search

Javier Barranco Cosano vs Cem Ilkel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cosano vs Ilkel analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Javier Barranco Cosano vs Cem Ilkel Important H2H Prediction Stats:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cosano has won 53.14% of points on his second serve, while Ilkel has won 47.71%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cosano, in recent form, has won 55.22% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ilkel has won 53.24%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.75% and 25.19% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Cosano has saved 61.13% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ilkel has saved 56.07% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Cosano has won 65.67% of matches played (W/L 44/ 23), with Ilkel winning 40% (W/L 20/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Cosano has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 287/ 170), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 6/ 8). Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 253/ 160), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9).
  • Player level: In the last year, Cosano has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.41% of matches (W/L 22/ 17), where as Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 37.84% of matches (W/L 14/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Cosano winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Cosano winning 3 and Ilkel winning 2. The last match between Cosano and Ilkel was at the Antalya 3 Challenger, 01-12-2021, Second, Clay with Javier Barranco Cosano getting the victory .
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:47:16.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Cosano and Ilkel have played a deciding set 1 times, with Cosano winning 0 times and Ilkel 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Cosano winning 1, and Ilkel 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cosano has played against opponents with an average rank of 309.49 while Ilkel has played against players with an average rank of 270.56.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cosano has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ilkel has won 55% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Cosano has converted 46.32% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ilkel has converted 42.15% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
bet365

Head-to-head: Cosano 1 - 1 Ilkel

Javier Barranco Cosano

15

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

15

Minor

300

Rank

247

High

25

Age

L

Plays

1

Total

1

0

Hard

0

1

Clay

0

0

Indoor

1

0

Grass

0

390

Rank

144

High

28

Age

R

Plays

Cem Ilkel

5

Total

0

Mast

1

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

4

Minor

1

Total

1

0

Hard

0

1

Clay

0

0

Indoor

1

0

Grass

0

W W W W W W L W L L

Form

L W W L L W W W L L

62% (319-198)

Career Total W/L

57% (399-307)

72% (13-5)

YTD W/L

47% (7-8)

$32,000

Career Prize Money

$225,530

1

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

Cosano VS Ilkel H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats Javier Barranco Cosano Cem Ilkel
All H2H Matches 1 1
Sets Won 3 2
Games Won 26 25
Aces (Total) 15 15
DFs (Total) 9 6
Avg Match Time 1:47:16 1:47:16
1st Serve % 61% (105/173) 63% (97/154)
1st Serve Win% 66% (69/105) 66% (64/97)
2nd Serve Win% 59% (40/68) 58% (33/57)
BPs Won% (Total) 33% (4/12) 36% (5/14)
Return Points W% 37% (57/154) 37% (64/173)
Best of 3 Sets W% 50% (1/2) 50% (1/2)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
Deciding Set Win% 0% (0/1) 100% (1/1)
1st set W, W 50% (2/1) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 50% (2/1) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 0% (0/0) 50% (2/1)

Cosano VS Ilkel H2h Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
7-6(3) 6-3
cross
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Cem Ilkel
61% ( 44 of 72)
1st Serve %
66% ( 45 of 68)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
61% ( 27 of 44)
1st Serve Won
56% ( 25 of 45)
68% ( 19 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
52% ( 12 of 23)
50% ( 3 of 6)
Break Points Won
20% ( 2 of 10)
36% ( 26 of 72)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 31 of 68)
77
Total Points Won
63
3-6 6-2 7-5
cross
Cem Ilkel
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
60% ( 52 of 86)
1st Serve %
60% ( 61 of 101)
15
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
8
75% ( 39 of 52)
1st Serve Won
69% ( 42 of 61)
62% ( 21 of 34)
2nd Serve Won
53% ( 21 of 40)
75% ( 3 of 4)
Break Points Won
17% ( 1 of 6)
30% ( 26 of 86)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 38 of 101)
98
Total Points Won
89

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Javier Barranco Cosano Cem Ilkel
YTD W/L 72% (13/5) 47% (7/8)
Sets Win/Loss 64% (27/15) 42% (14/19)
Games Win/Loss 58% (214/158) 46% (136/160)
Hard Win/Loss 67% (6/3) 50% (2/2)
Clay Win/Loss 88% (7/1) 0% (0/0)
Indoor Hard W/L 0% (0/1) 45% (5/6)
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces pg 0.21 0.53
Aces Total 38 76
DFs per game 0.19 0.2
DFs Total 35 29
Avg Match Time 1:40:37 1:25:17
Avg Opp Rank 331.39 194.87
1st Serve % 63% (741/1172) 58% (510/882)
1st Serve W% 64% (475/741) 71% (363/510)
2nd Serve W% 56% (242/431) 46% (170/372)
BPs Won% Total 54% (76/142) 44% (27/62)
Return Pts W% 45% (528/1168) 37% (318/859)
Slam W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Masters W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/1)
Main Tour W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 60% (6/4) 50% (7/7)
Futures W/L 88% (7/1) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 71% (12/17) 43% (6/14)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 50% (2/4) 75% (3/4)
Deciding Set W% 57% (4/7) 75% (3/4)
1st set W, W 91% (11/10) 83% (6/5)
1st set W, L 9% (11/1) 17% (6/1)
1st set L, W 29% (7/2) 22% (9/2)

