Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg vs Andrea Basso Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Schulenburg vs Basso analysis and find out who is favored!
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg vs Andrea Basso Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Schulenburg has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Basso has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Schulenburg, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Basso has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Schulenburg has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Basso has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Schulenburg has won 73.33% of matches played (W/L 11/ 4), with Basso winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Schulenburg has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 69% (W/L 11/ 5), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4). Basso has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 212/ 154), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 27% (W/L 4/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Schulenburg has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 73.33% of matches (W/L 11/ 4), where as Basso has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Schulenburg winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Schulenburg winning 0 and Basso winning 2. The last match between Schulenburg and Basso was at the M15 L'Aquila, 15-07-2021, Second, Clay with Andrea Basso getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:24:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Schulenburg and Basso have played a deciding set 0 times, with Schulenburg winning 0 times and Basso 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Schulenburg winning 0, and Basso 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Schulenburg has played against opponents with an average rank of 191.27 while Basso has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Schulenburg has won 80% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Basso has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Schulenburg has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Basso has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Schulenburg 0 - 1 Basso
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
900
Rank
301
High
30
Age
L
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
59% (38-26)
Career Total W/L
56% (270-210)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Schulenburg VS Basso H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg | Andrea Basso |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 5 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:24:0 | 1:24:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 51% (33/65) | 47% (22/47) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 64% (21/33) | 82% (18/22) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (14/32) | 68% (17/25) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/3) | 50% (4/8) |
| Return Points W% | 26% (12/47) | 46% (30/65) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Schulenburg VS Basso H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Andrea Basso
Player
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
47%
(
22 of
47)
1st Serve %
51%
(
33 of
65)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg | Andrea Basso |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Nicolas Zanellato
Player
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
Player
Tim Handel
65%
(
66 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
71 of
111)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
44 of
71)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
111)
108
Total Points Won
105
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
Player
Kilian Feldbausch
45%
(
26 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francois Musitelli
Player
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
62%
(
52 of
84)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
93)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
14 of
45)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
93)
99
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
Player
Karl Friberg
60%
(
63 of
105)
1st Serve %
69%
(
87 of
126)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
57 of
87)
60%
(
25 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
11 of
39)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
40%
(
42 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
58 of
126)
121
Total Points Won
110
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
Player
Guy Den Ouden
64%
(
62 of
97)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
8
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
35 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
104)
105
Total Points Won
96
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
Player
Younes Lalami Laaroussi
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
74%
(
57 of
77)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
24%
(
14 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
65%
(
26 of
40)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
57
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
Player
Liam Gavrielides
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve %
62%
(
21 of
34)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
7 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
35
Total Points Won
24
|
6-4 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Andrea Basso Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Edoardo Lavagno
Player
Andrea Basso
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
64
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrea Basso
Player
Davide Galoppini
52%
(
41 of
79)
1st Serve %
77%
(
43 of
56)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
77%
(
10 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrea Basso
Player
Giorgio Tabacco
53%
(
40 of
76)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
3-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Basso
Player
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
44%
(
14 of
32)
1st Serve %
50%
(
14 of
28)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
9 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
39
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Titouan Droguet
Player
Andrea Basso
69%
(
68 of
99)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
90)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
38%
(
38 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
90)
103
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrea Basso
Player
Davide Galoppini
47%
(
33 of
70)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
88)
5
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
31 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
46 of
88)
85
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrea Basso
Player
Nicolo Pozzani
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Basso
Player
Giuseppe La Vela
52%
(
47 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
94)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
34%
(
31 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
102
Total Points Won
82
|
5-7 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sandro Kopp
Player
Andrea Basso
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
42 of
74)
3
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
6
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jelle Sels
Player
Andrea Basso
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Schulenburg Vs Basso Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
