Jelle Sels vs Tyler Zink Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 01 Jul at 03:35 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Sels vs T. Zink

NED
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Sels 1 - 0 Zink
They have played 2 sets in total, with Jelle Sels winning 2 and Tyler Zink winning 0. The last match between Jelle Sels and Tyler Zink was at the Troyes Challenger, 01-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Jelle Sels getting the victory 6-2 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sels | 1 |
| Zink | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Troyes Challenger(07-01-25)
J. Sels vs T. Zink H2H Profile
J. Sels vs T. Zink Match Preview:
- How does the second serve performance compare between the players? Zink has a slightly lower win rate on their second serve (43.97%) compared to Sels (44.24%).
- In return games, Sels is more successful, winning 46.56% of points on opponents' second serves, compared to Zink's 44.82%.
- What about first serve returns? Sels again leads with a 27.54% win rate, while Zink manages 25.31%.
- In handling pressure scenarios, Sels shows a stronger performance by saving 59.6% of breakpoints versus Zink's 52.63%.
- Over the past year, Zink has a superior match win percentage at 68.35% compared to Sels's 52.7%.
- Zink performs best on indoor hard courts with a 62% win rate, while Sels favors clay with a 57% win rate.
- Level of competition faced? Zink often competes in lower-level tournaments (Futures/ITF $10K) with a win rate of 77.78%, whereas Sels plays at the higher Challengers/ITF level with a 51.85% success rate.
- Opponent rank analysis indicates Zink competes against lower-ranked players (average rank 402.33) compared to Sels (average rank 381.64).
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Zink is likely favored, winning 77% of such scenarios compared to Sels's 59%.
- For break point scenarios, Sels is more efficient with a conversion rate of 34.41% compared to Zink's 30.67%.
Editorial Prediction (July 1, 2025, UTC):
As the players prepare to face off, a careful look at their recent performances and stats offers some insights. Sels shows slightly better effectiveness on second serves and a notable edge in both first and second serve return games. Their higher breakpoint conversion rate and stronger performance under pressure further underscore this advantage.
However, Zink's higher overall match win percentage over the past year may suggest a level of consistency and competitiveness, albeit achieved primarily in lower-level matches.
Considering the overall matchup dynamics, Sels's slight statistical advantages and experience against higher-ranked opponents could tip the scales in their favor. This match is poised to be competitive, but Sels appears to hold the edge based on the recent form and stats.
Ultimately, Sels is the predicted winner for this upcoming tennis match.
Jelle Sels vs Tyler Zink Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Sels vs T. Zink H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 7 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:44:30 | Average Match Time | 1:44:30 |
| 59% (35/59) | 1st Serve % | 42% (31/74) |
| 74% (26/35) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (19/31) |
| 63% (15/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (19/43) |
| 36% (4/11) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (1/3) |
| 49% (36/74) | Return Points Win % | 31% (18/59) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Sels Recent Matches Played
T. Zink Recent Matches Played

J. Sels vs T. Zink Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.72% (400/331) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.59% (101/84) |
| 53.33% (881/771) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.51% (220/199) |
| 51.27% (8010/7614) | Games Win/Loss | 50.98% (2060/1981) |
| 54.10% (66/56) | Hard Win/Loss | 52.08% (50/46) |
| 56.10% (230/180) | Clay Win/Loss | 57.41% (31/23) |
| 53.89% (104/89) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57.58% (19/14) |
| 0.00% (0/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 0.36 | Aces Per Game | 0.42 |
| 2742 | Aces Total | 822 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 1472 | Total Double Faults | 380 |
| 1:26:10 | Average Match Time | 1:34:38 |
| 487.92 | Average Opponent Rank | 152.31 |
| 59% (24818/42257) | 1st Serve % | 59% (6916/11784) |
| 70% (17325/24818) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (4876/6916) |
| 50% (8726/17442) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (2434/4868) |
| 42% (1685/3991) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (425/1108) |
| 39% (16387/41889) | Return Points Win % | 38% (4363/11469) |
| 0.00% (0/4) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.00% (0/10) | Main Tour W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 48.70% (150/158) | Challenger W/L | 44.90% (22/27) |
| 61.27% (250/158) | Futures W/L | 59.09% (78/54) |
| 55% (393/716) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (100/184) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (109/222) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (26/54) |
| 57% (115/202) | Deciding Set Win % | 62% (31/50) |
| 87% (379/329) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (102/89) |
| 13% (379/50) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (102/13) |
| 20% (351/69) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (83/12) |