

147

Rank

135

High

24

Age

R

Plays

1

Total

0

0

Hard

0

1

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

198

Rank

191

High

29

Age

R

Plays

Nerman Fatic

8

Total

0

Mast

2

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

6

Minor

1

Total

0

0

Hard

0

1

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

W L L W W W W L W L

Form

L L L W W W L W L L

62% (226-137)

Career Total W/L

57% (343-258)

59% (22-15)

YTD W/L

40% (10-15)

$430,415

Career Prize Money

$73,995

0

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

The Best Odds For Jesper De Jong vs Nerman Fatic For Any Market:

We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:

Jong VS Fatic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats Jesper De Jong Nerman Fatic
All H2H Matches 1 0
Sets Won 2 1
Games Won 14 13
Aces (Total) 3 5
DFs (Total) 2 1
Avg Match Time 2:26:56 2:26:56
1st Serve % 57% (49/86) 70% (58/83)
1st Serve Win% 78% (38/49) 71% (41/58)
2nd Serve Win% 51% (19/37) 56% (14/25)
BPs Won% (Total) 20% (1/5) 67% (2/3)
Return Points W% 34% (28/83) 34% (29/86)
Best of 3 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets W% 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
TBs Win% (Total) 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
Deciding Set Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 0% (0/0) 0% (1/0)
1st set W, L 0% (0/0) 100% (1/1)
1st set L, W 100% (1/1) 0% (0/0)

Jong VS Fatic H2h Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
3-6 7-6(6) 4-1 ret.
cross
Jesper De Jong
Player
Nerman Fatic
57% ( 49 of 86)
1st Serve %
70% ( 58 of 83)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
78% ( 38 of 49)
1st Serve Won
71% ( 41 of 58)
51% ( 19 of 37)
2nd Serve Won
56% ( 14 of 25)
20% ( 1 of 5)
Break Points Won
67% ( 2 of 3)
34% ( 29 of 86)
Rtn Points Won
34% ( 28 of 83)
85
Total Points Won
84

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Jesper De Jong Nerman Fatic
YTD W/L 59% (22/15) 40% (10/15)
Sets Win/Loss 56% (51/40) 44% (25/32)
Games Win/Loss 53% (454/407) 47% (257/285)
Hard Win/Loss 70% (7/3) 50% (3/3)
Clay Win/Loss 60% (15/10) 33% (6/12)
Indoor Hard W/L 0% (0/2) 100% (1/0)
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces pg 0.44 0.38
Aces Total 186 100
DFs per game 0.24 0.19
DFs Total 101 50
Avg Match Time 1:55:27 1:38:36
Avg Opp Rank 308.62 302.16
1st Serve % 59% (1632/2770) 65% (1041/1605)
1st Serve W% 71% (1157/1632) 68% (709/1041)
2nd Serve W% 49% (563/1138) 49% (275/564)
BPs Won% Total 47% (117/248) 39% (51/132)
Return Pts W% 40% (1075/2700) 36% (589/1620)
Slam W/L 80% (8/2) 33% (1/2)
Masters W/L 50% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 100% (1/0)
Main Tour W/L 0% (0/2) 50% (1/1)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 57% (13/10) 39% (7/11)
Futures W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 58% (18/31) 39% (9/23)
Best of 5 Sets W% 60% (3/5) 0% (0/1)
TBs Win% (Total) 55% (6/11) 44% (4/9)
Deciding Set W% 50% (5/10) 29% (2/7)
1st set W, W 95% (20/19) 75% (12/9)
1st set W, L 5% (20/1) 25% (12/3)
1st set L, W 18% (17/3) 8% (13/1)

