Prediction of Jenson Brooksby [168th] vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong [175th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W W W W W W L
Form
L W L L L W L W W LHead-To-Head: Brooksby 1 - 0 Wong
They have played 2 sets in total, with Brooksby winning 2 and Wong winning 0. The last match between Brooksby and Wong was at the San Diego Challenger, 26-02-2025, First, Hard with Jenson Brooksby getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jenson Brooksby | 1 |
| Chak Lam Coleman Wong | 0 |
| Brooksby | Stats | Wong |
|---|---|---|
| 59% (10-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 44% (7-9) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 168 | Ranking | 175 |
| 33 | Highest Rank | 128 |
| 24 | Age | 20 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 7 | Titles | 2 |
| 65% (167-90) | Career Total W/L | 56% (139-109) |
| $1,861,030 | Career Prize Money | $225,210 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:19:28 | Average Match Time | 1:19:28 |
| 58% (35/60) | 1st Serve % | 56% (35/62) |
| 66% (23/35) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (23/35) |
| 72% (18/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (13/27) |
| 38% (3/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/4) |
| 42% (26/62) | Return Points Win % | 32% (19/60) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jenson Brooksby vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Brooksby 1 - 0 Wong
Editorial Prediction:
Jenson Brooksby and Chia-Hao Wong are preparing to face off in a highly anticipated tennis match. Examining the data from recent form paints a compelling picture in predicting the likely winner of this face-off. Over the past six months, Brooksby has a second serve point-winning percentage of 33.33%, substantially trailing Wong's 48.08% in the same statistic. This discrepancy strongly indicates which player might hold the upper hand if the match hinges on second-serve exchanges.
Looking into the return game statistics, Brooksby has secured 49.38% of his opponent's second serve points in recent matches, slightly better than Wong's 45.97%. However, in terms of first serve returns, Wong demonstrates a distinct advantage, winning 28.65% compared to Brooksby's 22.76%. These figures align with the premise that Wong could have the edge in this match-up.
When analyzing performance under pressure, Wong again demonstrates superiority, having saved 65.45% of breakpoints in recent form, juxtaposed against Brooksby's 39.29% save rate. This data point is particularly useful for in-game betting sessions and suggests Wong's resilience in challenging scenarios. In terms of overall match performance over the last year, Wong boasts a match win percentage of 53.75% (W/L 43/37), while Brooksby has not recorded any match wins (W/L 0/3).
Surface preferences also provide insight. Brooksby's most successful surface has been indoor hard courts, where his win rate is 65% (W/L 26/14). Wong's best success is on hard courts, with a 60% win rate (W/L 112/76). Both players underperform on grass, but this detail might not impact their upcoming indoors hard-court clash. Additionally, Wong's experience against higher-ranked opponents averages around 250.86 compared to Brooksby's 85, potentially skewing head-to-head comparisons but emphasizing Wong's experience gain against a wider player pool.
A comparison of their ability to convert break points reveals closely matched performance, with Brooksby converting 35.71% of his opportunities and Wong similarly converting 34.32%. As for their player level and tournament experience, over the past year, Wong's proven track record in the Challengers/ITF tournaments with a 55.74% success rate (W/L 34/27) overshadows Brooksby's lack of match wins at that level (W/L 0/1).
Lastly, the deciding factor could be their contrasting performances in matches extending to deciding sets. Wong's 61% success rate in such scenarios starkly contrasts with Brooksby's 0% record, reinforcing the notion that Wong is better suited to clinching closely contested matches. Given these comprehensive statistics, Wong emerges as the favorite for the upcoming match against Brooksby.
Jenson Brooksby Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Jenson Brooksby
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
62)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Frances Tiafoe
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Tommy Paul
68%
(
74 of
109)
1st Serve %
56%
(
62 of
111)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
41%
(
45 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
42 of
111)
106
Total Points Won
114
|
7-6(5) 3-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Aleksandar Kovacevic
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
87
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Alejandro Tabilo
58%
(
57 of
99)
1st Serve %
50%
(
58 of
115)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
43 of
58)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
35 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
44 of
115)
108
Total Points Won
106
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Taro Daniel
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Patrick Maloney
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Federico Agustin Gomez
64%
(
61 of
96)
1st Serve %
60%
(
72 of
120)
5
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
10
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
47 of
72)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
39 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
51 of
120)
108
Total Points Won
108
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roman Safiullin
Player
Jenson Brooksby
72%
(
73 of
102)
1st Serve %
68%
(
53 of
78)
12
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
27 of
78)
91
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Jenson Brooksby
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
81)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
81)
78
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Chak Lam Coleman Wong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
67%
(
70 of
104)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
99)
10
Aces
15
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
36 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
33 of
99)
101
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(6) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Ben Shelton
66%
(
71 of
108)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
99)
8
Aces
17
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
53 of
67)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
38 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
28 of
99)
98
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(3) 2-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Daniel Altmaier
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
75%
(
36 of
48)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
0
91%
(
32 of
35)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
19%
(
10 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
16 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
11 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Billy Harris
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
96)
12
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
64%
(
27 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
30 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
96)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pavel Kotov
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
35 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
96)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(5) 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
50%
(
43 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
10
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
90
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Rudolf Molleker
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Brooksby vs Wong?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Brooksby Vs Wong is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65% (167/90) | Win/Loss | 56% (139/109) |
| 61% (371/241) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (311/267) |
| 54% (3052/2581) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (2848/2721) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.48 |
| 463 | Aces Total | 1313 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 332 | Total Double Faults | 502 |
| 1:30:39 | Average Match Time | 1:30:18 |
| 341.94 | Average Opponent Rank | 380.91 |
| 66% (10399/15721) | 1st Serve % | 60% (9161/15252) |
| 67% (6944/10399) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (6480/9161) |
| 52% (2748/5322) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (2947/6091) |
| 45% (717/1598) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (583/1447) |
| 41% (6437/15629) | Return Points Win % | 39% (5962/15383) |
| 65% (152/233) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (134/243) |
| 57% (12/21) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) |
| 61% (40/66) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (45/81) |
| 62% (44/71) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (46/81) |
| 91% (153/139) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (129/113) |
| 9% (153/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (129/16) |
| 26% (104/27) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (119/25) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
