Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jerome Kym vs Michael Vrbensky Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kym vs Vrbensky analysis and find out who is favored!
Jerome Kym vs Michael Vrbensky Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kym has won 52.9% of points on his second serve, while Vrbensky has won 47.87%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kym, in recent form, has won 48.84% of his opponent's second serve points, while Vrbensky has won 52.03%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.85% and 33% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kym has saved 62.9% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vrbensky has saved 56.91% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kym has won 69.23% of matches played (W/L 27/ 12), with Vrbensky winning 63.1% (W/L 53/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kym has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 79% (W/L 23/ 6), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 12/ 10). Vrbensky has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 174/ 107), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 37/ 27).
- Player level: In the last year, Kym has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 18/ 6), where as Vrbensky has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 71.43% of matches (W/L 30/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Kym winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Kym winning 4 and Vrbensky winning 0. The last match between Kym and Vrbensky was at the Bratislava 1 Challenger, 12-06-2023, Q3, Clay with Jerome Kym getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:30:19.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kym and Vrbensky have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kym winning 0 times and Vrbensky 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Kym winning 1, and Vrbensky 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kym has played against opponents with an average rank of 218.38 while Vrbensky has played against players with an average rank of 309.99.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kym has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Vrbensky has won 64% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kym has converted 37.84% of breakpoint opportunities, and Vrbensky has converted 42.86% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kym 2 - 0 Vrbensky
500
Rank
348
High
21
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
2
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
317
Rank
282
High
24
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
65% (83-45)
Career Total W/L
61% (254-165)
73% (11-4)
YTD W/L
41% (7-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$3,200
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jerome Kym | Michael Vrbensky |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 25 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 16 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 11 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:30:19 | 1:30:19 |
| 1st Serve % | 77% (88/114) | 54% (81/149) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (65/88) | 64% (52/81) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 58% (15/26) | 44% (30/68) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (7/14) | 43% (3/7) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (67/149) | 30% (34/114) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Jerome Kym
Player
Michael Vrbensky
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
8
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
| 6-3 7-6(3) |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Michael Vrbensky
82%
(
50 of
61)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
81)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jerome Kym | Michael Vrbensky |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 73% (11/4) | 41% (7/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 71% (22/9) | 44% (18/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 58% (170/125) | 47% (175/195) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 86% (6/1) | 57% (4/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 75% (3/1) | 20% (1/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (2/2) | 40% (2/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.62 | 0.3 |
| Aces Total | 89 | 55 |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.34 |
| DFs Total | 27 | 61 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:35:53 | 1:47:3 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 178.6 | 285.94 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (592/902) | 59% (693/1170) |
| 1st Serve W% | 74% (436/592) | 66% (457/693) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (164/310) | 46% (220/477) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (42/111) | 40% (51/126) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (383/943) | 41% (497/1224) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 33% (3/6) |
| Futures W/L | 79% (11/3) | 50% (4/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 79% (11/14) | 44% (7/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 100% (3/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (2/2) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (10/10) | 88% (8/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (10/0) | 13% (8/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (5/1) | 0% (9/0) |
Jerome Kym Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Cian Maguire
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aziz Dougaz
Player
Jerome Kym
62%
(
55 of
89)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
88
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Johan Nikles
69%
(
72 of
104)
1st Serve %
73%
(
67 of
92)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
42%
(
44 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
92)
108
Total Points Won
88
|
6-7(6) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Erik Tkalenko
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Giovanni Oradini
Player
Jerome Kym
53%
(
17 of
32)
1st Serve %
67%
(
20 of
30)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
12 of
17)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
38%
(
12 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
31
Total Points Won
31
|
5-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Florian Broska
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
54
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Andrea Guerrieri
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
10
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Jerome Kym
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Enzo Wallart
Player
Jerome Kym
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Ben Weintraub
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
8
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Michael Vrbensky Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jacopo Berrettini
Player
Michael Vrbensky
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Gima
Player
Michael Vrbensky
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
4-6 6-1 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dino Prizmic
Player
Michael Vrbensky
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Michael Vrbensky
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michael Vrbensky
Player
Botond Kisantal
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
39%
(
16 of
41)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
13 of
16)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Michael Vrbensky
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michael Vrbensky
Player
Evan Furness
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
51 of
91)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
29 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Michael Vrbensky
Player
Alexander Donski
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Vrbensky
Player
Siim Troost
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
6
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
John Echeverria
Player
Michael Vrbensky
57%
(
53 of
93)
1st Serve %
58%
(
59 of
102)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
35 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
50 of
102)
108
Total Points Won
87
|
6-2 6-7(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Kym Vs Vrbensky Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Jerome Kym
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