Jesper De Jong Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
R2
cross
Laslo Djere
Player
Jesper De Jong
72% ( 46 of 64)
1st Serve %
56% ( 35 of 62)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
70% ( 32 of 46)
1st Serve Won
69% ( 24 of 35)
50% ( 9 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 11 of 27)
80% ( 4 of 5)
Break Points Won
67% ( 2 of 3)
36% ( 23 of 64)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 27 of 62)
68
Total Points Won
58
L
6-4 7-5 H2H
R1
cross
Jesper De Jong
Player
Riccardo Bonadio
70% ( 48 of 69)
1st Serve %
75% ( 69 of 92)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
81% ( 39 of 48)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 42 of 69)
38% ( 8 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
52% ( 12 of 23)
30% ( 3 of 10)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
32% ( 22 of 69)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 38 of 92)
85
Total Points Won
76
W
7-5 7-5 H2H
R2
cross
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Jesper De Jong
70% ( 78 of 112)
1st Serve %
58% ( 72 of 124)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
64% ( 50 of 78)
1st Serve Won
56% ( 40 of 72)
50% ( 17 of 34)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 23 of 52)
44% ( 8 of 18)
Break Points Won
42% ( 5 of 12)
40% ( 45 of 112)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 61 of 124)
128
Total Points Won
108
L
6-3 6-4 2-6 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Jesper De Jong
Player
Jack Draper
50% ( 77 of 154)
1st Serve %
50% ( 75 of 149)
11
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
9
74% ( 57 of 77)
1st Serve Won
68% ( 51 of 75)
52% ( 40 of 77)
2nd Serve Won
51% ( 38 of 74)
90% ( 9 of 10)
Break Points Won
64% ( 7 of 11)
37% ( 57 of 154)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 60 of 149)
157
Total Points Won
146
W
7-5 6-4 6-7(3) 3-6 6-3 H2H
QF
cross
Jesper De Jong
Player
Jeff Wolf
52% ( 28 of 54)
1st Serve %
41% ( 18 of 44)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
82% ( 23 of 28)
1st Serve Won
72% ( 13 of 18)
54% ( 14 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
31% ( 8 of 26)
44% ( 4 of 9)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
31% ( 17 of 54)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 23 of 44)
60
Total Points Won
38
W
6-1 6-2 H2H
Q2
cross
Jesper De Jong
Player
Dennis Novak
63% ( 40 of 63)
1st Serve %
62% ( 32 of 52)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
70% ( 28 of 40)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 20 of 32)
52% ( 12 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
40% ( 8 of 20)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
13% ( 1 of 8)
37% ( 23 of 63)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 24 of 52)
64
Total Points Won
51
W
6-3 6-3 H2H
Q1
cross
Jesper De Jong
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
54% ( 45 of 84)
1st Serve %
59% ( 60 of 101)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
69% ( 31 of 45)
1st Serve Won
62% ( 37 of 60)
51% ( 20 of 39)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 17 of 41)
44% ( 4 of 9)
Break Points Won
60% ( 3 of 5)
39% ( 33 of 84)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 47 of 101)
98
Total Points Won
87
W
7-5 7-6(6) H2H
R1
cross
Valentin Royer
Player
Jesper De Jong
55% ( 56 of 102)
1st Serve %
49% ( 45 of 92)
8
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
3
79% ( 44 of 56)
1st Serve Won
80% ( 36 of 45)
59% ( 27 of 46)
2nd Serve Won
57% ( 27 of 47)
40% ( 2 of 5)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
30% ( 31 of 102)
Rtn Points Won
32% ( 29 of 92)
100
Total Points Won
94
L
6-3 5-7 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Jesper De Jong
49% ( 42 of 85)
1st Serve %
60% ( 59 of 98)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
69% ( 29 of 42)
1st Serve Won
71% ( 42 of 59)
70% ( 30 of 43)
2nd Serve Won
49% ( 19 of 39)
38% ( 3 of 8)
Break Points Won
67% ( 2 of 3)
31% ( 26 of 85)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 37 of 98)
96
Total Points Won
87
L
6-4 4-6 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Jesper De Jong
Player
Jurij Rodionov
54% ( 58 of 107)
1st Serve %
45% ( 40 of 89)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
60% ( 35 of 58)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 25 of 40)
51% ( 25 of 49)
2nd Serve Won
51% ( 25 of 49)
33% ( 4 of 12)
Break Points Won
33% ( 4 of 12)
44% ( 47 of 107)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 39 of 89)
99
Total Points Won
97
W
6-3 2-6 6-4 H2H

