Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jesper De Jong vs Andrey Chepelev Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Jong vs Chepelev analysis and find out who is favored!
Jesper De Jong vs Andrey Chepelev Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jong has won 49.04% of points on his second serve, while Chepelev has won 43.18%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jong, in recent form, has won 52.83% of his opponent's second serve points, while Chepelev has won 54.33%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.05% and 31.02% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jong has saved 65.36% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chepelev has saved 56.3% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jong has won 60.66% of matches played (W/L 37/ 24), with Chepelev winning 64.71% (W/L 55/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 80/ 38), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 3/ 6). Chepelev has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 382/ 243), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 29% (W/L 2/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Jong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.41% of matches (W/L 26/ 15), where as Chepelev has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65% of matches (W/L 52/ 28). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jong winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Jong winning 2 and Chepelev winning 0. The last match between Jong and Chepelev was at the Piracicaba Challenger, 17-01-2023, First, Clay with Jesper De Jong getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:30:28.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Jong and Chepelev have played a deciding set 0 times, with Jong winning 0 times and Chepelev 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Jong winning 0, and Chepelev 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jong has played against opponents with an average rank of 318.33 while Chepelev has played against players with an average rank of 188.74.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jong has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chepelev has won 68% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jong has converted 48.09% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chepelev has converted 49.35% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Jong 1 - 0 Chepelev
158
Rank
135
High
23
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
509
Rank
339
High
25
Age
L
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
62% (216-131)
Career Total W/L
60% (390-256)
57% (12-9)
YTD W/L
38% (3-5)
$308,595
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jesper De Jong | Andrey Chepelev |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:30:28 | 1:30:28 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (39/58) | 73% (49/67) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (29/39) | 55% (27/49) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (10/19) | 39% (7/18) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 36% (4/11) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (33/67) | 33% (19/58) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats 
Jesper De Jong
Player
Andrey Chepelev
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jesper De Jong | Andrey Chepelev |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (12/9) | 38% (3/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (27/22) | 41% (7/10) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (237/210) | 48% (68/74) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 70% (7/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 56% (5/4) | 38% (3/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.55 | 0.03 |
| Aces Total | 119 | 2 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0.47 |
| DFs Total | 58 | 33 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:13 | 1:28:15 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 308.57 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (885/1460) | 65% (293/454) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (626/885) | 61% (179/293) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (282/575) | 43% (69/161) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (63/131) | 56% (24/43) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (564/1405) | 42% (181/428) |
| Slam W/L | 80% (4/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 57% (8/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 38% (3/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 56% (10/18) | 38% (3/8) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 91% (11/10) | 75% (4/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 9% (11/1) | 25% (4/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 0% (4/0) |
Jesper De Jong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Jesper De Jong
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
4
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Gauthier Onclin
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lorenzo Giustino
Player
Jesper De Jong
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
79)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
5
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
47%
(
38 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
43 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Nikolas Sanchez-Izquierdo
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
44%
(
25 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Oleksii Krutykh
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
15%
(
6 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pedro Martinez Portero
Player
Jesper De Jong
74%
(
76 of
103)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
0
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
66%
(
50 of
76)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
41 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
90
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(4) 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Andrea Pellegrino
47%
(
7 of
15)
1st Serve %
57%
(
8 of
14)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
6 of
7)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
21
Total Points Won
8
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Jan Choinski
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Player
Jesper De Jong
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Jesper De Jong
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Andrey Chepelev Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jiri Barnat
Player
Andrey Chepelev
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
38%
(
19 of
50)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
11
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Markus Molder
Player
Andrey Chepelev
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
78)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
21 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
David Fix
Player
Andrey Chepelev
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
80)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
82
Total Points Won
74
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrey Chepelev
Player
Timofei Derepasko
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Andrey Chepelev
49%
(
34 of
70)
1st Serve %
79%
(
50 of
63)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrey Chepelev
Player
Samuil Konov
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Giovanni Calvano
Player
Andrey Chepelev
81%
(
13 of
16)
1st Serve %
61%
(
14 of
23)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
92%
(
12 of
13)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
33%
(
1 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
78%
(
18 of
23)
31
Total Points Won
8
|
6-0 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrey Chepelev
Player
Ghouse Ali Faisal
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
0
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
3
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julio Cesar Porras
Player
Andrey Chepelev
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
24%
(
15 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
76
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrey Chepelev
Player
Joris Moret
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jong Vs Chepelev Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
