J. Sinner
To Win
J. D. Jong
To Win
Jesper De Jong vs Jack Draper Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L W L W L W W
Form
W L W W W W W L W WH2H: Jong 1 - 1 Draper
They have played 8 sets in total, with Jong winning 4 and Draper winning 4. The last match between Jong and Draper was at the French Open - Paris, 26-05-2024, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Jesper De Jong getting the victory 7-5 6-4 6-7(3) 3-6 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jesper De Jong | 1 |
| Jack Draper | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: French Open - Paris(26-05-2024)
7
5
6
4
6
7
3
6
6
3
| Jong | Stats | Draper |
|---|---|---|
| 55% (17-14) | YTD Win/Loss | 81% (21-5) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 93 | Ranking | 5 |
| 93 | Highest Rank | 5 |
| 24 | Age | 23 |
| R | Plays | L |
| 7 | Titles | 15 |
| 63% (270-161) | Career Total W/L | 69% (251-111) |
| $601,955 | Career Prize Money | $5,286,820 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
12 May 2025 / Third
ODDS
Upcoming Match
13 May 2025 / Fourth
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Draper VS Moutet PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome atp
13 May 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Gauff VS Raducanu PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome wta
12 May 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-4 6-7(3) 3-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Jesper De Jong
Player
Jack Draper
50%
(
77 of
154)
1st Serve %
50%
(
75 of
149)
11
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
9
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
51 of
75)
52%
(
40 of
77)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
90%
(
9 of
10)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
37%
(
57 of
154)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
60 of
149)
157
Total Points Won
146
|
||||
| 4-6 6-4 7-6(4) |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Jesper De Jong
65%
(
70 of
108)
1st Serve %
66%
(
73 of
111)
11
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
4
81%
(
57 of
70)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
47 of
73)
21%
(
8 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
40%
(
43 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
111)
112
Total Points Won
107
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 44 | Games Won | 42 |
| 20 | Aces (Total) | 18 |
| 10 | Total Double Faults | 15 |
| 3:18:15 | Average Match Time | 3:18:15 |
| 57% (150/265) | 1st Serve % | 56% (145/257) |
| 69% (104/150) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (108/145) |
| 50% (57/115) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (46/112) |
| 64% (14/22) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 60% (12/20) |
| 40% (103/257) | Return Points Win % | 39% (104/265) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (2/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jesper De Jong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Alexander Shevchenko
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
49%
(
32 of
65)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Jesper De Jong
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Harold Mayot
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Jesper De Jong
74%
(
59 of
80)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
34 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Joao Fonseca
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tristan Boyer
Player
Jesper De Jong
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
92)
7
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
82%
(
49 of
60)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
47 of
62)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
30%
(
28 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
26 of
92)
92
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrey Rublev
Player
Jesper De Jong
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
77%
(
48 of
62)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Lloyd Harris
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
view more
Jack Draper Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Vit Kopriva
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Luciano Darderi
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Jack Draper
59%
(
57 of
96)
1st Serve %
64%
(
65 of
102)
9
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
3
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
47 of
65)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
35 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
99
Total Points Won
99
|
7-5 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Lorenzo Musetti
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve %
73%
(
53 of
73)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
57)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Tommy Paul
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Matteo Berrettini
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
46
Total Points Won
38
|
7-6(2) ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Tallon Griekspoor
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve %
76%
(
38 of
50)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
17 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
Jack Draper
63%
(
74 of
118)
1st Serve %
48%
(
47 of
98)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
10
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
59%
(
26 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
41%
(
48 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
98)
113
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 6-7(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Marcos Giron
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
46%
(
21 of
46)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (270/161) | Win/Loss | 69% (251/111) |
| 60% (595/389) | Sets Win/Loss | 66% (568/289) |
| 55% (5099/4240) | Games Win/Loss | 56% (4529/3519) |
| 67% (87/43) | Hard Win/Loss | 72% (120/47) |
| 64% (158/87) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (32/21) |
| 47% (21/24) | Indoor Hard W/L | 73% (82/30) |
| 36% (4/7) | Grass Win/Loss | 57% (17/13) |
| 0.38 | Aces Per Game | 0.61 |
| 1733 | Aces Total | 2384 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 1092 | Total Double Faults | 1114 |
| 1:39:22 | Average Match Time | 1:38:34 |
| 377.77 | Average Opponent Rank | 315.68 |
| 60% (17460/29002) | 1st Serve % | 60% (14168/23752) |
| 70% (12244/17460) | 1st Serve Win % | 76% (10724/14168) |
| 51% (5881/11542) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (4859/9583) |
| 43% (1338/3124) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1115/2555) |
| 41% (12151/29284) | Return Points Win % | 40% (9915/24693) |
| 61% (20/13) | Slam W/L | 55% (16/13) |
| 57% (4/3) | Masters W/L | 65% (34/18) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 25% (1/3) |
| 48% (15/16) | Main Tour W/L | 68% (52/25) |
| 61% (126/82) | Challenger W/L | 67% (56/28) |
| 69% (105/47) | Futures W/L | 80% (91/23) |
| 63% (258/412) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 71% (226/317) |
| 57% (4/7) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 61% (19/31) |
| 50% (74/147) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (67/117) |
| 52% (65/125) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (59/103) |
| 89% (265/235) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (241/217) |
| 11% (265/30) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (241/21) |
| 20% (166/33) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 28% (121/34) |
Jong vs. Draper Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
