J. Clarke
To Win
N. Chappell
To Win
Jay Clarke vs Masamichi Imamura Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W W W W W
Form
W L W W W L W L W LHead-2-Head: Clarke 1 - 1 Imamura
They have played 4 sets in total, with Clarke winning 2 and Imamura winning 2. The last match between Clarke and Imamura was at the Pune Challenger, 18-02-2025, First, Hard with Masamichi Imamura getting the victory 7-6(2) 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jay Clarke | 1 |
| Masamichi Imamura | 1 |
Pune Challenger(18-02-2025)
7
6
6
2
Upcoming Match
- / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Svitolina VS Swiatek PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
24 Mar 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Monfils VS Korda PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
25 Mar 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(2) 6-2 |
Stats 
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Jay Clarke
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Masamichi Imamura
50%
(
22 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
95%
(
21 of
22)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
1
2
Sets Won
2
20
Games Won
18
12
Aces (Total)
6
7
Total Double Faults
4
1:25:27
Average Match Time
1:25:27
56% (59/105)
1st Serve %
61% (76/124)
71% (42/59)
1st Serve Win %
68% (52/76)
52% (24/46)
2nd Serve Win %
46% (22/48)
55% (6/11)
Break Points Won % (Total)
56% (5/9)
40% (50/124)
Return Points Win %
37% (39/105)
50% (1/2)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
50% (1/2)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
100% (1/1)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (1/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jay Clarke vs Masamichi Imamura Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Jay Clarke 1 - 1 Masamichi Imamura
- Recent Second Serve Performance: Over the past six months, both Clarke and Imamura have showcased commendable second serve performance. Clarke has triumphed in 49.96% of points on their second serve, while Imamura has accomplished a slight edge, winning 53.68%. This statistic holds a significant correlation with accurately predicting the outcome of matches.
- Return Game Statistics: Scrutinizing their recent form, Clarke emerges as the victor in terms of winning their opponent's second serve points, securing an impressive 55.53%. Imamura, on the other hand, has maintained a solid performance, winning 50.87%. The statistics for first serve returns are also noteworthy: Clarke claims a 35.92% success rate, while Imamura stands at 32.18%. These figures strongly influence determining the favorite in their head-to-head (H2H) matchup.
- Analysis Under Pressure: When faced with breakpoints, Clarke has shown resilience, successfully saving an impressive 59.5%. Similarly, Imamura's ability to ward off pressure is commendable, with a save rate of 61.81%. Such statistics prove invaluable for those engaged in in-game betting predictions.
- Performance Overview: Assessing their performance over the past year, Clarke has triumphed in 63.75% of matches played, boasting an impressive win/loss ratio of 51/29. Imamura, not to be outdone, has achieved a marginally higher success rate of 64.37%, with a win/loss record of 56/31. These numbers present a comprehensive overview of their head-to-head prediction.
- Surface Specialization: When it comes to surface specialization, Clarke shines on clay courts, winning 66% of matches (146/74). Conversely, their efficacy on grass courts diminishes, with a mere 26% success rate (11/31). In contrast, Imamura excels on indoor hard courts, showcasing a remarkable win percentage of 67% (6/9). However, their performance falters on clay courts, with a 50% win rate (6/6).
- Player Level: During the past year, Clarke has primarily participated in tournaments with a $10K level, such as Futures, Satellites, and ITF, triumphing in an outstanding 73.21% of matches (41/15). Imamura, similarly, has faced formidable opponents in these tournaments, emerging triumphant in an impressive 70.31% of matches (45/19). It is important to note that when comparing players' statistics to predict favorites, such assessments are contingent on the tournament level they have been competing in.
- Head-to-Head Encounters: Clarke and Imamura have clashed on one previous occasion. In this encounter, Clarke emerged victorious, seizing the win while Imamura endured defeat. The duration of their sets totaled two, favoring Clarke, who conquered both sets. The last faceoff between Clarke and Imamura transpired at the New Delhi Challenger on 11-02-2025, on hard courts, with Clarke prevailing with an impressive 6-1, 6-4 triumph.
- Duration of Head-to-Head Matches: When reflecting on their past head-to-head matches, the average duration between these competitors has settled at 1 hour, 14 minutes, and 13 seconds.
- Predicting Deciding Sets: Throughout their encounters, Clarke and Imamura have engaged in zero deciding sets. Consequently, neither player has clinched victory in such situations. This information significantly aids in predicting the outcome if the match were to extend its course.
