J. Paolini
To Win
J. Ostapenko
To Win
Jelena Ostapenko vs Louisa Chirico Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W W W W L W
Form
W W W L L W W L L LHead-2-Head: Ostapenko 2 - 0 Chirico
They have played 5 sets in total, with Ostapenko winning 4 and Chirico winning 1. The last match between Ostapenko and Chirico was at the Credit One Charleston Open - Charleston, 02-04-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Clay, with Jelena Ostapenko getting the victory 7-5 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jelena Ostapenko | 2 |
| Louisa Chirico | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Credit One Charleston Open - Charleston(02-04-2025)
7
5
6
2
| Ostapenko | Stats | Chirico |
|---|---|---|
| 57% (13-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 43% (10-13) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 18 | Ranking | 178 |
| 5 | Highest Rank | 58 |
| 27 | Age | 28 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 16 | Titles | 7 |
| 62% (404-249) | Career Total W/L | 56% (331-264) |
| $11,349,342 | Career Prize Money | $649,838 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
12 May 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
Upcoming Match
12 May 2025 / Q3
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Giron VS Hurkacz PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome atp
11 May 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Dellien VS Minaur PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome atp
12 May 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-2 |
Stats 
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Louisa Chirico
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
| 4-6 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Louisa Chirico
45%
(
40 of
88)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
102)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
40%
(
19 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
40 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
55 of
102)
103
Total Points Won
87
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 29 | Games Won | 18 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 10 |
| 1:38:52 | Average Match Time | 1:38:52 |
| 58% (89/154) | 1st Serve % | 63% (107/169) |
| 70% (62/89) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (57/107) |
| 37% (24/65) | 2nd Serve Win % | 32% (20/62) |
| 56% (14/25) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 57% (8/14) |
| 54% (92/169) | Return Points Win % | 44% (68/154) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ostapenko vs Chirico Match Preview :
What does a deeper dive into the second serve performance reveal about Ostapenko and Chirico over the past six months? Ostapenko has secured 36.73% of points on her second serve, while Chirico leads slightly with 40.51%. Such stats are pivotal for predicting match outcomes, as a strong second serve can often turn the tide of a game.
Diving into return game statistics, Ostapenko has won 54.95% of her opponents' second serve points, compared to Chirico's 52.15%. On the first serve returns, these numbers are closer, with Chirico ahead at 32.76% versus Ostapenko's 31.18%. These figures are significant indicators of who might dominate the rally exchanges in their next face-off.
Examining under pressure performance, Ostapenko has managed to save 50% of breakpoints faced recently, with Chirico trailing at 46.39%. When it comes to match predictions, assessing the ability to handle breakpoint pressure is a critical element, often swaying the balance in a tightly contested game.
Looking at the players' overall win rates from the past year, Ostapenko has won 48.78% of her matches, while Chirico boasts a higher success rate with 56.52%. This performance overview plays significantly into predictions, suggesting Chirico may have a slight edge in overall form.
Managing match surfaces is another determinant of success. Ostapenko thrives on grass courts, holding a win percentage of 69% (W/L 53/24), though hard courts have seen her perform at 55% (W/L 143/119). Conversely, Chirico excels on clay with a 62% win rate (W/L 168/104), yet struggles on grass, winning just 38% (W/L 5/8). Hence, the court type could heavily influence this matchup.
Concerning player levels, Ostapenko's engagements have primarily been in Masters series, winning 57.89% of such matches last year (W/L 11/8). Chirico, on the other hand, has played the majority in Challengers/ITF tournaments >$10K, capturing 60.78% of victories (W/L 31/20). These event levels can give insight into the varying strengths each player faces in competition quality.
They have faced each other once in the past, with Ostapenko coming out on top in a thrilling duel at the 2017 French Open. Ostapenko triumphed in three sets, displaying resilience by clawing back from a set down to win 4-6, 6-3, 6-2. Their past head-to-head encounters were notably competitive, averaging 1 hour and 54 minutes, potentially indicating another tense battle could be on the horizon.
In terms of extreme pressure situations, the absence of tiebreaks between the two might suggest they are adept at resolving points without intense tie-break battles. Looking at the deciding set performances, Ostapenko has been impressive, winning 60% of her last 12 months' deciding sets; Chirico has secured 45% of hers. The implication here is that Ostapenko might be more reliable if the match goes the full distance.
Interestingly, over the past year, Ostapenko has contended against opponents averaging a rank of 56.15, while Chirico’s adversaries have averaged 286.87. This disparity in opponent ranking could suggest that Ostapenko is more battle-hardened against higher-tier competition.
Now, blending these insights and numbers, who stands out as the possible victor? While Chirico's superior serve stats and overall form are convincing, Ostapenko's robust return game, decisive head-to-head win, and experience against higher-ranked players tip the balance in her favor. Given the comprehensive examination of these performance metrics, Ostapenko emerges as the likely winner when they next meet on court.
Jelena Ostapenko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Rebecca Sramkova
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
4
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
4
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
33%
(
11 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
47%
(
35 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
81
Total Points Won
79
|
1-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anastasija Sevastova
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
8
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
35)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
47%
(
27 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
45 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Aryna Sabalenka
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
65)
4
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Ekaterina Alexandrova
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Iga Swiatek
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve %
50%
(
43 of
86)
5
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
8
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Emma Navarro
59%
(
67 of
114)
1st Serve %
64%
(
60 of
94)
7
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
45%
(
21 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
42%
(
48 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
109
Total Points Won
99
|
7-5 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Dayana Yastremska
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
53
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Danielle Rose Collins
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
53%
(
38 of
72)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Louisa Chirico
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Louisa Chirico Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Dominika Salkova
Player
Louisa Chirico
52%
(
47 of
90)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
0
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
11
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
42%
(
18 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
42%
(
10 of
24)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
51%
(
46 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
54 of
94)
98
Total Points Won
86
|
7-5 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Louisa Chirico
55%
(
39 of
71)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
56)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Darja Semenistaja
Player
Louisa Chirico
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Cristina Diaz Adrover
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
2
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
48%
(
26 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Dominika Salkova
50%
(
35 of
70)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Player
Louisa Chirico
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Louisa Chirico
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Erika Andreeva
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
60%
(
54 of
90)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
3
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
40 of
54)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
36 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
64%
(
70 of
109)
1st Serve %
75%
(
82 of
109)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
48 of
82)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
42%
(
46 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
109)
112
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(4) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Ana Konjuh
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
49%
(
36 of
73)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
6
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (404/249) | Win/Loss | 56% (331/264) |
| 58% (886/635) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (743/637) |
| 54% (7479/6492) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (6596/6218) |
| 55% (143/119) | Hard Win/Loss | 50% (125/125) |
| 67% (115/56) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (170/109) |
| 65% (93/50) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (31/22) |
| 69% (53/24) | Grass Win/Loss | 38% (5/8) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 1596 | Aces Total | 883 |
| 0.43 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 2927 | Total Double Faults | 2079 |
| 1:13:14 | Average Match Time | 1:14:7 |
| 358.92 | Average Opponent Rank | 460.27 |
| 56% (20351/36392) | 1st Serve % | 59% (19092/32273) |
| 65% (13290/20351) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (11766/19092) |
| 44% (6972/16027) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (5859/13179) |
| 49% (2260/4611) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1856/3892) |
| 46% (16674/36064) | Return Points Win % | 45% (14183/31365) |
| 62% (59/36) | Slam W/L | 40% (16/24) |
| 54% (87/75) | Masters W/L | 45% (13/16) |
| 58% (18/13) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 61% (138/90) | Main Tour W/L | 47% (51/57) |
| 66% (53/27) | Challenger W/L | 59% (238/164) |
| 86% (49/8) | Futures W/L | 81% (13/3) |
| 62% (394/639) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (321/585) |
| 50% (2/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (74/132) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (85/150) |
| 62% (136/221) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (108/201) |
| 86% (382/330) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (319/269) |
| 14% (382/52) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (319/50) |
| 27% (271/72) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (276/59) |
Ostapenko vs. Chirico Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