Nerman Fatic Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
R1
cross
Sumit Nagal
Player
Nerman Fatic
81% ( 46 of 57)
1st Serve %
71% ( 60 of 84)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
76% ( 35 of 46)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 36 of 60)
73% ( 8 of 11)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 9 of 24)
33% ( 3 of 9)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
25% ( 14 of 57)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 39 of 84)
82
Total Points Won
59
L
7-6(1) 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Nerman Fatic
77% ( 72 of 93)
1st Serve %
61% ( 48 of 79)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
69% ( 50 of 72)
1st Serve Won
77% ( 37 of 48)
57% ( 12 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 12 of 31)
38% ( 3 of 8)
Break Points Won
13% ( 1 of 8)
33% ( 31 of 93)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 30 of 79)
92
Total Points Won
80
L
6-2 4-6 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Nerman Fatic
Player
Adrian Andreev
62% ( 13 of 21)
1st Serve %
38% ( 8 of 21)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
77% ( 10 of 13)
1st Serve Won
50% ( 4 of 8)
75% ( 6 of 8)
2nd Serve Won
31% ( 4 of 13)
75% ( 3 of 4)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
24% ( 5 of 21)
Rtn Points Won
62% ( 13 of 21)
29
Total Points Won
13
W
6-1 ret. H2H
SF
cross
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Nerman Fatic
63% ( 60 of 95)
1st Serve %
71% ( 63 of 89)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
68% ( 41 of 60)
1st Serve Won
56% ( 35 of 63)
37% ( 13 of 35)
2nd Serve Won
46% ( 12 of 26)
57% ( 8 of 14)
Break Points Won
50% ( 7 of 14)
43% ( 41 of 95)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 42 of 89)
96
Total Points Won
88
L
6-3 4-6 7-5 H2H
QF
cross
Nerman Fatic
Player
Adrian Andreev
68% ( 50 of 74)
1st Serve %
68% ( 32 of 47)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
62% ( 31 of 50)
1st Serve Won
59% ( 19 of 32)
54% ( 13 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
47% ( 7 of 15)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
17% ( 2 of 12)
41% ( 30 of 74)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 21 of 47)
65
Total Points Won
56
W
6-4 6-3 H2H
R2
cross
Nerman Fatic
Player
Aziz Dougaz
78% ( 47 of 60)
1st Serve %
68% ( 36 of 53)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
77% ( 36 of 47)
1st Serve Won
72% ( 26 of 36)
62% ( 8 of 13)
2nd Serve Won
47% ( 8 of 17)
67% ( 2 of 3)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
27% ( 16 of 60)
Rtn Points Won
36% ( 19 of 53)
63
Total Points Won
50
W
6-2 7-6(1) H2H
R1
cross
Nerman Fatic
Player
Timofey Skatov
70% ( 33 of 47)
1st Serve %
54% ( 29 of 54)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
70% ( 23 of 33)
1st Serve Won
41% ( 12 of 29)
71% ( 10 of 14)
2nd Serve Won
60% ( 15 of 25)
40% ( 4 of 10)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
30% ( 14 of 47)
Rtn Points Won
50% ( 27 of 54)
60
Total Points Won
41
W
6-4 6-0 H2H
Q1
cross
Felipe Meligeni Alves
Player
Nerman Fatic
81% ( 47 of 58)
1st Serve %
70% ( 39 of 56)
3
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
74% ( 35 of 47)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 26 of 39)
82% ( 9 of 11)
2nd Serve Won
53% ( 9 of 17)
33% ( 2 of 6)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
24% ( 14 of 58)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 21 of 56)
65
Total Points Won
49
L
6-3 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Nerman Fatic
53% ( 39 of 74)
1st Serve %
65% ( 56 of 86)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
6
82% ( 32 of 39)
1st Serve Won
73% ( 41 of 56)
63% ( 22 of 35)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 15 of 30)
17% ( 1 of 6)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
27% ( 20 of 74)
Rtn Points Won
35% ( 30 of 86)
84
Total Points Won
76
L
7-6(5) 7-5 H2H
R1
cross
Jesper De Jong
Player
Nerman Fatic
57% ( 49 of 86)
1st Serve %
70% ( 58 of 83)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
78% ( 38 of 49)
1st Serve Won
71% ( 41 of 58)
51% ( 19 of 37)
2nd Serve Won
56% ( 14 of 25)
20% ( 1 of 5)
Break Points Won
67% ( 2 of 3)
34% ( 29 of 86)
Rtn Points Won
34% ( 28 of 83)
85
Total Points Won
84
L
3-6 7-6(6) 4-1 ret. H2H

Jong Vs Fatic Prediction H2H Images To Share

More tennis photos of Jong are available here and Fatic photos here.


Potential H2H Matches This Week For Jesper De Jong

Sassuolo Challenger

Buse vs Jong H2H Pick , could play in The Second round

Vesely vs Jong H2H Pick , could play in The Second round

Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions