Z. Bergs
To Win
J. Fonseca
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L L W L L LForm
W L W L L L W W L LThey have played 2 sets in total, with Jong winning 2 and Fonseca winning 0. The last match between Jong and Fonseca was at the Estoril Challenger, 30-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Jesper De Jong getting the victory 6-2 7-5.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Jesper De Jong | 1 |
Joao Fonseca | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Estoril Challenger(30-04-2025)
Jong | Stats | Fonseca |
---|---|---|
49% (19-20) | YTD Win/Loss | 71% (25-10) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
104 | Ranking | 57 |
87 | Highest Rank | 57 |
25 | Age | 18 |
R | Plays | - |
7 | Titles | 5 |
62% (272-167) | Career Total W/L | 64% (78-44) |
$729,035 | Career Prize Money | $596,435 |
0 | YTD Titles | 3 |
1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
23 Jun 2025 / First
Mallorca Championships - Mallorca atp
22 Jun 2025 / First
Wimbledon - London atp
23 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 7-5 |
![]() ![]()
Jesper De Jong
Player
Joao Fonseca
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
13 | Games Won | 7 |
2 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
1 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
1:16:14 | Average Match Time | 1:16:14 |
56% (28/50) | 1st Serve % | 66% (37/56) |
86% (24/28) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (23/37) |
59% (13/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (9/19) |
80% (4/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
43% (24/56) | Return Points Win % | 26% (13/50) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Analyzing the recent performance on second serves, Jong has secured 46.58% of points, whereas Fonseca slightly edges ahead with 47.52%. These figures are significant indicators in predicting match outcomes. Furthermore, when it comes to breaking an opponent's serve, Jong's success in converting breakpoints stands at 28.33%, compared to Fonseca's 31.01%. This conversion rate provides valuable insights for in-game betting strategies.
In return games, Jong has been dominant with a 43.22% success rate in capturing opponent’s second serve points, while Fonseca follows closely at 41.59%. A similar trend is seen with first serve returns; Jong has won 23.74% of these points, with Fonseca performing slightly better at 25.45%. These statistics are crucial for determining who might be favored in head-to-head matchups.
Under pressure, Fonseca has displayed remarkable resilience by saving 59.06% of breakpoints, whereas Jong has maintained a respectable rate of 54.59%. In terms of overall performance over the past year, Jong has achieved a win rate of 62.5% from a record of 45 wins and 27 losses. Fonseca, however, shows a superior performance with a 71.88% win ratio and a record of 46 wins to 18 losses.
When examining surface preferences, both players exhibit their best results on Hard courts. Jong owns a win rate of 67% (87 wins, 43 losses), while Fonseca excels with a 76% success rate (26 wins, 8 losses). Their grass court records are less impressive; Jong at 36% (4 wins, 7 losses) and Fonseca at 33% (2 wins, 4 losses).
Considering the level at which each player has competed, Jong has mainly participated in Challengers and ITF tournaments with matches offering more than $10,000, boasting a 64.29% win rate. Fonseca has mirrored that experience but has achieved a higher winning percentage of 75%. It's important to note that the quality of opponents Jong has faced is slightly lower, with an average ranking of 218.04, compared to Fonseca's average opponent ranking of 114.25.
When matches extend to a deciding set, Fonseca holds a slight advantage, having won 55% of these matches, while Jong reflects a 52% win rate. Past player performances and current form during this event should heavily influence our predictions. Given these comprehensive statistics, Fonseca appears slightly favored to win the upcoming match.
Jong vs Fonseca Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Bernard Tomic
Player
Jesper De Jong
56%
(
50 of
89)
1st Serve %
58%
(
59 of
102)
6
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
6
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
51 of
59)
62%
(
24 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
27 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
34 of
102)
96
Total Points Won
95
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Tomas Machac
Player
Jesper De Jong
59%
(
55 of
93)
1st Serve %
55%
(
49 of
89)
12
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
33 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Laslo Djere
Player
Jesper De Jong
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Jesper De Jong
Player
Max Schoenhaus
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
59%
(
70 of
119)
14
Aces
14
4
Double Faults
8
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
49 of
70)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
14%
(
3 of
21)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
28 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
48 of
119)
108
Total Points Won
99
|
7-5 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Reilly Opelka
Player
Jesper De Jong
59%
(
63 of
107)
1st Serve %
59%
(
71 of
120)
19
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
6
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
52 of
71)
64%
(
28 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
29%
(
31 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
43 of
120)
119
Total Points Won
108
|
6-7(5) 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Alexander Zverev
Player
Jesper De Jong
77%
(
78 of
101)
1st Serve %
49%
(
60 of
122)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
33%
(
33 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
59 of
122)
127
Total Points Won
96
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Jesper De Jong
Player
Francesco Passaro
65%
(
96 of
147)
1st Serve %
69%
(
122 of
178)
9
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
80%
(
77 of
96)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
80 of
122)
51%
(
26 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
30%
(
44 of
147)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
73 of
178)
176
Total Points Won
149
|
3-6 6-7(7) 6-4 7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Jannik Sinner
Player
Jesper De Jong
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
48%
(
28 of
58)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Joao Fonseca
60%
(
83 of
138)
1st Serve %
68%
(
82 of
120)
11
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
59 of
83)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
64 of
82)
62%
(
34 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
33%
(
45 of
138)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
34 of
120)
127
Total Points Won
131
|
5-7 7-6(3) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Jack Draper
Player
Joao Fonseca
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
70%
(
59 of
84)
8
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
0
93%
(
37 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
14 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
84)
92
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Joao Fonseca
Player
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
65%
(
70 of
108)
1st Serve %
51%
(
65 of
127)
9
Aces
12
8
Double Faults
10
77%
(
54 of
70)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
44 of
65)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
36%
(
39 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
52 of
127)
121
Total Points Won
114
|
7-6(4) 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Joao Fonseca
Player
Hubert Hurkacz
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
9
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
0
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
17 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
90
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Joao Fonseca
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
18 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Jesper De Jong
Player
Joao Fonseca
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Tommy Paul
Player
Joao Fonseca
68%
(
69 of
102)
1st Serve %
72%
(
64 of
89)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
47 of
64)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
34%
(
35 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
89)
97
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(7) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Joao Fonseca
Player
Elmer Moller
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
62% (272/167) | Win/Loss | 64% (78/44) |
60% (604/405) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (185/116) |
54% (5209/4374) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (1512/1332) |
67% (87/43) | Hard Win/Loss | 76% (26/8) |
64% (159/89) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (37/25) |
47% (21/24) | Indoor Hard W/L | 68% (13/6) |
31% (5/11) | Grass Win/Loss | 29% (2/5) |
0.38 | Aces Per Game | 0.44 |
1789 | Aces Total | 615 |
0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
1124 | Total Double Faults | 261 |
1:40:5 | Average Match Time | 1:43:14 |
376.84 | Average Opponent Rank | 208.51 |
60% (17909/29786) | 1st Serve % | 64% (5635/8815) |
70% (12564/17909) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (3955/5635) |
51% (6040/11877) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (1692/3180) |
42% (1357/3194) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (365/933) |
41% (12430/30075) | Return Points Win % | 39% (3582/9184) |
60% (21/14) | Slam W/L | 67% (8/4) |
50% (4/4) | Masters W/L | 50% (5/5) |
0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 50% (2/2) |
44% (16/20) | Main Tour W/L | 64% (14/8) |
61% (126/82) | Challenger W/L | 66% (38/20) |
69% (105/47) | Futures W/L | 69% (11/5) |
62% (259/418) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (70/112) |
56% (5/9) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 80% (8/10) |
50% (76/151) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (32/54) |
52% (67/130) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (22/42) |
88% (269/236) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (74/65) |
12% (269/33) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (74/9) |
20% (170/34) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (48/13) |