M. Landaluce
To Win
F. A. Gomez
To Win
Jenson Brooksby vs Federico Agustin Gomez Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W L L W L
Form
L W W W L L L L L WH2H: Brooksby 1 - 0 Gomez
They have played 3 sets in total, with Brooksby winning 2 and Gomez winning 1. The last match between Brooksby and Gomez was at the US Men's Clay Court Championship - Houston, 29-03-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Clay, with Jenson Brooksby getting the victory 3-6 7-6(5) 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jenson Brooksby | 1 |
| Federico Agustin Gomez | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: US Men's Clay Court Championship - Houston(29-03-2025)
Jenson Brooksby
Federico Agustin Gomez
3
6
7
6
6
4
| Brooksby | Stats | Gomez |
|---|---|---|
| 55% (11-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 30% (6-14) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 165 | Ranking | 142 |
| 33 | Highest Rank | 133 |
| 24 | Age | 28 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 7 | Titles | 5 |
| 65% (168-92) | Career Total W/L | 61% (186-119) |
| $1,861,030 | Career Prize Money | $85,175 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
21 May 2025 / Q2 round
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Parrizas-Diaz VS Bulgaru PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
20 May 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Parry VS Samsonova PREDICTION Clay
Internationaux de Strasbourg - Strasbourg wta
20 May 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 |
Stats 
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Federico Agustin Gomez
64%
(
61 of
96)
1st Serve %
60%
(
72 of
120)
5
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
10
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
47 of
72)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
39 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
51 of
120)
108
Total Points Won
108
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 16 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 10 |
| 2:38:58 | Average Match Time | 2:38:58 |
| 64% (61/96) | 1st Serve % | 60% (72/120) |
| 64% (39/61) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (47/72) |
| 51% (18/35) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (22/48) |
| 36% (4/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (4/8) |
| 43% (51/120) | Return Points Win % | 41% (39/96) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Brooksby vs Gomez Match Preview :
How crucial is the second serve in determining a tennis match's outcome? For the past six months, Gomez has secured 45.7% of second-serve points, whereas Brooksby slightly edges ahead with 47.39%. When predicting match results, the second serve’s performance is an indispensable metric, often illuminating the likely winner before the first ball is even served.
Let's delve deeper into return game dynamics. Recently, Gomez has managed to capture 42.48% of points on their opponent’s second serve, while Brooksby has a slight upper hand with 47.95%. First serve returns are another story—Gomez stands at 22.52%, and Brooksby at 25.59%. These figures serve as a mirror to their head-to-head prospects, giving a glimpse into who might emerge victorious under pressure.
Speaking of pressure, how well do these players fend off breakpoints? Gomez has been adept at saving 58.48% of breakpoints, compared to Brooksby’s 45.07%. This has significant implications, especially for those casting bets mid-game, highlighting Gomez’s resilience.
A broader glance at their performance over the past year—for Gomez, a triumph story of 63.51% match wins (W/L 47/27), compared to Brooksby’s 33.33% (W/L 3/6). Does this suggest a pattern in their play? Absolutely. It offers a telling overview of their head-to-head prowess.
The surface could be a decisive factor in their showdown. Gomez boasts his highest career winning percentage on clay at 63% (W/L 120/70), while Brooksby shines brightest on indoor hard courts, triumphing 65% (W/L 26/14). Grassy terrains, however, challenge Brooksby (58% win rate), whereas indoor hard courts are less favorable for Gomez (38%).
What about the competition level? Gomez has dominated in the Challengers/ITF circuits, with a 66.67% win rate (W/L 36/18), whereas Brooksby’s focus has been on the Masters series, with a 50% success rate (W/L 2/2). Thus, the caliber of opposition each faces varies substantially.
Ranking comparisons further depict contrasting journeys. Over the last year, Gomez’s adversaries had an average ranking of 308.54, while Brooksby faced considerably tougher opponents, averaging a rank of 82.56. Clearly, Brooksby has been tested against stiffer competition.
If the match extends into a deciding set, where do they stand? Gomez would seem favored, having won 72% of deciding sets within the past year. Brooksby trails considerably, with a mere 25%. This stat is pivotal for those betting live as every point intensifies.
Converting breakpoints is yet another facet to examine. Gomez has recently succeeded 23.46% of the time in capitalizing on these critical moments, whereas Brooksby impresses with a 30.51% conversion rate. A key indicator for in-match betting, this signifies Brooke's ability to seize pivotal opportunities.
All things considered, it appears Gomez has a slight advantage, particularly when pressured and in deciding situations. Brooksby, despite facing tougher opponents, might find it challenging to overcome Gomez's impressive recent form and efficiency in converting under duress. Thus, if one had to predict, Gomez might just edge out a win in this tightly contested battle.
Brooksby vs Gomez Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Jenson Brooksby Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Cameron Norrie
Player
Jenson Brooksby
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Radu Albot
63%
(
58 of
92)
1st Serve %
69%
(
53 of
77)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
39 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Jenson Brooksby
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
70)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Jenson Brooksby
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
62)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Frances Tiafoe
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Tommy Paul
68%
(
74 of
109)
1st Serve %
56%
(
62 of
111)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
41%
(
45 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
42 of
111)
106
Total Points Won
114
|
7-6(5) 3-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Aleksandar Kovacevic
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
87
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Alejandro Tabilo
58%
(
57 of
99)
1st Serve %
50%
(
58 of
115)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
43 of
58)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
35 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
44 of
115)
108
Total Points Won
106
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Federico Agustin Gomez Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Federico Agustin Gomez
Player
Mae Malige
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
44%
(
24 of
55)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesco Passaro
Player
Federico Agustin Gomez
58%
(
61 of
105)
1st Serve %
63%
(
73 of
116)
5
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
7
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
50 of
73)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
34 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
44 of
116)
115
Total Points Won
106
|
7-6(6) 6-7(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Federico Agustin Gomez
52%
(
53 of
101)
1st Serve %
56%
(
61 of
108)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
7
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
42%
(
20 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
44%
(
44 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
52 of
108)
109
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andres Andrade
Player
Federico Agustin Gomez
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Federico Agustin Gomez
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
1
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
55
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 3-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Federico Agustin Gomez
70%
(
54 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
30%
(
7 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
33 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Agustin Gomez
Player
Filip Cristian Jianu
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Agustin Gomez
Player
Inaki Montes-De La Torre
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
64
|
6-0 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65% (168/92) | Win/Loss | 61% (186/119) |
| 60% (373/246) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (417/286) |
| 54% (3080/2616) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (3496/3103) |
| 64% (105/58) | Hard Win/Loss | 60% (55/37) |
| 67% (30/15) | Clay Win/Loss | 62% (124/76) |
| 65% (26/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54% (7/6) |
| 58% (7/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.4 |
| 467 | Aces Total | 1289 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
| 339 | Total Double Faults | 994 |
| 1:30:49 | Average Match Time | 1:28:58 |
| 341.66 | Average Opponent Rank | 383.04 |
| 66% (10531/15936) | 1st Serve % | 59% (10554/17916) |
| 67% (7023/10531) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (7423/10554) |
| 52% (2785/5405) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (3656/7361) |
| 45% (725/1615) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (743/1756) |
| 41% (6518/15827) | Return Points Win % | 39% (6881/17421) |
| 64% (16/9) | Slam W/L | 50% (2/2) |
| 58% (15/11) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/3) |
| 65% (35/19) | Main Tour W/L | 47% (7/8) |
| 65% (35/19) | Challenger W/L | 63% (75/45) |
| 66% (67/34) | Futures W/L | 63% (102/61) |
| 65% (153/236) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (185/303) |
| 57% (12/21) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 61% (40/66) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (46/81) |
| 63% (45/72) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (49/95) |
| 91% (154/140) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (187/155) |
| 9% (154/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (187/32) |
| 25% (106/27) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (118/31) |
Brooksby vs. Gomez Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
