Jesper DE Jong vs Moritz Thiem Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Jong vs Thiem analysis and find out who is favored!
Jesper DE Jong vs Moritz Thiem Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jong has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Thiem has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jong, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Thiem has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jong has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Thiem has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jong has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Thiem winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jong has played against opponents with an average rank of while Thiem has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jong has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Thiem has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jong has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Thiem has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Jong 0 - 0 Thiem
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Jesper DE Jong Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Jesper De Jong
Player
Andrea Pellegrino
47%
(
7 of
15)
1st Serve %
57%
(
8 of
14)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
6 of
7)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
21
Total Points Won
8
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jesper De Jong
Player
Jan Choinski
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Player
Jesper De Jong
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Jesper De Jong
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jesper De Jong
Player
August Holmgren
60%
(
65 of
109)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
7
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
5
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
34 of
42)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
42%
(
46 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
25 of
75)
88
Total Points Won
96
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Milos Raonic
Player
Jesper De Jong
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
20
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
4
97%
(
36 of
37)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
37 of
44)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
15 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
25 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Jesper De Jong
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
77)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jannik Sinner
Player
Jesper De Jong
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
10 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jesper De Jong
Player
Pedro Cachin
67%
(
75 of
112)
1st Serve %
63%
(
66 of
105)
11
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
56 of
75)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
29%
(
33 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
105)
120
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jesper De Jong
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
59%
(
72 of
123)
1st Serve %
50%
(
58 of
116)
7
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
2
75%
(
54 of
72)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
48 of
58)
53%
(
27 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
34%
(
42 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
38 of
116)
119
Total Points Won
120
|
7-6(3) 3-6 7-6(7) | H2H |
view more
Moritz Thiem Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Mathias Bourgue
Player
Moritz Thiem
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
72
Total Points Won
43
|
3-6 6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
R1 | 7-6(6) 3-6 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
R1 | 7-5 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Patric Prinoth
Player
Moritz Thiem
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Luka Pavlovic
Player
Moritz Thiem
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
31 of
44)
8
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Moritz Thiem
Player
Alexandros Skorilas
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Kai Wehnelt
Player
Moritz Thiem
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve %
81%
(
42 of
52)
6
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
0
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Moritz Thiem
Player
Tomas Liska
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H |
view more