Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jesper DE Jong vs Robert Galloway Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Jong vs Galloway analysis and find out who is favored!
Jesper DE Jong vs Robert Galloway Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jong has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Galloway has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jong, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Galloway has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jong has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Galloway has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jong has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Galloway winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jong has played against opponents with an average rank of while Galloway has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jong has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Galloway has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jong has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Galloway has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Jong 0 - 0 Galloway
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
31
Age
R
Plays
Form
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Jesper DE Jong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Jesper De Jong
Player
Nerman Fatic
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 7-6(6) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Jesper De Jong
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
4
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Gauthier Onclin
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lorenzo Giustino
Player
Jesper De Jong
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
79)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
5
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
47%
(
38 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
43 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Nikolas Sanchez-Izquierdo
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
44%
(
25 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Oleksii Krutykh
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
15%
(
6 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pedro Martinez Portero
Player
Jesper De Jong
74%
(
76 of
103)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
0
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
66%
(
50 of
76)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
41 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
90
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(4) 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Andrea Pellegrino
47%
(
7 of
15)
1st Serve %
57%
(
8 of
14)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
6 of
7)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
21
Total Points Won
8
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Jan Choinski
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Player
Jesper De Jong
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Robert Galloway Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Fery
Player
Robert Galloway
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
6
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Karl Friberg
Player
Robert Galloway
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
82)
4
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
8
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
34 of
44)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
10%
(
1 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
16 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Robert Galloway
51%
(
36 of
71)
1st Serve %
50%
(
36 of
72)
4
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Robert Galloway
Player
Cheong-Eui Kim
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Borna Gojo
Player
Robert Galloway
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
9
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
5
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andrew Harris
Player
Robert Galloway
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mukund Sasikumar
Player
Robert Galloway
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
6
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aidan Mchugh
Player
Robert Galloway
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
40 of
73)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
1-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Georgii Kravchenko
Player
Robert Galloway
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve %
52%
(
44 of
85)
0
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
11
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
68
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Robert Galloway
Player
Ivan Nedelko
65%
(
60 of
92)
1st Serve %
57%
(
58 of
101)
10
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
44 of
58)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
32 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
101)
99
Total Points Won
94
|
2-6 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Jong Vs Galloway Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