- Head-to-Head Under Extreme Pressure: Notably, Clarke and Imamura have yet to reach any tiebreak situations in their head-to-head matches. None have been won by Clarke, nor by Imamura.
- Opponent Quality Statistics: Over the past 12 months, Clarke has confronted opponents with an average ranking of 399.16, demonstrating their ability to contend against formidable rivals. Imamura, too, has showcased resilience by competing against players with an average ranking of 431.91.
- Deciding Set Performance Across Matches: In those instances where matches were pushed to a deciding set, Clarke has emerged victorious in 46% of these encounters within the last 12 months. Imamura, on the other hand, has demonstrated a slightly higher success rate, triumphing in 54% of deciding sets in all matches played on the tour. These statistics provide invaluable insight for live predictions and betting enthusiasts.
- Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: Although past performance serves as a valuable asset for predicting tennis matches, the ongoing events demand a thorough evaluation of current statistics. Such analysis becomes instrumental in gauging the prowess and form of players. For specific insights on the current event, please refer to the section below. Additionally, it is crucial to acknowledge that certain players may exhibit exceptional performances at particular events, ultimately influencing their outcome.
- Break Point Conversion: In recent times, Clarke has capitalized on 46.04% of breakpoint opportunities. Imamura has also showcased proficiency in converting these chances, successfully seizing 40.75% of their opponents' service games. Such statistics prove influential when considering in-game live betting tips during critical breakpoint situations.
- If you possess an avid interest in models dedicated to predicting tennis matches, peruse this article. Warning: This article is tailored for statistics enthusiasts.
Jay Clarke Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Alexandr Binda
66%
(
54 of
82)
1st Serve %
50%
(
36 of
72)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
85
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Aryan Shah
64%
(
58 of
91)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
2
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
33 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
90)
93
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Nitin Kumar Sinha
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
22 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Ishaque Eqbal
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
58)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Kriish Tyagi
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Woobin Shin
54%
(
52 of
96)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
92)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
35 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
102
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Stefan Vujic
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
66 of
100)
2
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
100)
94
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Madhwin Kamath
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
46%
(
25 of
54)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Abhinav Sanjeev Shanmugam
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
49%
(
25 of
51)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Siddhant Banthia
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Masamichi Imamura Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Mikalai Haliak
Player
Masamichi Imamura
47%
(
44 of
94)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
48%
(
24 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
44%
(
41 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Zhenxiong Dong
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tianhui Zhang
Player
Masamichi Imamura
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
34%
(
26 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
21 of
57)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Zhengyu Sun
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
50%
(
33 of
66)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
50%
(
27 of
54)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
34 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
2-6 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Masamichi Imamura
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Jay Clarke
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Blake Ellis
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
4
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
59
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Kasidit Samrej
67%
(
70 of
104)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
106)
5
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
50 of
65)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
36 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
35 of
106)
103
Total Points Won
107
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Masamichi Imamura
50%
(
22 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
95%
(
21 of
22)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Aryan Shah
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
55%
(
40 of
73)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
58% (312/227)
Win/Loss
60% (150/100)
56% (697/548)
Sets Win/Loss
59% (330/230)
52% (6134/5588)
Games Win/Loss
54% (2833/2414)
59% (122/84)
Hard Win/Loss
60% (138/91)
66% (146/74)
Clay Win/Loss
50% (6/6)
46% (33/38)
Indoor Hard W/L
67% (6/3)
26% (11/31)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.28
Aces Per Game
0.14
1632
Aces Total
357
0.21
Double Faults Per Game
0.1
1200
Total Double Faults
254
1:37:32
Average Match Time
1:7:49
465.48
Average Opponent Rank
449.99
58% (20493/35365)
1st Serve %
66% (7586/11504)
68% (13977/20493)
1st Serve Win %
66% (4983/7586)
51% (7613/14872)
2nd Serve Win %
50% (1950/3918)
44% (1645/3711)
Break Points Won % (Total)
45% (571/1267)
41% (14573/35545)
Return Points Win %
42% (4950/11845)
23% (5/17)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
33% (1/2)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
27% (4/11)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
48% (121/129)
Challenger W/L
45% (18/22)
73% (181/68)
Futures W/L
63% (132/78)
59% (305/521)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
60% (149/248)
25% (3/12)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
51% (84/164)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
52% (28/54)
56% (88/158)
Deciding Set Win %
50% (30/60)
86% (312/267)
1st Set Won, Won Match
91% (150/136)
14% (312/44)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
9% (150/14)
19% (227/44)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
14% (100/14)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