Javier Barranco Cosano Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
Q1
cross
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
67% ( 45 of 67)
1st Serve %
67% ( 36 of 54)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
71% ( 32 of 45)
1st Serve Won
53% ( 19 of 36)
32% ( 7 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 8 of 18)
71% ( 5 of 7)
Break Points Won
43% ( 3 of 7)
42% ( 28 of 67)
Rtn Points Won
50% ( 27 of 54)
66
Total Points Won
55
L
6-4 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Giovanni Fonio
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
75% ( 60 of 80)
1st Serve %
63% ( 59 of 94)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
73% ( 44 of 60)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 37 of 59)
55% ( 11 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
66% ( 23 of 35)
33% ( 3 of 9)
Break Points Won
25% ( 2 of 8)
31% ( 25 of 80)
Rtn Points Won
36% ( 34 of 94)
89
Total Points Won
85
L
6-4 3-6 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Guy Den Ouden
69% ( 65 of 94)
1st Serve %
73% ( 58 of 79)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
0
71% ( 46 of 65)
1st Serve Won
59% ( 34 of 58)
38% ( 11 of 29)
2nd Serve Won
57% ( 12 of 21)
83% ( 5 of 6)
Break Points Won
36% ( 4 of 11)
39% ( 37 of 94)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 33 of 79)
90
Total Points Won
83
W
4-6 6-3 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Daniel Merida Aguilar
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
53% ( 44 of 83)
1st Serve %
56% ( 53 of 94)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
57% ( 25 of 44)
1st Serve Won
57% ( 30 of 53)
56% ( 22 of 39)
2nd Serve Won
46% ( 19 of 41)
38% ( 5 of 13)
Break Points Won
67% ( 6 of 9)
43% ( 36 of 83)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 45 of 94)
92
Total Points Won
85
L
1-6 6-4 6-4 H2H
R2
cross
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Calin Manda
59% ( 27 of 46)
1st Serve %
75% ( 39 of 52)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
74% ( 20 of 27)
1st Serve Won
51% ( 20 of 39)
68% ( 13 of 19)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 5 of 13)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
28% ( 13 of 46)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 27 of 52)
60
Total Points Won
38
W
6-4 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Stefan Popovic
63% ( 59 of 94)
1st Serve %
81% ( 55 of 68)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
61% ( 36 of 59)
1st Serve Won
51% ( 28 of 55)
54% ( 19 of 35)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 5 of 13)
64% ( 7 of 11)
Break Points Won
50% ( 5 of 10)
41% ( 39 of 94)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 35 of 68)
90
Total Points Won
72
W
6-2 4-6 6-3 H2H
F
cross
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Bautista Vilicich
65% ( 28 of 43)
1st Serve %
60% ( 26 of 43)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
79% ( 22 of 28)
1st Serve Won
42% ( 11 of 26)
67% ( 10 of 15)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 7 of 17)
100% ( 5 of 5)
Break Points Won
67% ( 2 of 3)
26% ( 11 of 43)
Rtn Points Won
58% ( 25 of 43)
57
Total Points Won
29
W
6-2 6-3 H2H
SF
cross
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Daniel Merida Aguilar
58% ( 36 of 62)
1st Serve %
59% ( 47 of 80)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
69% ( 25 of 36)
1st Serve Won
68% ( 32 of 47)
69% ( 18 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 14 of 33)
36% ( 4 of 11)
Break Points Won
50% ( 2 of 4)
31% ( 19 of 62)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 34 of 80)
77
Total Points Won
65
W
2-6 6-1 6-3 H2H
QF
cross
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Jorge Martinez Martinez
76% ( 39 of 51)
1st Serve %
53% ( 38 of 72)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
64% ( 25 of 39)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 24 of 38)
67% ( 8 of 12)
2nd Serve Won
26% ( 9 of 34)
56% ( 5 of 9)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
35% ( 18 of 51)
Rtn Points Won
54% ( 39 of 72)
72
Total Points Won
51
W
6-1 6-4 H2H
R2
cross
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Razvan Baiant
48% ( 24 of 50)
1st Serve %
79% ( 48 of 61)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
58% ( 14 of 24)
1st Serve Won
44% ( 21 of 48)
65% ( 17 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
54% ( 7 of 13)
75% ( 6 of 8)
Break Points Won
33% ( 2 of 6)
38% ( 19 of 50)
Rtn Points Won
54% ( 33 of 61)
64
Total Points Won
47
W
6-2 6-2 H2H

Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
R1
cross
Michael Agwi
Player
Cem Ilkel
64% ( 28 of 44)
1st Serve %
48% ( 19 of 40)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75% ( 21 of 28)
1st Serve Won
47% ( 9 of 19)
63% ( 10 of 16)
2nd Serve Won
33% ( 7 of 21)
71% ( 5 of 7)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
30% ( 13 of 44)
Rtn Points Won
60% ( 24 of 40)
55
Total Points Won
29
L
6-0 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Otto Virtanen
Player
Cem Ilkel
62% ( 21 of 34)
1st Serve %
60% ( 28 of 47)
11
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
100% ( 21 of 21)
1st Serve Won
54% ( 15 of 28)
38% ( 5 of 13)
2nd Serve Won
21% ( 4 of 19)
60% ( 6 of 10)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
24% ( 8 of 34)
Rtn Points Won
60% ( 28 of 47)
54
Total Points Won
27
L
6-2 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Cem Ilkel
Player
Johan Nikles
51% ( 25 of 49)
1st Serve %
54% ( 30 of 56)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
68% ( 17 of 25)
1st Serve Won
53% ( 16 of 30)
54% ( 13 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
23% ( 6 of 26)
46% ( 6 of 13)
Break Points Won
50% ( 2 of 4)
39% ( 19 of 49)
Rtn Points Won
61% ( 34 of 56)
64
Total Points Won
41
W
6-0 6-3 H2H
QF
cross
Cem Ilkel
Player
Illya Marchenko
61% ( 46 of 76)
1st Serve %
59% ( 53 of 90)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76% ( 35 of 46)
1st Serve Won
74% ( 39 of 53)
60% ( 18 of 30)
2nd Serve Won
46% ( 17 of 37)
33% ( 1 of 3)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
30% ( 23 of 76)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 34 of 90)
87
Total Points Won
79
W
7-6(6) 7-6(2) H2H
Q1
cross
Cem Ilkel
Player
Kyle Edmund
55% ( 56 of 102)
1st Serve %
55% ( 54 of 98)
12
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
80% ( 45 of 56)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 38 of 54)
41% ( 19 of 46)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 21 of 44)
43% ( 3 of 7)
Break Points Won
25% ( 3 of 12)
37% ( 38 of 102)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 39 of 98)
103
Total Points Won
97
W
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 H2H
Q1
cross
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Cem Ilkel
71% ( 40 of 56)
1st Serve %
59% ( 42 of 71)
13
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
88% ( 35 of 40)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 28 of 42)
50% ( 8 of 16)
2nd Serve Won
55% ( 16 of 29)
33% ( 2 of 6)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
23% ( 13 of 56)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 27 of 71)
70
Total Points Won
57
L
6-4 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Gastao Elias
Player
Cem Ilkel
60% ( 62 of 103)
1st Serve %
60% ( 52 of 87)
6
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
66% ( 41 of 62)
1st Serve Won
73% ( 38 of 52)
49% ( 20 of 41)
2nd Serve Won
37% ( 13 of 35)
45% ( 5 of 11)
Break Points Won
57% ( 4 of 7)
41% ( 42 of 103)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 36 of 87)
97
Total Points Won
93
L
3-6 6-1 7-6(6) H2H
QF
cross
Cem Ilkel
Player
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
71% ( 15 of 21)
1st Serve %
60% ( 12 of 20)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
80% ( 12 of 15)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 7 of 12)
67% ( 4 of 6)
2nd Serve Won
25% ( 2 of 8)
100% ( 2 of 2)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
24% ( 5 of 21)
Rtn Points Won
55% ( 11 of 20)
27
Total Points Won
14
W
6-1 ret. H2H
Q1
cross
Cem Ilkel
Player
Vladyslav Orlov
62% ( 42 of 68)
1st Serve %
50% ( 32 of 64)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
76% ( 32 of 42)
1st Serve Won
75% ( 24 of 32)
54% ( 14 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 14 of 32)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
29% ( 2 of 7)
32% ( 22 of 68)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 26 of 64)
72
Total Points Won
60
W
2-6 6-1 6-2 H2H
Rubber 1
L
6-3 6-2 H2H

Cosano Vs Ilkel Prediction H2H Images To Share

Potential H2H Matches This Week For Javier Barranco Cosano

Murcia Challenger

Canas vs Cosano H2H Prediction , could play in The Quarterfinals

Blanchet vs Cosano H2H Prediction , could play in The Quarterfinals

Basilashvili vs Cosano H2H Prediction , could play in The Quarterfinals

Jong vs Cosano H2H Prediction , could play in The Quarterfinals

Cosano vs Pellegrino H2H Prediction , could play in The Second round

Cosano vs Aguilar H2H Prediction , could play in The Second round

Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions