Jennifer Wacker vs Vivien Gimla Important H2H Prediction Stats:

• Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wacker has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Gimla has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
• Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wacker, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gimla has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
• Under pressure analysis: Wacker has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gimla has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
• Performance overview: Over the last year Wacker has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Gimla winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
• Best surface: Wacker has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 34/ 38), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 8% (W/L 1/ 11). Gimla has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 9), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 7).
• Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Wacker winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Wacker winning 2 and Gimla winning 0. The last match between Wacker and Gimla was at the Heraklion, 06-11-2017, Q1 round, Clay with Jennifer Wacker getting the victory .
• Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
• Deciding set H2H prediction: Wacker and Gimla have played a deciding set 0 times, with Wacker winning 0 times and Gimla 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
• Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Wacker winning 0, and Gimla 0.
• Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wacker has played against opponents with an average rank of while Gimla has played against players with an average rank of .
• Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wacker has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gimla has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
• Break point conversion: In recent form, Wacker has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gimla has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.