Jenson Brooksby vs Taro Daniel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W L L W L
Form
L W L L L L L L L LHead-2-Head: Brooksby 1 - 0 Daniel
They have played 2 sets in total, with Brooksby winning 2 and Daniel winning 0. The last match between Brooksby and Daniel was at the US Men's Clay Court Championship - Houston, 31-03-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Jenson Brooksby getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jenson Brooksby | 1 |
| Taro Daniel | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: US Men's Clay Court Championship - Houston(31-03-2025)
Jenson Brooksby
Taro Daniel
6
4
6
4
| Brooksby | Stats | Daniel |
|---|---|---|
| 55% (11-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 20% (4-16) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 165 | Ranking | 144 |
| 33 | Highest Rank | 58 |
| 24 | Age | 32 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 7 | Titles | 14 |
| 65% (168-92) | Career Total W/L | 57% (573-426) |
| $1,864,230 | Career Prize Money | $2,262,594 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Khachanov VS Ofner PREDICTION Clay
Gonet Geneva Open - Geneva atp
22 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Basilashvili VS Vacherot PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris atp
21 May 2025 / Q2 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Taro Daniel
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 8 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:28:16 | Average Match Time | 1:28:16 |
| 57% (30/53) | 1st Serve % | 55% (36/66) |
| 77% (23/30) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (24/36) |
| 78% (18/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (16/30) |
| 40% (2/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 39% (26/66) | Return Points Win % | 23% (12/53) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Brooksby vs Daniel Match Preview :
When evaluating the forthcoming tennis match, the performance of the players in various statistical categories can offer critical insights into who might likely emerge victorious. In terms of second serve performance over the last six months, Brooksby has shown superiority, winning 47.02% of points compared to Daniel's 43.15%. This particular statistic is a noteworthy predictor of the match outcome.
Return game capabilities also highlight a discrepancy between the players. Recently, Brooksby has captured 47.85% of his opponent's second serve points, while Daniel has managed 41.28%. For first serve returns, Brooksby's success rate stands at 26.07%, surpassing Daniel's 21.49%. These figures signal Brooksby's stronger return game, critical in head-to-head matchups.
Analyzing performances under pressure, Daniel has shown better resilience, having saved 58.5% of breakpoints, compared to Brooksby's 45.88%. This could potentially give Daniel an edge in crucial moments during the match.
Over the past year, Brooksby holds a slight edge in match victories, having won 45.45% of his games (W/L 5/6), while Daniel's win portion is 44.26% (W/L 27/34). This serves as a preliminary head-to-head performance indicator between the two competitors.
Surface preference adds another layer of comparison. Brooksby's best career win percentage is on clay at 67% (W/L 24/12), while grass proves less favorable at 58% (W/L 7/5). Daniel also achieves his best win ratio on clay at 60% (W/L 304/202) and struggles most on grass at 32% (W/L 7/15).
Levels of play contrast markedly between the competitors. Brooksby has mainly contended at the Masters series, securing a 50% win rate (W/L 2/2), as opposed to Daniel's better performance at Challenger and ITF events > $10K, winning 64% (W/L 16/9). Match level could be pivotal in determining who has the upper hand, relative to their historical acclimatization.
Examining opponent quality provides further insights; Brooksby has faced rivals with an average ranking of 114.36, more challenging than Daniel's average opponent rank of 179.84 over the past year. Going into a deciding set, historically, Brooksby is slightly superior, having won 40% of such sets, while Daniel sits at 35%.
During breakpoint opportunities, critical for live betting, Brooksby has capitalized on 31.43% of chances compared to Daniel's 25.19%. Such break-conversion rates potentially favor Brooksby in converting pivotal points during the match.
Considering all these metrics, Brooksby's slightly superior second serve performance, return game advantage, and higher quality of opponents faced suggest that he may have the upper hand in this matchup. Therefore, the statistical analysis leans towards a prediction in favor of Brooksby emerging victorious.
Brooksby vs Daniel Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Jenson Brooksby Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Cameron Norrie
Player
Jenson Brooksby
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Radu Albot
63%
(
58 of
92)
1st Serve %
69%
(
53 of
77)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
39 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Jenson Brooksby
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
70)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Jenson Brooksby
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
62)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Frances Tiafoe
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Tommy Paul
68%
(
74 of
109)
1st Serve %
56%
(
62 of
111)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
41%
(
45 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
42 of
111)
106
Total Points Won
114
|
7-6(5) 3-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Aleksandar Kovacevic
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
87
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Alejandro Tabilo
58%
(
57 of
99)
1st Serve %
50%
(
58 of
115)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
43 of
58)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
35 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
44 of
115)
108
Total Points Won
106
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Taro Daniel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyrian Jacquet
Player
Taro Daniel
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
10
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Taro Daniel
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
11
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Taro Daniel
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
77 of
120)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
45 of
77)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
54 of
120)
104
Total Points Won
87
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cristian Garin
Player
Taro Daniel
50%
(
19 of
38)
1st Serve %
47%
(
20 of
43)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Taro Daniel
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Taro Daniel
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Darwin Blanch
Player
Taro Daniel
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
43 of
51)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
23 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
97
Total Points Won
69
|
6-7(8) 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Player
Taro Daniel
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
23 of
41)
11
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65% (168/92) | Win/Loss | 57% (573/426) |
| 60% (373/246) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (1317/1043) |
| 54% (3080/2616) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (11501/10652) |
| 64% (105/58) | Hard Win/Loss | 56% (203/161) |
| 67% (30/15) | Clay Win/Loss | 59% (304/208) |
| 65% (26/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (59/42) |
| 58% (7/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 32% (7/15) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 467 | Aces Total | 2476 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 339 | Total Double Faults | 2008 |
| 1:30:49 | Average Match Time | 1:23:2 |
| 341.66 | Average Opponent Rank | 488.21 |
| 66% (10531/15936) | 1st Serve % | 63% (35705/57116) |
| 67% (7023/10531) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (24205/35705) |
| 52% (2785/5405) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (10890/21402) |
| 45% (725/1615) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (2408/5602) |
| 41% (6518/15827) | Return Points Win % | 39% (22059/56245) |
| 64% (16/9) | Slam W/L | 46% (37/44) |
| 58% (15/11) | Masters W/L | 44% (36/45) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 53% (8/7) |
| 65% (35/19) | Main Tour W/L | 51% (127/122) |
| 65% (35/19) | Challenger W/L | 63% (230/136) |
| 66% (67/34) | Futures W/L | 66% (133/69) |
| 65% (153/236) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (549/939) |
| 57% (12/21) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 27% (13/49) |
| 61% (40/66) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (162/308) |
| 63% (45/72) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (148/298) |
| 91% (154/140) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (590/498) |
| 9% (154/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (590/91) |
| 25% (106/27) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (409/72) |
Brooksby vs. Daniel Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
